I don't think there is a 'should be' answer. There is no right or wrong time frame. I normally preach about 35 minutes. It suits our church and I normally am able to get the point across. I have finished in as little as 25 minutes and have gone as long as about 50 minutes. I don't think the 25 minute message a sermonette and I don't think the 50 minute message was dragged out.
We could use a little bit of liberty on this topic.
Take all the liberty & time you want. my question origionally was not geared for traditional church service anyway, it was geared to all those who have fallen away. One of the reasons given to the falling away (and there were many) was that the sermons dragged on & on & on & on without any beginning, middle & end given to it ..... and seemingly no point. As we know, that could happen but mostly the pastor has prepared for a meaningful message. I personally cant tolerate meandering & endless personal stories.....but not everyone does this. Again, my agenda was to find a proper timetable for those WHO HAVE FALLEN AWAY.....not the normal walking around church crowd. They are "conditioned" to put up with 35 minutes to an hour.
But Nodak made a point. What about the guys with prostate problems, the mother with her kids in the pews, the farmer with his livestock needing care, the old woman with hemorrhoids yada yada yada.....you know, they really have needs. So lets consider these poor souls as well. Try staying in some type of reasonable timetable will ya? And if your answer is no, fine then.....let me know that up front & I will find a place that does consider it important to keep up a boundary. ... malcontent that I am. :tongue3: