Andy T. said:Nicholas, you and Johnp are not saying the same thing.
Can you explain the difference? Does Johnp think God can sin, or lie? I don't get that impression from his posts.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Andy T. said:Nicholas, you and Johnp are not saying the same thing.
Yes, he does. He denies that humans have wills of their own. He believes that God's will is what is working when a human wills to sin. In other words, God is forcing man to sin. Ergo, God sins. I'm sure Johnp will protest my conclusion - he'll probably say that to God, it is not sin, because he can do what he wants to, including violate his own holiness.npetreley said:Can you explain the difference? Does Johnp think God can sin, or lie? I don't get that impression from his posts.
Non sequitur. Even if God forces a man to sin, that is not the same thing as God sinning. God making a man sin means God is making a man disobey Him. God sinning would mean God disobeys Himself. Two very different things.Andy T. said:In other words, God is forcing man to sin. Ergo, God sins.
He who hires a hitman is guilty of murder.npetreley said:Non sequitur. Even if God forces a man to sin, that is not the same thing as God sinning. God making a man sin means God is making a man disobey Him. God sinning would mean God disobeys Himself. Two very different things.
Reconcile that notion with the fact the Bible state that God doesn't even tempt man?npetreley said:Non sequitur. Even if God forces a man to sin, that is not the same thing as God sinning. God making a man sin means God is making a man disobey Him. God sinning would mean God disobeys Himself. Two very different things.
npetreley said:Non sequitur. Even if God forces a man to sin, that is not the same thing as God sinning. God making a man sin means God is making a man disobey Him. God sinning would mean God disobeys Himself. Two very different things.
I can agree with his premise, that God is the ultimate cause behind all things. What I'm not sure about is, does he give credence to the role of our sinful nature?
Wrong. He punished them for doing what they chose to do...He didn't "ordain" their sin at all. He uses even our sin to bring about His glory and purpose, but He doesn't "ordain" our sin.They do their dirty deeds including raping and general wickedness . Then the Lord punishes them for doing what He ordained them to do
Using a creature with the natural tendency TO sin (lie) is NOT the same as God making a person sin to do what He wants.
He has contended numerous times (and correct me if I'm wrong Johnp) that man only does what God makes each man to do whether for good or evil. God is soveriegn and therefore every sin is detemined and enforced by God upon (or making) the man to whom He ordained to do it fulfill Gods desire of each specific sin. If man can choose to sin then God is not soveriegn... Is that about right Johnp??
Probably not the best analogy to Johnp's theology, because God would be the conspirer and the hitman.
Ultimately, this warped theology ends up being a kind of pantheism - that God is everything.
Reconcile that notion with the fact the Bible state that God doesn't even tempt man?
I doubt that any Calvinist disagrees with this as it's stated here. Nothing is accomplished by mere permission. Sinful acts are accomplished by the "will and decree of God" in conjunction with the permission of the evil deed. But reading your posts has made me think that it isn't just mere permission you object to, but any suggestion that permission has a part in God's accomplishment of evil deeds.johnp. said:Even the seemingly insignificant cannot occur without, not merely the permission, but the active will and decree of God
In other words, it seems that you have God the active agent in sinful acts in exactly the same way he's the active agent in righteous acts.
Doctrines of demons.