• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Five questions??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skandelon

<b>Moderator</b>
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why some are willing and others are not.

You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why God is willing to save you and not another. To tell you WHY a free moral agent makes a choice would be conceding the point up for debate. You assume a deterministic response is necessary.

Why did a chooser make a choice? He is the chooser, so HE is the reason for the choice, period. To suggest something outside the chooser determined his choice makes that thing the chooser. You turn influences and desires into things that are greater than the determining agent.

Why did God create you or me or that ant or this leaf? You can keep asking why all day long but the answer is always come back to because HE chose to, period.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why God is willing to save you and not another.

You answered this earlier. HE saved me for His Glory. Why does HE pass over some only Scripture can answer:

Romans 9:20-24
20* Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21. Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22. What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23. And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24. Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?




To tell you WHY a free moral agent makes a choice would be conceding the point up for debate. You assume a deterministic response is necessary.

Why did a chooser make a choice? He is the chooser, so HE is the reason for the choice, period. To suggest something outside the chooser determined his choice makes that thing the chooser. You turn influences and desires into things that are greater than the determining agent.

You are chasing your tail on this one Skandelon!

Why did God create you or me or that ant or this leaf?

Revelation 4:11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.


You can keep asking why all day long but the answer is always come back to because HE chose to, period.

You are correct and Romans 9:20-24 tells us why: The potter has power over the clay!.

Now I have answered yoyr questions you answer mine!

You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why some are willing and others are not.
 
That's why you'll never get it. You need things to be WAY too simple.

Your statement above is bogus- thoroughly bogus. The Bible contradicts this thoroughly. But you cling to it because it is extraordinarily simple.

Some people's Bible is not THE Bible- it is the Bumper Sticker Theology Bible.
If it is short and cute and could be placed on a car bumper- THEN BY GOLLY IT MUST BE TRUE!!

But the Word of God is far more glorious than that.



It depends on what you mean when you say "in Christ". You have repeated that phrase over and over in this debate as if it is some tremendous argument against the process of regeneration beginning before repentance- but it is meaningless unless you tell us what you mean by "in Christ". I know the phrase is in the Bible, but what do YOU mean by it? What do you interpret that phrase to mean and why do you think it has anything to do with this debate?



There are numerous passages of Scripture that speak of people who'd be better off if they had never received the knowledge of Christ: II Peter 2, Hebrews 6 and 10, etc...

Jude says of these people that they are "twice dead".

These are people who were made partakers of the Holy Ghost and who have tasted the good word of God and the power of the world to come- but the spirtual life that was planted in their hearts by the Spirit of God withered and died before it came to fruition.

Paul said that the process of salvation works like this- one plants, another waters and God gives the increase. That's an embryonic phase.

Jesus said of one man- "Thou art not FAR from the Kingdom of God" He was not completely in the world, yet he was not yet in the Kingdom. Truth and life was spawning in him.

Like Calvin, I believe there are people who receive a measure of life but come short of the new birth and eternal life. They are twice dead. Born dead and then still born in the spiritual process.

Salvation is instantaneous but there is a beautiful and complex process that brings about that instantaneous moment.

You don't have to agree with that. But what you do have to agree with if you are to be at all intellectually honest about scripture is that NO ONE seeks after God in their spiritually dead state.

**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?

Now, let us venture back to the Garden, and I will show you the prettiest picture of the Gospel you could ever think of:

Gen. 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Now, here I can see a symbol of Jesus(Tree of Life), and the Gospel(flaming sword). Now, God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden before they could get to the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever. God then placed the flaming sword betwixt them and the Tree, so the only way back to the Tree of Life would have been for them to go through the flaming sword. It's the same way today. God has His Word, which is what we must live by if we are to ever make it to heaven. For us to get to Jesus, we MUST go through the Gospel, and when we go this route, we partake of the Tree of Life(Jesus), and we will live forever.

That is why Jesus stated these known facts:

John 6:48 I am that bread of life.

49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.


53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.


Just as the Tree of Life in the Garden was Adam's and Eve's only life source, so is Jesus our only life source today. You don't have life unless you are in Jesus, and you also aren't in Jesus if you don't partake of His flesh and blood(spiritually speaking). This is my "bumpersticker theology', and if you don't like it, then that's solely your opinion, and right, to disagree, I guess.



Oh, and for proof of the flaming sword as a symbol of the Gospel:

Heb. 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.



Rev. 1:12 And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;

13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.

14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, and God sought them. Apparently you think they couldn't speak to God, converse with him or be reconciled? I guess you think the only reason they got clothes from God and had a discussion with him was because they were regenerated first?

Huh??? I'm not sure what you are talking about. They had a in-depth conversation with God in which he makes them clothes, explains to them the curses (none of which are 'total depravity' btw), and tells them they are now like God in that they know both good and evil.

Plus, that is not even an example of God's effort to make reconciliation with man as we see through the gospel.

You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them. God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them. God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.

Thanks percho for explaining that to Skandelon.:laugh: I seem to be unable to do so!!:smilewinkgrin::tongue3::BangHead:
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And yet Heb. 11 has a list of people who were willing, so what's your point? Some are willing and some aren't.

Do you believe the people in chapter 11 of Hebrews, singular or plural as in passing through the sea, did the things they did because of their faith?

OR

Do you think the people singular or plural did what they did because God called them to bring about the following concerning faith?

And before the coming of the faith, under law we were being kept, shut up to the faith about to be revealed, Gal 3:23

After all at least from Moses on those named and or alluded to were under the law shut up to the faith.

Just what faith did they die in? Their own, or faith that had not even as yet been revealed?
 
You answered this earlier. HE saved me for His Glory. Why does HE pass over some only Scripture can answer:

Romans 9:20-24
20* Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21. Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22. What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23. And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24. Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?


You need to expand these verses out to get what Apostle Paul is really conveying here:

Romans 9:20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.

26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.



The "vessels fitted for destruction" are us, the Gentiles, who God chose to graft in after the Jews rejected Jesus Christ as their Messiah. The vessels of mercy were the Jews who were God's chosen during the OT times. Now, both Jews and Gentiles, are able to be saved, and placed in Christ by choosing to believe that is Lord, Saviour, and Messiah.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?

Now, let us venture back to the Garden, and I will show you the prettiest picture of the Gospel you could ever think of:

Gen. 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Now, here I can see a symbol of Jesus(Tree of Life), and the Gospel(flaming sword). Now, God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden before they could get to the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever. God then placed the flaming sword betwixt them and the Tree, so the only way back to the Tree of Life would have been for them to go through the flaming sword. It's the same way today. God has His Word, which is what we must live by if we are to ever make it to heaven. For us to get to Jesus, we MUST go through the Gospel, and when we go this route, we partake of the Tree of Life(Jesus), and we will live forever.

That is why Jesus stated these known facts:

John 6:48 I am that bread of life.

49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.


53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.


Just as the Tree of Life in the Garden was Adam's and Eve's only life source, so is Jesus our only life source today. You don't have life unless you are in Jesus, and you also aren't in Jesus if you don't partake of His flesh and blood(spiritually speaking). This is my "bumpersticker theology', and if you don't like it, then that's solely your opinion, and right, to disagree, I guess.

Possibly the most perfectly worded, Scripturally sound and utterly inarguable post I have seen on BB since I joined...Thank You Convicted....

You are decidedly correct with this observation here:

**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?

It's that taking the Word at "face-value" part that somehow seems to escape people....Our Almighty God did not decree the gospel to the wise...but to the simple....and one is a fool to make it more complicated than necessary. :applause::applause::jesus:
 

Luke2427

Active Member

I know you do.:thumbsup:

I think we all need to be reminded what Jesus taught about the Spirit. He said, "The very words I speak to you are spirit and life." (Jn 6) He was referred to as the Truth and the Word. The Spirit likewise is often called the Spirit of Truth. And we all know it is the Truth that shall set you free. And it is the very words of Christ that will judge us on the final day (John 12).

I agree. The Word of God is the means whereby regeneration takes place. You may have thought that I was saying, as some do, that God gives life, then the Word, then there is repentance and salvation, and so on.

That is not what I think the Bible teaches. God gives life BY HIS WORD through his Spirit. "Speak to the dry bones the Word of the Lord and they shall live."

It is the Word of God that awakens the spirit which was born dead in sin. This life matures as the Spirit of God convicts. One man plants another waters but God gives the increase.

I believe you underestimate the power of Christ's words. With them he spoke the world into existence, yet you don't believe they have the power to bring the dead to life?

I hope I have answered this already.

The Gospel, the WORDS of the Spirit, are the powerful means God has chosen to make the appeal for reconciliation and new life. To suggest one must be alive to accept the message of life confounds the clear meaning of the text, "How will they believe unless they hear?"

He has to be alive to accept but he is made alive by the Word spoken to his dead spirit as the Spirit of God breathes that Word over his dead spirit.

For illustrative purpose, it is something like Adam into whom God BREATHED the breath of life and Adam became a living soul.

It is also something like Ezekiel who spoke the Word of God to the dry bones and they lived.

It is also like dead Lazarus to whom Jesus spoke and made alive by his words.

But it is a process.

There is first of all the man who is totally dead in his sins. He cares NOTHING for the things of God. He CANNOT receive (accept) the things of the Spirit of God. He is never subject to the law of God neither indeed can he be. Even his righteousness is as filthy rags. The plowing of this man is sin. The thoughts of his heart are evil only continually. He does not EVER seek after God. He WILL NOT, in his spiritually dead state, come to the light because he loves darkness rather than light.

Then, the Spirit of God blows over the dead spirit of this man with the Word of God. God's Spirit must do this. It is not enough that the Scripture is spoken in the man's presence. That is essential but not sufficient. The seed of the Word can fall on deaf ears. The Spirit of God, which is like the wind which blows whithersoever it will, must supernaturally take the Word and give the man, by it, spiritual ears that he may hear.

Then the seed of the Word, which, as you say, IS life, is planted. Now there is life where there was none. That Word is watered. God gives increase through conviction. All the while, keep in mind, that God is using means. He is using Christian friends and preachers, etc... throughout this whole process.

Does it say they "CAN NOT" even once confronted by the powerful life giving means of God?

No. You are right here.

Do you mean like a life giving powerful message of truth sent by God Himself to make an appeal for reconciliation? Would that be sufficient? Just because someone is able to trade the truth in for lies and turn from God's appeal to life doesn't make it any less 'of God.'

I think we are more clear about what each other understands here.


Yes. Prevenient grace just means 'enabling grace that precedes faith.' Now the question for you is do you believe the gospel is a powerful and gracious work of God's Spirit, or not? If not, why not? If so, why do you assume in isn't sufficient to make an appeal for lost enemies to be reconciled?

Absolutely. But it is not applied universally equally to all. This is clear in the fact that not all are not saved. (Romans 10)

The Word of God is powerful enough through the work of the Spirit to awaken the dead. Where there is no work of the Spirit, there is no life.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?

Willis, Willis. This is the same thing the Pentecostal says about Acts 2. It's the same thing the Jehovah's witness says about Revelation 3:14. It's the same thing the Mormon says about I Corinthians 15:29.

I am not saying you are a heretic here. But understand that this incessant, relentless pursuit for simplicity is an element that gives rise to many cults.

Bumper Sticker theology is almost always wrong.

The Gospel is simple enough for a child to understand but only so far as is necessary to be saved.

Beyond what it takes to be saved it is gloriously, beautifully complex. The problem is that some people have no desire to delve deeper and they lack the humility to admit that there is a TON of stuff that they OUGHT to have learned by now that they have not.
Now, let us venture back to the Garden, and I will show you the prettiest picture of the Gospel you could ever think of:

Gen. 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

This is not the prettiest picture of the Gospel. The cross is.

Now, here I can see a symbol of Jesus(Tree of Life), and the Gospel(flaming sword). Now, God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden before they could get to the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever. God then placed the flaming sword betwixt them and the Tree, so the only way back to the Tree of Life would have been for them to go through the flaming sword. It's the same way today. God has His Word, which is what we must live by if we are to ever make it to heaven. For us to get to Jesus, we MUST go through the Gospel, and when we go this route, we partake of the Tree of Life(Jesus), and we will live forever.

This is, as anybody with half a semester of bible college will tell you, HORRIBLE exegesis.

That is why Jesus stated these known facts:

John 6:48 I am that bread of life.

49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.


53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.


Just as the Tree of Life in the Garden was Adam's and Eve's only life source, so is Jesus our only life source today. You don't have life unless you are in Jesus, and you also aren't in Jesus if you don't partake of His flesh and blood(spiritually speaking). This is my "bumpersticker theology', and if you don't like it, then that's solely your opinion, and right, to disagree, I guess.



Oh, and for proof of the flaming sword as a symbol of the Gospel:

Heb. 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.



Rev. 1:12 And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;

13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.

14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.

More of the same. You can illustrate doctrine this way, but you cannot establish it. That is a terrible hermeneutic. You do not establish doctrine from types and shadows and pictures.

The problem is, Brother Willis, not that you believe these things. The problem is not that you base your beliefs on such terrible handling of the Scripture. The problem is that you promote this stuff when you ought to have the humility to learn proper hermeneutics before you ever even THINK about promoting it on a site such as this where thousands less knowledgeable than yourself could be influenced.

It is like a man hanging a shingle outside his office that says he is a brain surgeon whose only medical knowledge consists of his watching a season of the show "House."

To play with people's brains, knife in hand, when you have no real understanding of how to do so- that is not humility.

When you say stuff like "People aren't sinners until they actually commit sin," and when you say, "Regeneration is the result of every man's own choice because no one is really so sinful that they must be made alive by God's grace in order to believe,"- and then you support such notions on Scriptures you use as types and shadows- that's TERRIBLY presumptuous and dangerous.

It's OK to need to learn. We all do. But it is not OK for you to pretend that all the great doctrines of the faith are simple and can be established by simple proof texting and ESPECIALLY by proof texting passages as types and shadows.

Humility will drive you to say, "Could my brother be right? Maybe I am handling the nuclear power of heaven haphazardly. Maybe I do need to learn a great deal more about the science of Bible study and interpretation before I preach this stuff."

Pride will drive you to be embittered by my admonition and say something smart allek like, "*sigh* Maybe one day we will all be as wise as you."

God bless!
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Possibly the most perfectly worded, Scripturally sound and utterly inarguable post I have seen on BB since I joined...Thank You Convicted....

You are decidedly correct with this observation here:



It's that taking the Word at "face-value" part that somehow seems to escape people....Our Almighty God did not decree the gospel to the wise...but to the simple....and one is a fool to make it more complicated than necessary. :applause::applause::jesus:

I hope you will humbly read post 90.

I honestly believe this demand for the Word of God to be simple in all its teachings is an insult to God.
 

Amy.G

New Member
There is milk and there is meat. The gospel is simple and God designed it that way for the sinner to come with the faith of a child. He rebuked the intellectuals of His day for making the kingdom hard to come into and for burdening people with the 613 laws that were impossible to keep.

On the other hand, the meat of the word is deep and requires diligent study and a mature Christian to comprehend it. I wouldn't call it complicated, instead I would call it intricate and detailed and only the mature (not the intellectual) will be able to digest it.

We should never be satisfied with milk, but yearn for meat. It's in this way that we learn who God is. Who it is that saved us, what we must do to please Him, and grow up into Christ.
 

psalms109:31

Active Member
"But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me. But to Israel he saith, all day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people."—Romans 10:20-21.

DOUBTLESS THESE WORDS primarily refer to the casting away of the Jews, and to the choosing of the Gentiles. The Gentiles were a people who sought not after God, but lived in idolatry; nevertheless, Jehovah was pleased in these latter times to send the gospel of his grace to them: while the Jews who had long enjoyed the privileges of the Word of God, on account of their disobedience and rebellion were cast away. I believe, however, that while this is the primary object of the words of our text, yet, as Calvin says, the truth taught in the text is a type of a universal fact. As God did choose the people who knew him not, so hath he chosen, in the abundance of his grace, to manifest his salvation to men who are out of the way; while, on the other hand, the men who are lost, after having heard the Word, are lost because of their wilful sin; for God doth all the day long "stretch forth his hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people."
The system of truth is not one straight line, but two. No man will ever get a right view of the gospel until he knows how to look at the two lines at once. I am taught in one book to believe that what I sow I shall reap: I am taught in another place, that "it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." I see in one place, God presiding over all in providence; and yet I see, and I cannot help seeing, that man acts as he pleases, and that God has left his actions to his own will, in a great measure. Now, if I were to declare that man was so free to act, that there was no presidence of God over his actions, I should be driven very near to Atheism; and if, on the other hand, I declare that God so overrules all things, as that man is not free enough to be responsible, I am driven at once into Antinomianism or fatalism. That God predestines, and that man is responsible, are two things that few can see. They are believed to be inconsistent and contradictory; but they are not. It is just the fault of our weak judgment. Two truths cannot be contradictory to each other. If, then, I find taught in one place that everything is fore-ordained, that is true; and if I find in another place that man is responsible for all his actions, that is true; and it is my folly that leads me to imagine that two truths can ever contradict each other. These two truths, I do not believe, can ever be welded into one upon any human anvil, but one they shall be in eternity: they are two lines that are so nearly parallel, that the mind that shall pursue them farthest, will never discover that they converge; but they do converge, and they will meet somewhere in eternity, close to the throne of God, whence all truth doth spring.

C.H. Spurgeon

Satan, Lucifer was ordained to be a cherub a guardian, this is what he was anointed for until wickedness was found in him, he went against what he was ordained for and is responsible for his action.

Jesus called messengers to spread His message. It has not changed from the beginning, He ask us to do nothing but trust in Him and be saved.

If they would not of ate from the tree they would not need saving and they did nothing for it, because trust in God and His word isn't work. They wouldn't need saving for what they did not do, not for what they did. We do nothing it is what God does that saves.

Who am I to question God, that He will save those who trust in His Son.

God is very patient if it takes generation after generation perishing for us to spread the message that He sent us out with so be it.

Jeremiah 23 :
16 This is what the Lord Almighty says:

“Do not listen to what the prophets are prophesying to you;
they fill you with false hopes.
They speak visions from their own minds,
not from the mouth of the Lord.
17 They keep saying to those who despise me,
‘The Lord says: You will have peace.’
And to all who follow the stubbornness of their hearts
they say, ‘No harm will come to you.’
18 But which of them has stood in the council of the Lord
to see or to hear his word?
Who has listened and heard his word?
19 See, the storm of the Lord
will burst out in wrath,
a whirlwind swirling down
on the heads of the wicked.
20 The anger of the Lord will not turn back
until he fully accomplishes
the purposes of his heart.
In days to come
you will understand it clearly.
21 I did not send these prophets,
yet they have run with their message;
I did not speak to them,
yet they have prophesied.

22 But if they had stood in my council,
they would have proclaimed my words to my people
and would have turned them from their evil ways
and from their evil deeds.


23 “Am I only a God nearby, ”
declares the Lord,
“and not a God far away?
24 Who can hide in secret places
so that I cannot see them?”
declares the Lord.
“Do not I fill heaven and earth?”
declares the Lord.

25 “I have heard what the prophets say who prophesy lies in my name. They say, ‘I had a dream! I had a dream!’ 26 How long will this continue in the hearts of these lying prophets, who prophesy the delusions of their own minds? 27 They think the dreams they tell one another will make my people forget my name, just as their ancestors forgot my name through Baal worship. 28 Let the prophet who has a dream recount the dream, but let the one who has my word speak it faithfully. For what has straw to do with grain?” declares the Lord. 29 “Is not my word like fire,” declares the Lord, “and like a hammer that breaks a rock in pieces?



God drawn me with loving kindness, He didn't drag me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

psalms109:31

Active Member
God drew me with love as well, but He also got in my face, so in a way He dragged me because I did not want to see what a sinner I was.

It is your testimony, mine is He convicted me of my sins, but His loving kindness is what drawn me. That He would accept me the way I was and it wasn't me who can change me but His Son. That He loved the world me a sinner being a sinner that He sent His Son to save me. I praise God that you are one of His.

Sin is not an obstacle for His loving kindness for Jesus came to save sinners and I am the worst. I pray that our message does not hinder a sinner, but convict of them of their sins to come to the only one who can save them
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Luke2427

Active Member
There is milk and there is meat. The gospel is simple and God designed it that way for the sinner to come with the faith of a child. He rebuked the intellectuals of His day for making the kingdom hard to come into and for burdening people with the 613 laws that were impossible to keep.

On the other hand, the meat of the word is deep and requires diligent study and a mature Christian to comprehend it. I wouldn't call it complicated, instead I would call it intricate and detailed and only the mature (not the intellectual) will be able to digest it.

We should never be satisfied with milk, but yearn for meat. It's in this way that we learn who God is. Who it is that saved us, what we must do to please Him, and grow up into Christ.

I agree. Complicated may not be the right word- complex is. For example, the doctrine of the trinity is very complex.
 

Skandelon

<b>Moderator</b>
You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them.
Yes, and they responded.

You do understand that we were hiding from God and that our sin had separated us from God, but because of his mercy he, God was seeking us...he does so through his ambassadors who are making an appeal to all mankind to be reconciled to God.

God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.

He did not take it away.
Right. And he does the same for whosoever believes.

Can you explain this to OldRegular? ;)
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Can you explain this to OldRegular? ;)

percho did not say anything that I did not say so your comment adds nothing!

Originally Posted by percho
You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them. God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.

Resoonse by OldRegular
Thanks percho for explaining that to Skandelon. I seem to be unable to do so!!
 

Skandelon

<b>Moderator</b>
He has to be alive to accept but he is made alive by the Word spoken to his dead spirit as the Spirit of God breathes that Word over his dead spirit.

So, you believe one is made alive through the preaching of the gospel and then they believe it? But, didn't you argue in another thread sometime ago that someone could be regenerated causing them to seek God, or go to church or ask 'seeker' questions. Don't many people ask these types of question and come under conviction before ever hearing the gospel?

Absolutely. But it is not applied universally equally to all. This is clear in the fact that not all are not saved.
You are kind of begging the question here. You conclude that all are not saved because you assume the 'universal application' would have to be effectual/irresistible. Truth is that we know the gospel is sent to EVERY creature and that "the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men."

The Word of God is powerful enough through the work of the Spirit to awaken the dead. Where there is no work of the Spirit, there is no life.
Is it possible for the Holy Spirit wrought gospel message to be preached by one of His Spirit indwelled ambassadors and the Spirit NOT work? If so, how?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top