OldRegular
Well-Known Member
And yet Heb. 11 has a list of people who were willing, so what's your point? Some are willing and some aren't.
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why some are willing and others are not.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And yet Heb. 11 has a list of people who were willing, so what's your point? Some are willing and some aren't.
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why some are willing and others are not.
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why God is willing to save you and not another.
To tell you WHY a free moral agent makes a choice would be conceding the point up for debate. You assume a deterministic response is necessary.
Why did a chooser make a choice? He is the chooser, so HE is the reason for the choice, period. To suggest something outside the chooser determined his choice makes that thing the chooser. You turn influences and desires into things that are greater than the determining agent.
Why did God create you or me or that ant or this leaf?
You can keep asking why all day long but the answer is always come back to because HE chose to, period.
You are unable to adequately answer the question as to why some are willing and others are not.
That's why you'll never get it. You need things to be WAY too simple.
Your statement above is bogus- thoroughly bogus. The Bible contradicts this thoroughly. But you cling to it because it is extraordinarily simple.
Some people's Bible is not THE Bible- it is the Bumper Sticker Theology Bible.
If it is short and cute and could be placed on a car bumper- THEN BY GOLLY IT MUST BE TRUE!!
But the Word of God is far more glorious than that.
It depends on what you mean when you say "in Christ". You have repeated that phrase over and over in this debate as if it is some tremendous argument against the process of regeneration beginning before repentance- but it is meaningless unless you tell us what you mean by "in Christ". I know the phrase is in the Bible, but what do YOU mean by it? What do you interpret that phrase to mean and why do you think it has anything to do with this debate?
There are numerous passages of Scripture that speak of people who'd be better off if they had never received the knowledge of Christ: II Peter 2, Hebrews 6 and 10, etc...
Jude says of these people that they are "twice dead".
These are people who were made partakers of the Holy Ghost and who have tasted the good word of God and the power of the world to come- but the spirtual life that was planted in their hearts by the Spirit of God withered and died before it came to fruition.
Paul said that the process of salvation works like this- one plants, another waters and God gives the increase. That's an embryonic phase.
Jesus said of one man- "Thou art not FAR from the Kingdom of God" He was not completely in the world, yet he was not yet in the Kingdom. Truth and life was spawning in him.
Like Calvin, I believe there are people who receive a measure of life but come short of the new birth and eternal life. They are twice dead. Born dead and then still born in the spiritual process.
Salvation is instantaneous but there is a beautiful and complex process that brings about that instantaneous moment.
You don't have to agree with that. But what you do have to agree with if you are to be at all intellectually honest about scripture is that NNE seeks after God in their spiritually dead state.
Yes, and God sought them. Apparently you think they couldn't speak to God, converse with him or be reconciled? I guess you think the only reason they got clothes from God and had a discussion with him was because they were regenerated first?
Huh??? I'm not sure what you are talking about. They had a in-depth conversation with God in which he makes them clothes, explains to them the curses (none of which are 'total depravity' btw), and tells them they are now like God in that they know both good and evil.
Plus, that is not even an example of God's effort to make reconciliation with man as we see through the gospel.
You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them. God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.
And yet Heb. 11 has a list of people who were willing, so what's your point? Some are willing and some aren't.
You answered this earlier. HE saved me for His Glory. Why does HE pass over some only Scripture can answer:
Romans 9:20-24
20* Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21. Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22. What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23. And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24. Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?
Now, let us venture back to the Garden, and I will show you the prettiest picture of the Gospel you could ever think of:
Gen. 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
Now, here I can see a symbol of Jesus(Tree of Life), and the Gospel(flaming sword). Now, God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden before they could get to the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever. God then placed the flaming sword betwixt them and the Tree, so the only way back to the Tree of Life would have been for them to go through the flaming sword. It's the same way today. God has His Word, which is what we must live by if we are to ever make it to heaven. For us to get to Jesus, we MUST go through the Gospel, and when we go this route, we partake of the Tree of Life(Jesus), and we will live forever.
That is why Jesus stated these known facts:
John 6:48 I am that bread of life.
49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
Just as the Tree of Life in the Garden was Adam's and Eve's only life source, so is Jesus our only life source today. You don't have life unless you are in Jesus, and you also aren't in Jesus if you don't partake of His flesh and blood(spiritually speaking). This is my "bumpersticker theology', and if you don't like it, then that's solely your opinion, and right, to disagree, I guess.
**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?
I agree.
I think we all need to be reminded what Jesus taught about the Spirit. He said, "The very words I speak to you are spirit and life." (Jn 6) He was referred to as the Truth and the Word. The Spirit likewise is often called the Spirit of Truth. And we all know it is the Truth that shall set you free. And it is the very words of Christ that will judge us on the final day (John 12).
I believe you underestimate the power of Christ's words. With them he spoke the world into existence, yet you don't believe they have the power to bring the dead to life?
The Gospel, the WORDS of the Spirit, are the powerful means God has chosen to make the appeal for reconciliation and new life. To suggest one must be alive to accept the message of life confounds the clear meaning of the text, "How will they believe unless they hear?"
Does it say they "CAN NOT" even once confronted by the powerful life giving means of God?
Do you mean like a life giving powerful message of truth sent by God Himself to make an appeal for reconciliation? Would that be sufficient? Just because someone is able to trade the truth in for lies and turn from God's appeal to life doesn't make it any less 'of God.'
Yes. Prevenient grace just means 'enabling grace that precedes faith.' Now the question for you is do you believe the gospel is a powerful and gracious work of God's Spirit, or not? If not, why not? If so, why do you assume in isn't sufficient to make an appeal for lost enemies to be reconciled?
**Sigh*** Whatever you've got, I don't want it. You want to make a one hundred yard dash into a marathon, when the verses I posted, shows what it says, and it says what it shows. Why is it that hard for you to take the Word at face value?
Now, let us venture back to the Garden, and I will show you the prettiest picture of the Gospel you could ever think of:
Gen. 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
Now, here I can see a symbol of Jesus(Tree of Life), and the Gospel(flaming sword). Now, God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden before they could get to the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever. God then placed the flaming sword betwixt them and the Tree, so the only way back to the Tree of Life would have been for them to go through the flaming sword. It's the same way today. God has His Word, which is what we must live by if we are to ever make it to heaven. For us to get to Jesus, we MUST go through the Gospel, and when we go this route, we partake of the Tree of Life(Jesus), and we will live forever.
That is why Jesus stated these known facts:
John 6:48 I am that bread of life.
49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
Just as the Tree of Life in the Garden was Adam's and Eve's only life source, so is Jesus our only life source today. You don't have life unless you are in Jesus, and you also aren't in Jesus if you don't partake of His flesh and blood(spiritually speaking). This is my "bumpersticker theology', and if you don't like it, then that's solely your opinion, and right, to disagree, I guess.
Oh, and for proof of the flaming sword as a symbol of the Gospel:
Heb. 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Rev. 1:12 And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;
13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.
14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.
Possibly the most perfectly worded, Scripturally sound and utterly inarguable post I have seen on BB since I joined...Thank You Convicted....
You are decidedly correct with this observation here:
It's that taking the Word at "face-value" part that somehow seems to escape people....Our Almighty God did not decree the gospel to the wise...but to the simple....and one is a fool to make it more complicated than necessary. :applause::applause::jesus:
God drew me with loving kindness, He didn't drag me.
God drew me with love as well, but He also got in my face, so in a way He dragged me because I did not want to see what a sinner I was.
There is milk and there is meat. The gospel is simple and God designed it that way for the sinner to come with the faith of a child. He rebuked the intellectuals of His day for making the kingdom hard to come into and for burdening people with the 613 laws that were impossible to keep.
On the other hand, the meat of the word is deep and requires diligent study and a mature Christian to comprehend it. I wouldn't call it complicated, instead I would call it intricate and detailed and only the mature (not the intellectual) will be able to digest it.
We should never be satisfied with milk, but yearn for meat. It's in this way that we learn who God is. Who it is that saved us, what we must do to please Him, and grow up into Christ.
Yes, and they responded.You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them.
Right. And he does the same for whosoever believes.God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.
Can you explain this to OldRegular?
Originally Posted by percho
You do understand that they were hiding from God and that their sin had separated them from God but because of his mercy he, God was seeking them. God initiated the conversation, and covered them. Covered their sin.
He did not take it away.
Resoonse by OldRegular
Thanks percho for explaining that to Skandelon. I seem to be unable to do so!!
He has to be alive to accept but he is made alive by the Word spoken to his dead spirit as the Spirit of God breathes that Word over his dead spirit.
You are kind of begging the question here. You conclude that all are not saved because you assume the 'universal application' would have to be effectual/irresistible. Truth is that we know the gospel is sent to EVERY creature and that "the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men."Absolutely. But it is not applied universally equally to all. This is clear in the fact that not all are not saved.
Is it possible for the Holy Spirit wrought gospel message to be preached by one of His Spirit indwelled ambassadors and the Spirit NOT work? If so, how?The Word of God is powerful enough through the work of the Spirit to awaken the dead. Where there is no work of the Spirit, there is no life.