I live in the Dakota's (Sioux Nation) and did live in Florida (Seminoles).reformedbeliever said:Allan, you need to come out and minister the Gospel to the Indians a while! :godisgood:
So I am and did minister to the Indians as God allows.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I live in the Dakota's (Sioux Nation) and did live in Florida (Seminoles).reformedbeliever said:Allan, you need to come out and minister the Gospel to the Indians a while! :godisgood:
reformedbeliever said:Have you read this thread?
You know I believe in the Responsiblity of Will.reformedbeliever said:An act of the will.
Allan said:I live in the Dakota's (Sioux Nation) and did live in Florida (Seminoles).
So I am and did minister to the Indians as God allows.
Triple post!Allan said:I live in the Dakota's (Sioux Nation) and did live in Florida (Seminoles).
So I am and did minister to the Indians as God allows.
And again. This bb is really messed up!Allan said:I live in the Dakota's (Sioux Nation) and did live in Florida (Seminoles).
So I am and did minister to the Indians as God allows.
Allan said:You know I believe in the Responsiblity of Will.
When God reveals truth we are responsible for what we do with it.
Who am I to say that God in revealing truth to against the lie we have held, does not in that moment of revealed truth enable me to respond in such a manner as to beleive or reject?
I can personally tell you of a couple of different storiesreformedbeliever said:And how many of them told you about their long dead ancestors who knew about Christ? I have had a few... one who showed me a prayer feather (golden eagle) which had three dots on it. He said it symbolized the triune God. After a little more questioning... it was obvious he didn't really understand... and that it was another god... such as mother earth et.
reformedbeliever said:Well Allan, that is what I've been trying to tell you. Being born again is being enabled to exercise our wills. Once we are born again of God, we will exercise our wills in the affirmative. All that the Father gives me...............
I don't agree because scripture tells me differently regarding what born-again means. :laugh:reformedbeliever said:Well Allan, that is what I've been trying to tell you. Being born again is being enabled to exercise our wills. Once we are born again of God, we will exercise our wills in the affirmative. All that the Father gives me...............
Yeah, I had to 'x' out three different times.reformedbeliever said:And again. This bb is really messed up!
Allan said:I don't agree because scripture tells me differently regarding what born-again means. :laugh:
As I stated, If we understand anything about God, His Glory, His power, His Godhead, His Son who can save us, and His Judgment to come - then by your definition they are born-again but many of those born-again will be in hell.
Again Rom 1 and 2 Thes 2 just for examples. They KNOW spiritual truth and in detail but reject it. They could not have known any of those things since they are spiritually discerned but they reject God, so how could they know them unless God revealed those spiritual truths to them?
All the Father gives me - regards the Jews in that setting though the same promise of a resurrection to those who beleive in Him is extended to the Gentiles, whom Christ Jesus will draw to Himself through the agency of the Holy Spirit convinicting the World of Sin, His Righteousness, and the Judgment to come.![]()
Allan said:Yeah, I had to 'x' out three different times.
BTW - about this 'pick on Allan day'? :laugh: :laugh:
Please understand, that while on here brother, I try to bring understanding regarding mans resposibility and speak often about men. I in no way speak about this in the measure I do on here. You already know the other half of the story so I don't have to debate you or convience you of that. Just so you know. This is me debating a portion of scripture NOT how or specifically what I preach.
True, they do. BUT they must FIRST reject Him. I am quite sure you have read Romans 1:18-32. But I encourage you to do it again and look at just how much they DO know and then reject. And as you are doing that and seeing them rejecting Him whom they know and His judgment to come (that is a pretty sound knowing in my opinion) also notice that scripture states after their rejection of Him, 'it is for THIS cause God gave them over' and see how many times that crops up.reformedbeliever said:I disagree. They know there is an Almighty God, but they do not know spiritually who He is. They make up gods in His place.
God and God alone be praised. In Him and for them - Amen!reformedbeliever said:I know that brother. You sharpen my iron. God has used you to give me insight into what I call contending with God for the souls of men. If God has chosen x amount of people to be saved, and all the rest will go to hell.... I'll fight Him for the rest. Thank you for that brother.
Frist let me point out that you are declaring doctrine based upon the application of allegoical interpretation. This is NEVER allowed unless other scripture LITERALLY declares the same -- and there is none.Rippon said:I know this one must have been done a time or two , but here goes again .
In John 6:44 Jesus said : No one can come to me unless the Father who sent Me draws him , and I will raise him up at the last day .
The Lord had already said in verse 37 that all that the Father gives Me will come to Me ... And verse 65 deals with the same .
Isn't verse 44 rather clear ? Draws . The Greek word is elkw . It's found in other verses such as John 18:10 : Then Simon Peter , having a sword , drew it ...
John 21:11 : Simon Peter went up and dragged up and dragged the net ...
Acts 21:30 : ... and dragged him out of the temple ...
Acts 16:19 : ... they seized Paul and silas and dragged them into the marketplace to the authorities .
James 2:6 : Don't the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts ?
Kittel's Dictionary of the New Testament defines elkw as to " draw by an irrestible force ." There is no wooing going on . I seem to remember R.C. Sproul talking about this in one of his books . In one of his classes with his mentor John Gerstner this very thing came up . God's drawing is never partial , it is complete .
"What shall WE do that WE might work the works of God?" John 6:28npetreley said:They asked what works they could do, and the answer was "The work of God is this..." In other words, there is no work we can do. It is the work of God, not the work of man. And that work (that God does) is to believe on the one He sent.
"Wooing" is NOT the issue. The connotation of "drawing" is the issue.Rippon said:No , GS . You did not answer the question . Where in the Bible is wooing mentioned with respect to the drawing of some by the Father to Jesus .
Words NEVER are defined apart from their context, belvedere.belvedere said:I made this point in a Bible study awhile back, that the word translated "draw" was the same word used for drawing the sword, drawing in the fishing net, etc. Sounds pretty "irresistable". I was told that in those verses (sword, net) that the word means "will come", but in the case of PEOPLE being drawn, it means "may come". It sounded like a very subjective explanation to me, but I know very little about Greek, so I'm certainly in no position to say for sure.
You, sir, have a perverse view of salvation. It is Calvinist "to the core" and that is why it is perverse.reformedbeliever said:So it would be an exercise of the will. We do not exercise our will until we are born again.