Great minds think alike! (But not too much alike! - referring to my post #17.)I would be parroting almost word for word what TC has already said.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Great minds think alike! (But not too much alike! - referring to my post #17.)I would be parroting almost word for word what TC has already said.
I do maintain that in scripture Israel and the gentiles have been distinct in times past....but God has made a change now.
If you mean John MacArthur, he's a dispensationalist.Even John M says how you view Israel determines how you view your eschatology
Yes...maybe I am showing my age, but this was what I was first taught. I used to look forward to hearing John MacArthur teach on these things.If you mean John MacArthur, he's a dispensationalist.
Distinguishing between Israel and the church is one of Ryrie's "sine qua non" characteristics of dispensationalism (pp. 45-48).
Each of these portions of scripture have to answered.16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice: and they shall become one flock, one shepherd. Jn 10
14 For he is our peace, who made both one, and brake down the middle wall of partition,
15 having abolished in the flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; that he might create in himself of the two one new man, so making peace; Eph 2
15 For neither is circumcision anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
16 And as many as shall walk by this rule, peace be upon them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God. Gal 6
This is one of the areas in which I part company with both sides.Distinguishing between Israel and the church is one of Ryrie's "sine qua non" characteristics of dispensationalism (pp. 45-48).
Absolutely not. To tell all the ways this differs would take too long, but I'll discuss just one. (Sigh. Now you've drawn me into it. )
would this be the mainstream teaching???
Interesting. Wish I had time to discuss it with you. Can't today.This is one of the areas in which I part company with both sides.
I see National Israel as being distinct from the "Church" but see Spiritual Israel as the Olive Tree, the Gates through the Wall of the Heavenly City, and God again dealing with National Israel through tribulation while saying that some (perhaps many) of the Old Testament promises made to Israel are being fulfilled in the "Church" which Paul calls "The Israel of God."
But maintaining that distinction is often difficult as the line between the two is often blurred.
This statement marks this guy (who I've never heard of) as a hyper-dispensationalist. No one in the mainstream starts the Church Age after the book of Acts.The present dispensation is thus that of the Church of the Mystery. It begins after the time of Acts, and will end before the restoration of Israel as the people of God and the coming of "the day of the Lord" which ends the present eon. During all of this period there is a break in the realization of the prophecies, our dispensation having been completely unknown to the prophets.
I believe John 14, Ephesians 2, and Galatians 6 are referring to the unity of believers in the New Testament economy. There will not be a Jewish Church and a Gentile Church but we will all be members of One Family (of God) One Body, with One Lord, One Faith, and One Baptism.Each of these portions of scripture have to answered.
As far as I've read, JM and his guys are pretty mainstream. His school has produced some dispensationalist authors whose articles I've read.Yes...maybe I am showing my age, but this was what I was first taught. I used to look forward to hearing John MacArthur teach on these things.
Are these men representative of the core of the teaching?
Are they still considered mainstream?
I really don't think Larkin should be classified as hyper.and the Hyper Dispensationalism of Larkin
Seeing how the answers are offered proves quite interesting.
Okay thanks.....I have always heard it as dispensations also.....I still have my classic charts with seven dispensations...Absolutely not. To tell all the ways this differs would take too long, but I'll discuss just one. (Sigh. Now you've drawn me into it. )
No one mainstream uses the term "eon" for starters. Dispensationalism is not about "ages" but about "dispensations," meaning stewardships. God gives a dispensation for His glory, man fails, God judges, God gives a new dispensation. In the mainstream, there are seven.
I agree.....each of these men tried to solve the biblical puzzle. I personally think we should give them a fair hearing. If they go beyond the norm, that can be pointed out without looking to discredit the man.I really don't think Larkin should be classified as hyper.
I draw a distinction between "hyper" and "ultra." I don't think Larkin is in (or anywhere near) the Bullinger/Ruckman position. (Ruckman can find more "dispensations" in the book of Acts than I can find in the whole bible!)I really don't think Larkin should be classified as hyper.