But you missed the point, MB.
NON Calvinists teach Adam was a living soul, who upon death passed into some place God prepared.
NON Calvinists teach that the fall of man corrupted Adam and thereby ALL because ALL have sinned.
NON Calvinists teach that without the direct work of the Holy Spirit no man can be saved.
NON Calvinists teach that humankind is incapable, have no innate ability, and are brought by God's choice to salvation. Such do construct an unbiblical prevenient / preceding grace that lifts one into a neutral position that allows that person to accept or reject salvation. But that grace is not automatic, and will for each individual have a final call made where God's prevenient / preceding grace forever withdraws from that person.
NON Calvinists also teach (at least Baptist ones do) the preservation / perseverance of the saints, referred to "once saved always saved."
NON Calvinists teach both predestination and election - they merely adjust the timing.
So, for you to state, I deny most all of Calvinism is also to deny what Non-Calvinists teach.
All Biblical teaching has some Calvinistic elements, but either timing is adjusted, conditions are adjusted, or one proposes some freedom of will, or innate ability into the mix.
But ultimately, the thinking in the most conservative presentation resolves to a basic calvinistic approach.
Name a group (other than RCC), be it Methodist, Baptist, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Church of God,... in which the Bible is taught as the basis of all faith and practice, and their views boiled to the basic level resolve to that which is calvinistic.
Now you may push back against such a statement, but it is none the less true.
