But that would fall under "thoughtcrime".Sure they show up under the auspices of peaceful protest but we all know that is the furthest thing from their mind.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But that would fall under "thoughtcrime".Sure they show up under the auspices of peaceful protest but we all know that is the furthest thing from their mind.
Yes. Please read the modification which followed. (government control of the means of production by way of tariffs). You can't deny that Congress placed tariffs on exported cotton and imported industrial machinery.Northern socialists?
Sure they were, if they could buy the industrial machinery then needed and pay for it by selling cotton. But they could not sell cotton to France at a good price because Congress passed tariffs which resulted in having to sell to the north at half the profit. And Congress passed tariffs which resulted on imported machinery costing twice as much as machinery purchased from the north forcing the south to buy their machinery at inflated prices.The Southerners were free to start their own factories to produce cloth and everything else.
But that would fall under "thoughtcrime".
So you can tell what the counter protesters did to cause someone to run over people with a speeding car? I'd like to know.I side with the right to peacefully assemble and demonstrate. I don't care if its the Klan or the Panthers. The counter demonstrators sparked the violence. As I said, I have worked several Klan rallies. They always complied fully with the rules of their permit. The counter demonstrators always caused the problems. Smart people would have ignored them.
I'm not sure I understand your objection. How does being legally armed equal intent to not be peaceable? I went to church this morning. I was armed (as I always am). How did my being armed equal the intent to not be peaceful?No one said they did but if you are subscribing to the peaceful protest mindset then you aren't being honest with yourself.
So would I. And so far we don't know what his motives were. All we have is a lot of speculation which, usually, reinforces previously held opinions.So you can tell what the counter protesters did to cause someone to run over people with a speeding car? I'd like to know.
No, but his treaty partner, Communist China, could. JohnDeerFan got it right.Fat boy would never be able to launch a retaliation.
Red China is the last bear we want to poke, and a preemptive strike on North Korea would be the grandfather of all pokes.You can only poke a bear for so long until it turns on you.
Surprised you need the 2nd amendment pointed out to you.Surprised you need that pointed out to you
Yes. Please read the modification which followed. (government control of the means of production by way of tariffs). You can't deny that Congress placed tariffs on exported cotton and imported industrial machinery.
Sure they were, if they could buy the industrial machinery then needed and pay for it by selling cotton. But they could not sell cotton to France at a good price because Congress passed tariffs which resulted in having to sell to the north at half the profit. And Congress passed tariffs which resulted on imported machinery costing twice as much as machinery purchased from the north forcing the south to buy their machinery at inflated prices.
Interesting observation. I had an old friend, an Army General and retired Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff make an equally interesting observation.Had we won the Korean war, we would not be having this discussion today.
I know what the 2nd Amendment says. And I don't think it permits paramilitary terrorist organisations to organise and arm themselves in American soil. Unless you think ISIS should be allowed to 'bear arms' in the US too?Surprised you need the 2nd amendment pointed out to you.
We didn't because God is Sovereignly raising up China and Russia for His glorious purpose.Interesting observation. I had an old friend, an Army General and retired Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff make an equally interesting observation.
If the US leadership had listened to General Patton toward the end of WWII, when he said we should go after Russia and defeat them while we still could, there would have been no Cold War, and no Korea. If, after Korea, we had listened to General MacArthur and invaded China there would have been no Vietnam. And without Vietnam we would not be where we are today.
We just never learn. We want our Generals to fight our wars, but we won't let them win them. The only exception was General Schwarzkopf and the first Gulf War when they gave him his head and he won the war in 100 hours.
The reality of the situation is that the KKK is definitely wrong, but the opposition is often just as wrong but weak enough to be provoked into confrontation.I'm not talking about a legal standpoint here, I'm just saying what that is the reality of the situation.
The counterprotesters started the physical violence.So you can tell what the counter protesters did to cause someone to run over people with a speeding car? I'd like to know.
Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Klan never initiates the violence. They legally incite it, but never initiate it.Sure they show up under the auspices of peaceful protest but we all know that is the furthest thing from their mind.
China will not retaliate. They understand MAD. They are not nut jobs like Un.No, but his treaty partner, Communist China, could. JohnDeerFan got it right.
Red China is the last bear we want to poke, and a preemptive strike on North Korea would be the grandfather of all pokes.
Defeating China would have been part of winning the Korean war. They attacked us in Korea. That opened up the war to include them.Interesting observation. I had an old friend, an Army General and retired Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff make an equally interesting observation.
If the US leadership had listened to General Patton toward the end of WWII, when he said we should go after Russia and defeat them while we still could, there would have been no Cold War, and no Korea. If, after Korea, we had listened to General MacArthur and invaded China there would have been no Vietnam. And without Vietnam we would not be where we are today.
We just never learn. We want our Generals to fight our wars, but we won't let them win them. The only exception was General Schwarzkopf and the first Gulf War when they gave him his head and he won the war in 100 hours.
And just when, exactly, do you think the KKK or BLM was adjudicated to be a "paramilitary terrorist organization." Please supply docket number, court, and decision.I know what the 2nd Amendment says. And I don't think it permits paramilitary terrorist organisations to organise and arm themselves in American soil. Unless you think ISIS should be allowed to 'bear arms' in the US too?