• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Conditional Election

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
WD,

Here through the prophet EZK. god gives some additional commentary on how israel could be viewed before and after God chose them as nation...Let me know if this is helpful, i think it is self explanatory....if you walk through it!!!

Ezekiel 16

King James Version (KJV)

16 Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 Son of man, cause Jerusalem to know her abominations,

3 And say, Thus saith the Lord God unto Jerusalem; Thy birth and thy nativity is of the land of Canaan; thy father was an Amorite, and thy mother an Hittite.

4 And as for thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water to supple thee; thou wast not salted at all, nor swaddled at all.

5 None eye pitied thee, to do any of these unto thee, to have compassion upon thee; but thou wast cast out in the open field, to the lothing of thy person, in the day that thou wast born.


6 And when I passed by thee, and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live.

7 I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.

8 Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.

9 Then washed I thee with water; yea, I throughly washed away thy blood from thee, and I anointed thee with oil.

10 I clothed thee also with broidered work, and shod thee with badgers' skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk.

11 I decked thee also with ornaments, and I put bracelets upon thy hands, and a chain on thy neck.

12 And I put a jewel on thy forehead, and earrings in thine ears, and a beautiful crown upon thine head.

13 Thus wast thou decked with gold and silver; and thy raiment was of fine linen, and silk, and broidered work; thou didst eat fine flour, and honey, and oil: and thou wast exceeding beautiful, and thou didst prosper into a kingdom.

14 And thy renown went forth among the heathen for thy beauty: for it was perfect through my comeliness, which I had put upon thee, saith the Lord God.

15 But thou didst trust in thine own beauty, and playedst the harlot because of thy renown, and pouredst out thy fornications on every one that passed by; his it was.

16 And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so.

17 Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them,
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The context of wd's 'proof text' is to believers, or, even in a tighter context, the 'elect' (which is by the way synonymous terminology) and this is to whom the passage is written.

It has absolutely nothing to do with conditions of salvation, nor does it support 'conditional' election. Funny how anti-cals believe in and use the doctrine of election when it's 'conditional', isn't it? :applause:

Anyhow, to use it as such is to misuse Scripture, is not rightly handling the word of truth, and is divorcing it from its intended context. :thumbs:

- Blessings
I don't recall ever stating that text (which was not my "proof text") was in regards to salvation. Now would be the time to use your new term 'strawman' and for it to actually apply.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
WD. 15 times God says.[see post 21]..I did this, I did that, I covered thee, I made covenant with thee, even though they were to be pitied...It was only God setting His love on them that made them any different at all. The same is true for all chrisitans.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The only base for election is what Aaron posted.Even when God singled out Israel as a nation he basically said this:

6 For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

7 The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

8 But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt


His will expressed in the covenant of redemption ...based solely on God's loyal love...His oath... His purpose was the only reason given,
"His purpose" is not a condition? For something to be truly unconditional, purpose of any kind must be thrown out the window.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
WD. 15 times God says.[see post 21]..I did this, I did that, I covered thee, I made covenant with thee, even though they were to be pitied...It was only God setting His love on them that made them any different at all. The same is true for all chrisitans.

I dont deny any of that, but the Bible is clear God requires faith, regardless of debated origin, for salvation.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"His purpose" is not a condition? For something to be truly unconditional, purpose of any kind must be thrown out the window.

WD,

If God's purpose which he purposes among the 3 persons of the Godhead can be described as based on a condition or not...frankly i do not know.I mean as in Isa 55..his thoughts and ways are far beyond me ....not even on my radar screen, apart from what is revealed.
That being said...there is no condition in man that draws or repels His choice.
I believe the scripture teaches that God having viewed all mankind as fallen and condemned, In Mercy purposed to save a multitude in the lamb slain.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I dont deny any of that, but the Bible is clear God requires faith, regardless of debated origin, for salvation.

I agreed with what you posted earlier ,but i have to go back to work now...I will attempt to weigh in on that post later..it will take more time...

Ezk 16 is such a very powerful image of How God saves his people...I think that is why it is shocking that some would turn from Him as they did,showing themselves to be outside of the true Israel.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
The context of 1 Peter 5:5 is referencing the saved, not the lost.

You should have known this by now.

The attempt to use it to prove the error of 'unconditional election' is to misuse it and is not rightly handling the Word of truth.

- Blessings
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The context of 1 Peter 5:5 is referencing the saved, not the lost.

You should have known this by now.

The attempt to use it to prove the error of 'unconditional election' is to misuse it and is not rightly handling the Word of truth.

- Blessings
You are not getting it. First, it wasn't my "proof text". I was expanding on what another poster wrote in regards to the comment God never choose based on condition. Second, I know the context of that passage and it neither intended to supports nor deny conditional election, although considering we are saved by grace, would support the former.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
John 15:16 You did not choose me, but I chose you :type:

That too...

(btw, the anti-Cals will rush in and say 'That was for the disciples!!!' -- blah blah blah! Salvation has ALWAYS been by His choice AND unconditional, and this is yet another example of this.)

And we see that anti-cals misuse Scripture to 'prove' unconditional election, specifically in the recent misusage of 1 Peter 5:5. More of the same: not rightly handling the Word of truth.

The passage is no proof text for unconditional election. It is written to the elect in its context.

Some should have known this by now.

- Blessings
 
Last edited by a moderator:

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
That too...

(btw, the anti-Cals will rush in and say 'That was for the disciples!!!' -- blah blah blah! Salvation has ALWAYS been by His choice AND unconditional, and this is yet another example of this.)

And we see that anti-cals misuse Scripture to 'prove' unconditional election, specifically in the recent misusage of 1 Peter 5:5. More of the same: not rightly handling the Word of truth.

The passage is no proof text for unconditional election. It is written to the elect in its context.

Some should have known this by now.

- Blessings
Nobody used 1 Peter out of context, that was your strawman, remember? At any rate its quite comical to see with the above context, we can just dismiss the context ("blah, blah, blah"). Thats being consistent.
 

Jedi Knight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Isaiah 1:9 If the LORD of Heaven's Armies had not spared a few of us, we would have been wiped out like Sodom, destroyed like Gomorrah.:type:
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
God chose Jacob and rejected Esau because Esau willingly gave away his birthright to be the primary heir of their father. Furthermore, God chose Jacob after he wrestled with the angel of the LORD. It wasn't just a random lottery pick.

Hi Aaron, Calvinism cannot be defended rationally. Here you claim that God does not make conditional choices. God opposes the proud and gives grace to the humble reflects conditional choices. So strike on, the argument is unbiblical.

God tells us He made the choice so the older would serve the younger, so the very passage you cite demonstrates the opposite. Strike two.

Does God only make conditional choices, or choices based on fulfilling His purpose and plan, whether conditional or unconditional? He makes choices based on fulfilling His purpose and plan. Calvinists like to put God in a box, saying He is only able to do as Calvinism declares. Strike three, Calvinism is outta here.

And here we go again. For the noncalvinist, God elects qualities, and those who possess those qualities are elect. Despite the clear, concise and straightforward Scripture to the contrary, they insist that Jacob was loved because he was lovely, and Esau was hated because of something he did.

For the Calvinist, and according to the Scriptures, God elects people, and while Jacob and Esau were equal, and before either had done any good or evil, God chose Jacob and rejected Esau.

The condition? His will.

God's will is never good enough for the noncalvinist.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
I don't recall ever stating that text (which was not my "proof text") was in regards to salvation. Now would be the time to use your new term 'strawman' and for it to actually apply.

I am so glad to see the concept of "strawman" applied correctly. :)
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
The OP was setting the grounds for conditional election to be true. Even that passage you provided shows there is a condition, but the condition did not include Jacob or Esau doing good or bad. Its a huge leap to conclude from that election is unconditional.
From which correspondence school are you learning rhetorical arts?

Stick with the accepted definition of the term. Conditional Election describes the belief God elects people on the basis of His foreknowledge of their righteous faith.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
From which correspondence school are you learning rhetorical arts?

Stick with the accepted definition of the term. Conditional Election describes the belief God elects people on the basis of His foreknowledge of their righteous faith.
I learn from the best...you.

Or better yet, lets stick with the true meaning of unconditional which excludes even God's purposes. May as well scratch his will while you are at it and correctly defined as a condition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Or better yet, lets stick with the true meaning of unconditional which excludes even God's purposes.
No it doesn't. Unconditional election means there is no onus on the one elected.

You need to ask for a refund of your $29.95.
 

DrJamesAch

New Member
Ach;

"
Romans 11:6 does not contrast....faith/works....but rather grace works.

It contrasts works and shows that work is nothing other than work. Grace is grace, faith is faith, and work is work.

And as stated before, if faith is taken to be a work, then the Calvinistic interpretation of Eph 2:8 would read "By grace are ye saved through faith/works". Although that is an explicit contradiction in the text since the next verse says "not of works", if Calvinism is consistent in its usage of their interpretation of faith, that's exactly the implications this verse would have.
 
Top