convicted1
Guest
If you hold to Lordship Salvation, wouldn't you be more comfortable in a Reformed Baptist church?
I probably wouldn't, to be honest. But, if He led me there, I'd go licketty-split.
What is the "big ta-doo" about LS???
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If you hold to Lordship Salvation, wouldn't you be more comfortable in a Reformed Baptist church?
No, and neither will mine, as she was born with Downs' Syndrome. To claim these will not know heaven because they can't understand the gospel is to deny who God is.
but what about if alzheimer's sets in as an adult, or amnesia. take a close look at the following verses:
1 Cor. 15:1-2
1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
it might be argued that they "accepted" Christ while they were in full possession of their faculties so the memory loss or impairment doesn't affect their salvation at all.
but the verse said: IF ye keep in memory.
uh, oh.
somebody's in trouble.
I don't know. Logically a case can be made from what I said - that the atonement is limited to the "elect".
But a case can also be made from scripture which says the opposite, that it is available to all.
I think we can all agree that there is no limit to the power of the blood of Christ to take away sin both in kind and number.
This is why I shrink from "limited atonement" especially in light of John 3:16.
We are told to test the spirits.
If a person's life is producing the fruit of the Spirit (which the flesh cannot produce) then in my mind that outweighs the C&A controversy concerning whether one holds to limited or universal atonement.
If you held a gun to my head I would go with universal atonement but limited appropriation.
HankD
I probably wouldn't, to be honest. But, if He led me there, I'd go licketty-split.
What is the "big ta-doo" about LS???
Salzer....my sister was an innocent...a girl that was brain damaged. She could not hear and understand the gospel. Should she be religated to hell for that disability?
Perhaps the question should be best posed to all the Calvinists that call us Hyper-Calvinists because of our Temporal Salvation stance.
Perhaps the question should be best posed to all the Calvinists that call us Hyper-Calvinists because of our Temporal Salvation stance.
Please define "temporal salvation" for me. I honestly wanna know more about it, an honest and sincere question I ask...
Would say that Election is based upon the will of God towards the sinners jesus died to atone for directly, and that those sinners will ahve the Holy Spirit apply the effectual garce of god rrequired to have spiritually dead persons become spiritually alive again in jesus!
UNTIL that point in time, ALL of us still sinners, dead in sins and tresgressions...
the elect know that were ONLY after getting saved by the Lord!
Well, all thsoe whom God chose to elect unto eternal life will hear and believe in this lifetime, right?
if they have not been born again while living, will not get so once physically dead!
Good news though is that every one Go dintends to get saved will somehow hear and respond!
And those such as babies aborted, infants, brain damaged etc will get saved by his grace and compassion, will not the judge of the whole earth do what is right?
don't PB hold that the elect will get saved regardless if they even hear the message, as already been redeemed by Cross, and that the main difference is that while all the elect go to heaven, only some believe in jesus here and now, and experience the Lord now in their lives?
True to form, no spell check, not one iota of scripture to back it up.
Have you not read through the thread first and thought first before posting? Again, true to form.
Do you know ANY NT passage that even hints that one can get saved who has not received Jesus thru faith then?
Are the lost saved until they get saved then by God, wouldn't that be like preaching to the already saved to get them saved?
No, and neither will mine, as she was born with Downs' Syndrome. To claim these will not know heaven because they can't understand the gospel is to deny who God is.
Please define "temporal salvation" for me. I honestly wanna know more about it, an honest and sincere question I ask...
Please define "temporal salvation" for me. I honestly wanna know more about it, an honest and sincere question I ask...
You can mostly answer your own question by taking stock of how much better off you are now as compared to before you came to Christ.
IMHO, a clean conscience is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, benefit to be had from gospel obedience.
Do you know ANY NT passage that even hints that one can get saved who has not received Jesus thru faith then?
Are the lost saved until they get saved then by God, wouldn't that be like preaching to the already saved to get them saved?
.......
wouldn't that be like preaching to the already saved to get them saved?
Correct me if I'm wrong but PB's believe to enter into the kingdom of God is to join the PB church. So when you say a child of God is walking in disobedience and can be in false religion you are meaning churches other than PB.