I'm sorry, but this is all over the place theologically. The Bible, and more specifically, the NT, is one book, and if you find repentance in two or three places, that is quite enough to establish it as a doctrine. The epistles were written to believers for crying out loud. They are instruction for those who have already repented and trusted in Christ. Why on earth would Paul or whoever tell those who have already done so to repent??
1. The book of Romans Paul wrote the believers at Rome whom he had never met. It was a treatise on soteriology. It is the most comprehensive book on the doctrine of salvation in the Bible. There is more written on salvation in that one book then in all the gospels and the book of Acts put together. Have you never heard of the "Romans Road," and why it is a popular way for believers to share the gospel to unbelievers?
2. One of the most concise descriptions of the gospel "by the which you are saved," is given in 1Cor.15:1-4. No clearer definition of the gospel is given then in those four verses right there.
3. Yes the epistles were written to believers,
as was every book of the Bible written to believers. I don't know one book of the Bible that was written to the unsaved, do you?
Hear the opening words of our Lord's ministry: "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15). Whom was He addressing? Everyone! Whoever was in earshot. What more do you need? If you won't accept our Lord's own words as doctrine.......words fail me.
The message is pre-cross. Christ hadn't died yet. Look where the gospel is defined in 1Cor.15:1-4. The gospel (good news), is that Christ died, was buried, and rose again the third day,
according to the Scriptures. That is what the gospel is. In the message you are quoting Christ had not yet atoned for our sins. It was a message for the Jews. It wasn't everyone. He was speaking to the Jews. He was offering the Kingdom, something that he would only offer to the Jews. But they rejected it, and Him.
In the epistles, the only place you are likely to find a reference to repentence is where Paul is giving a summary of his teaching. Obviously you find repentance as the very centre of Paul's preaching to both Jew and Gentile in Acts 26:20, but if you use that as a template you can also find a reasonably large hint of it in 2Cor 5 ("Be reconciled to God") and also in Col 1:28 ("Warning every man....").
The epistles teach that both Jew and Gentile are one and that there is no difference. We don't see that difference so clearly in Acts. One is reconciled to God by putting their faith in Christ.
In 1Cor 5 we have the immoral man to be cast out of the church, but in 2Cor 2:5ff,it seems clear that the man has repented and is to be restored.
Yes, the immoral man was a believer. Believers should be repenting of their sins every day to keep in fellowship with God. This has nothing to do with salvation. See 1John 1:9. This believer had a serious sin that he needed to repent of in order to be restored to the church. That didn't mean he was not saved. It has nothing to do with salvation.
In a later post, DHK writes,
God give new birth to the unregenerate, after which they repent and trust in Christ.
That is what you believe. I don't believe that, and I fail to find that in Scripture. The new birth and salvation are simultaneous.
Now; is it possible for someone to be born from above by the Spirit of Almighty God and then reject Christ? I say no (eg. 1Peter 1:3-5), and if you want to argue about Heb 6 & 10, it would be better to open another thread.
How is a person born again.
1Pet.1:23 It says specifically "being born again of the word of God."
One is born again by faith in the word of God (the message of God's Word).
I believe what the Bible says even if it goes against yours or Calvin's reasoning. God said his ways are higher than your ways. His thoughts are higher than your thoughts.