Another problem found with John 6 issue of the 'Father drawing' is this is specific to Israel here.
Why? Becuase Israel (The Fathers Wife and chosen People unto Himself) was under a curse for disobedience and rebellion therefore not all of Israel (in the National sense) was 'permitted' to come to Christ. This is why the term 'draw' is in the subjunctive mood and is why God was not 'drawing' them all.
So you can't apply this drawing of the Father beyond it's context. We might see principle but we should not found primary doctrines upon secondary principles.
In fact we see Jesus declares it is no longer the Father who will be drawing peole anymore but Himself when He declared "and I, if I be lifted up I will draw all [men] unto myself."
Why? Because the promise exended beyond the Jewish Nation (Gods people and wife, whom God set aside for time that Christ might make for Himself a Bride) to those outside its ethnic and religous boundries (Gentile followers of Jewish beliefs). Christ's Bride made up of the multitude of mankind. Granted it was founded and established by Jewish people whom God gave His son but they are not the whole of those whom Christ has drawn to Himself.
How will Christ draw all men unto unto Himself? First is by the same turths God gave from the beginning Romans 1 and 2 - Nature and the Conscience. And if a person will believe the natural things which God reveals to them by the Holy Spirit. Then by that same Spirit God will reveal more through His Spirit who is in the world and who's ministry it is(or part of His ministry) to convict the WORLD of Sin, His Righteousness, and Judgment to Come. The Trinity working is unison and in accordance to God predetermined plan.
However, I will make this proclaimation about 'irresistable' that it isn't what is implied in the texts regarding Gods (whether the Father or Christ/Holy Spirit).
And it is found in 2 Thes.
First - If salvation was purchased for a 'limited' number only then no man who was not regarded as one of that number can be said to be even 'potentially' saved. The Gospel call is not regard as anything before God for that individual regarding salvation for them.
Second - If God compels or irresistably draws men then no man can reject the truth God reveals. If a person knows saving truth it is only because God has revealed it since the natural man can not know spiritual things.
Third - If God chose some (the Redeemed) NOT by any foreknowledge of choice then all men whom Christ will not die for are already condemned regardless of unbelief and that belief or unbelief has no significance with regard to Gods choosing.
Now in verse 10 we find some interesting things.
1. - The scrpture states the anti-christ will use all types of deception on those who [are] perishing or [will] perish. NEXT the scripture says WHY they are destined to perish. Does it stat they perish because God did not chose them regardless of belief? No, but here is what it begins with - BECAUSE or DUE TO THIS - here is the reason they will perish, be damned, or condemned to God's Judgment - wrath and Hell.
THEY RECEIVED NOT THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH...
The term 'received' is not in the Passive voice (meaning God does this to or in them) but is in the Middle Deponent which is almost always used in the Active voice (meaning the subject such as 'they' is the doer). It was 'THEIR' choice NOT to receive. You might ask me where I saw a choice. First in the fact 'they' did not 'receive' or (take to themselves - to learn, like John 6:45). and Second is found in #2.
2. ...THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED. Now here is a very strange thing to say if Christ did not die for them. If God did not choose them they CAN NOT even be considered 'potentially' or remotely 'hypothetically' saved. And yet the text reads
"in them that perish BECAUSE they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved". Apparently receiving truth is connected to salvation. Many Calvinists would agree as do I. But were we differ is in the FACT scripture states THEY PERISH BECAUSE...They did not receive the love of the Truth...that could save them.
3. If Christ did not die for them then this verse is a farce, and a false declaration by God Himself. He does not state they perish because they were not chosen regardless of belief or that their damnation has nothing to do with their choice, but that they perish becuase they WOULD NOT not COULD NOT beleive the truth and that THEY (who to some were pre-ordained to perish and have no hope of salvation) might BE SAVED. and if that isn't enough God goes after this truth again in the next verse
Now listen to how God closes this:
NOW, we see something interesting regarding their condemnation or damnation. For God states He sent that delusion (blindness) after their rejection of the Truth that they might be saved, SO THEY MIGHT ALL BE DAMNED... Notice please their damnation was not sealed until they rejected the truth that COULD HAVE SAVED THEM. If you don't believe me just read the rest of the sentence. God DAMNS (condemns to judgment) those who rejected and did not believe the Truth (Jesus), but had pleasure in their unrighteousness. Notice they are condemned by their choice.
They were not hated and condemned by God who passed over them and did not provide a means of salvation for them like some declare. According to these passages of scripture it was their choice that determined in the eyes of God their relationship with Him - whether in unity and Love or seperated and under condemnation. Thus Gods chosing us unto Himself IS or does have some basis in us believing His Truth.
And for those who might still try to state, the reason they did not beleive is because they were not 'irresistably draw'. Then I ask you:
If a person has the potential of being saved must they not be draw by God?
And if God draws them how can they harden their hearts, or reject His truth THAT COULD SAVE THEM since salvation is only possible for limited?
And lastly how can the scriptures declare of the followers of the anti-christ, "that they might be saved"?
Ok, now you can tear it to peices :thumbs: :laugh:
Why? Becuase Israel (The Fathers Wife and chosen People unto Himself) was under a curse for disobedience and rebellion therefore not all of Israel (in the National sense) was 'permitted' to come to Christ. This is why the term 'draw' is in the subjunctive mood and is why God was not 'drawing' them all.
So you can't apply this drawing of the Father beyond it's context. We might see principle but we should not found primary doctrines upon secondary principles.
In fact we see Jesus declares it is no longer the Father who will be drawing peole anymore but Himself when He declared "and I, if I be lifted up I will draw all [men] unto myself."
Why? Because the promise exended beyond the Jewish Nation (Gods people and wife, whom God set aside for time that Christ might make for Himself a Bride) to those outside its ethnic and religous boundries (Gentile followers of Jewish beliefs). Christ's Bride made up of the multitude of mankind. Granted it was founded and established by Jewish people whom God gave His son but they are not the whole of those whom Christ has drawn to Himself.
How will Christ draw all men unto unto Himself? First is by the same turths God gave from the beginning Romans 1 and 2 - Nature and the Conscience. And if a person will believe the natural things which God reveals to them by the Holy Spirit. Then by that same Spirit God will reveal more through His Spirit who is in the world and who's ministry it is(or part of His ministry) to convict the WORLD of Sin, His Righteousness, and Judgment to Come. The Trinity working is unison and in accordance to God predetermined plan.
However, I will make this proclaimation about 'irresistable' that it isn't what is implied in the texts regarding Gods (whether the Father or Christ/Holy Spirit).
And it is found in 2 Thes.
Now granted this is about those who will follow the Anti-Christ but there is no better text in scripture to establish my point. I mean these followers of his are already known to be destined for an eternal hell.2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
First - If salvation was purchased for a 'limited' number only then no man who was not regarded as one of that number can be said to be even 'potentially' saved. The Gospel call is not regard as anything before God for that individual regarding salvation for them.
Second - If God compels or irresistably draws men then no man can reject the truth God reveals. If a person knows saving truth it is only because God has revealed it since the natural man can not know spiritual things.
Third - If God chose some (the Redeemed) NOT by any foreknowledge of choice then all men whom Christ will not die for are already condemned regardless of unbelief and that belief or unbelief has no significance with regard to Gods choosing.
Now in verse 10 we find some interesting things.
1. - The scrpture states the anti-christ will use all types of deception on those who [are] perishing or [will] perish. NEXT the scripture says WHY they are destined to perish. Does it stat they perish because God did not chose them regardless of belief? No, but here is what it begins with - BECAUSE or DUE TO THIS - here is the reason they will perish, be damned, or condemned to God's Judgment - wrath and Hell.
THEY RECEIVED NOT THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH...
The term 'received' is not in the Passive voice (meaning God does this to or in them) but is in the Middle Deponent which is almost always used in the Active voice (meaning the subject such as 'they' is the doer). It was 'THEIR' choice NOT to receive. You might ask me where I saw a choice. First in the fact 'they' did not 'receive' or (take to themselves - to learn, like John 6:45). and Second is found in #2.
2. ...THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED. Now here is a very strange thing to say if Christ did not die for them. If God did not choose them they CAN NOT even be considered 'potentially' or remotely 'hypothetically' saved. And yet the text reads
"in them that perish BECAUSE they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved". Apparently receiving truth is connected to salvation. Many Calvinists would agree as do I. But were we differ is in the FACT scripture states THEY PERISH BECAUSE...They did not receive the love of the Truth...that could save them.
3. If Christ did not die for them then this verse is a farce, and a false declaration by God Himself. He does not state they perish because they were not chosen regardless of belief or that their damnation has nothing to do with their choice, but that they perish becuase they WOULD NOT not COULD NOT beleive the truth and that THEY (who to some were pre-ordained to perish and have no hope of salvation) might BE SAVED. and if that isn't enough God goes after this truth again in the next verse
'For this cause' - what cause or for what reason (not believing the truth that could save them) ... God shall send them a strong delusion that they will believe a lie. They chose the Lie over the Truth and for THEIR CHOOSING God sends forth His Judgment against them for their rejection of truth or The Truth (Jesus).2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
Now listen to how God closes this:
So far we have these people rejecting the truth (Christ Jesus) that could save them. Then God sends forth a Judgment of delusion (blindness) AFTER rejecting the truth that they will continue believing the lie. BUT NOW...2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness
NOW, we see something interesting regarding their condemnation or damnation. For God states He sent that delusion (blindness) after their rejection of the Truth that they might be saved, SO THEY MIGHT ALL BE DAMNED... Notice please their damnation was not sealed until they rejected the truth that COULD HAVE SAVED THEM. If you don't believe me just read the rest of the sentence. God DAMNS (condemns to judgment) those who rejected and did not believe the Truth (Jesus), but had pleasure in their unrighteousness. Notice they are condemned by their choice.
They were not hated and condemned by God who passed over them and did not provide a means of salvation for them like some declare. According to these passages of scripture it was their choice that determined in the eyes of God their relationship with Him - whether in unity and Love or seperated and under condemnation. Thus Gods chosing us unto Himself IS or does have some basis in us believing His Truth.
And for those who might still try to state, the reason they did not beleive is because they were not 'irresistably draw'. Then I ask you:
If a person has the potential of being saved must they not be draw by God?
And if God draws them how can they harden their hearts, or reject His truth THAT COULD SAVE THEM since salvation is only possible for limited?
And lastly how can the scriptures declare of the followers of the anti-christ, "that they might be saved"?
Ok, now you can tear it to peices :thumbs: :laugh: