Alan Gross
Well-Known Member
#4 says you have six crutches for why you reject the Supremacy of God?
1 made into 6.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
#4 says you have six crutches for why you reject the Supremacy of God?
When have we said otherwise?
Oh I am perfectly aware they are rewriting Scripture. That's the only way you can deny the doctrines of grace is to either rewrite parts of Scripture or ignore parts of Scripture.You're reading The Bible, but there has been a twisting of the passage there, into a Wicker Chair.
It adds 'unbelief' to God's Revelation of Predestination and then misinterpreted inferences are sandwiched over 'law' and 'attained' to pervert them.
It's a pure rewriting.
Oh I am perfectly aware they are rewriting Scripture. That's the only way you can deny the doctrines of grace is to either rewrite parts of Scripture or ignore parts of Scripture.
Are you in agreement with Ruckman that the devil and Eve procreated Cain?
No. I'm saying the first recorded birth was a child of the devil.
You claim the "doctrines of grace" like your flawed systematic theology has a monopoly on the phrase, yet my non-predeterministic doctrines of grace are more inclusive than yours and uses scripture to relay the truth of the Good News of a genuine offer of salvation for whosoever will believe, rather than leaving out the Bad News that only a lucky special few have been pre-selected to have the ability to respond to the light.Oh I am perfectly aware they are rewriting Scripture. That's the only way you can deny the doctrines of grace is to either rewrite parts of Scripture or ignore parts of Scripture.
More inclusive? What in the world does inclusiveness have anything to do with anything?You claim the "doctrines of grace" like your flawed systematic theology has a monopoly on the phrase, yet my non-predeterministic doctrines of grace are more inclusive than yours and uses scripture to relay the truth of the Good News of a genuine offer of salvation for whosoever will believe, rather than leaving out the Bad News that only a lucky special few have been pre-selected to have the ability to respond to the light.
You start with a premise that humans will seek God, apart from God calling them out.You claim the "doctrines of grace" like your flawed systematic theology has a monopoly on the phrase, yet my non-predeterministic doctrines of grace are more inclusive than yours and uses scripture to relay the truth of the Good News of a genuine offer of salvation for whosoever will believe, rather than leaving out the Bad News that only a lucky special few have been pre-selected to have the ability to respond to the light.
You claim the "doctrines of grace" like your flawed systematic theology has a monopoly on the phrase, yet my non-predeterministic doctrines of grace are more inclusive than yours and uses scripture to relay the truth of the Good News of a genuine offer of salvation for whosoever will believe, rather than leaving out the Bad News that only a lucky special few have been pre-selected to have the ability to respond to the light.
You start with a premise that humans will seek God, apart from God calling them out.
It is a false premise. We see the first two sinners hiding from God, not seeking Him. God calls them. God graciously covers their nakedness (their guilt). God shows mercy toward them and gives them a promise of redemption and reconciliation through a promised one.
Your theology of grace is not more inclusive. In fact, it's not grace. It's human merit moving God to act. We call that works salvation. You just declare that all humanity can work their way to God by seeking and choosing. It's all inclusive works salvation. Grace. Grace is only God responding to your good works as you demand he respond. That's not even grace, even though you imagine it so.
Preaching the Gospel while not being transparent that one believes most people do not have the ability to respond to it is just pretending...They just pretend.
To try to put darkness into the light of the Gospel is heretical.It's play 'church' that has very little use or love for God's Word and is heretical.
Not being transparent? What is not transparent? That makes no sense.Preaching the Gospel while not being transparent that one believes most people do not have the ability to respond to it is just pretending...
What darkness is being put in? Now you are just making stuff up.To try to put darkness into the light of the Gospel is heretical.
Preaching the Gospel while not being transparent that one believes most people do not have the ability to respond to it is just pretending...
To try to put darkness into the light of the Gospel is heretical.
That's what I'm reading.So, "the preaching of the Gospel is foolishness", to you.
I'm sorry, are there people here who are shocked by that?THERE'S THE WORD!!
THERE'S THE WORD!!
PARTICULAR SAID,
"THE FIRST TWO SINNERS..."
Wow!!
I lived to see it, tonight!!!!
YAHOOOO!!!
Telling a child, believe and you will be saved, but leaving out the part of your doctrinal teachings that most don't have such an ability is not being transparent. - and that's a nice way to put it.Not being transparent? What is not transparent? That makes no sense.
Why do I have to put that in there. Preach to all as if they are elect because we do not know who is or is not. Your thoughts on this are just plain stupid. And that's a nice way to put it.Telling a child, believe and you will be saved, but leaving out the part of your doctrinal teachings that most don't have such an ability is not being transparent. - and that's a nice way to put it.
You might want to read that again rather than childishly try to put accusing words into my mouth to form your argument.So, "the preaching of the Gospel is foolishness", to you.
No, he had it right.You might want to read that again rather than childishly try to put accusing words into my mouth to form your argument.