KJB1611reader
Member
Both about reign, not all same reign.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am a KJBO Independent Fundamental Dispesationlist Baptist
- Thread starter KJB1611reader
- Start date
37818
Well-Known Member
So not the same person?
Freakin insane!
And what is Scofieldism pray tell? How about straight outa the can Christianity? Damn, where do these people come from?
clearly you miss understand the thinking process. Probably Cultic.
KJB1611reader
Member
Maybe not, maybe yes. Do all kings and people in Bible all have only one named that?
Did he reign twice? Was he co-reigent. Note: David also was made king and made king officially.
KJB1611reader
Member
Dispensationalism? Zionism?
37818
Well-Known Member
.
What I understand is, the Hebrew for 2 Chronicles 22:2 had been charged. It currently translates as "fourty" but should translate as "twenty."
KJB1611reader
Member
Not all the Hebrew manuscripts is 22 or 42.
It should not be translated 22 here, and there is many explainations given online.
KJB1611reader
Member
I noticed that Biblegateway's Wycliffe have bracketed text; there is two editons of the Wyc. So, there was an option for them to go with the Wyclif version with 22 but they rejected it.
There are many times the kings men rejected everything and went back to the Wyc.
Shawn
There are many times the kings men rejected everything and went back to the Wyc.
Shawn
KJB1611reader
Member
Update: the Wycliffe had 22 in the first printing and was changed to 42 in the revision.
I'm IFB as well, and I agree with you except with the KJVO myth. First, it's KJV, NOT "KJB" ! Second, it is NOT perfect! One error that's especially glaring, is "Easter" in Acts 12:4. And there's NO SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT for the KJVO myth. (Please don't say "Psalm 12:6-7". That's been discussed & debunked many times on this page.
KJB1611reader
Member
Hello,
I believe the King James Bible.
Easter is right: first, Easter is pagan and second - Passover isn't fallen on same day as ressurection.
King James Bible is perfect.
Shawn
With all due respect, Shawn, you're simply wrong. The Greek 'pascha' is a transliteration of the Hebrew "p'sach", the word GOD used for passover. Pascha is the word JESUS used for passover. Besides, Easter didn't exist before Luke wrote "Acts". And Acts 12:3 says that the days of unleavened bread were then ongoing, which shows it was PASSOVER. The notion that the KJV is perfect is phony as a Ford Corvette.
37818
Well-Known Member
Tyndale's English translation of the New Testament introduced Easter for Passover. And Tyndale invented the English word Passover when he later translated its Old Testament Hebrew text.
I am a Reformed Baptist
Which King James edition then, as hundreds of differences between the 1611, 1769. 1873 etc