Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Like all who came before us...The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.]
The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.]
The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.
Yes, Christ did die a Covenant death for the elect. Heb.2:16
He saves each and every one of them. Jn6:37
He is not willing that any perish.2pet3:9
Those elected were sinners rom5:
6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.
8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Romans 5 is speaking of the justified elect who have come to Jesus, they now have peace with God.
I am not a Calvinist. I must say that the one liners that get thoroughly recycled in an attempt to discredit Calvinism are all easily refuted.The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.]
[Note: Those who do not ascribe to limited atonement believe all those passages apply to the unlimited atonement.]Yes, Christ did die a Covenant death for the elect. Heb.2:16
He saves each and every one of them. Jn6:37
He is not willing that any perish.2pet3:9
Those elected were sinners rom5:
6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.
8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Romans 5 is speaking of the justified elect who have come to Jesus, they now have peace with God.
[Note: Those who do not ascribe to limited atonement believe all those passages apply to the unlimited atonement.]
Yeah, the unsaved do not believe Romans 5:8, ". . . But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. . . ." Which Paul wrote to the church in Rome Christians, which included himself. And unless one some how presumes "we" applies also to one's self as well. The understanding of an unlimited atonement would allow that belief.They do so without biblical support as is easily proven;
5 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
The unsaved have no peace, they are not justified
The full Calvinist must believe the same unlimited atonement passages as everyone else. Since such passages only apply to those who believe those passages anyway.I am not a Calvinist. I must say that the one liners that get thoroughly recycled in an attempt to discredit Calvinism are all easily refuted.
Even though it is easily answered in Calvinistic doctrine, does it matter?
U and I make how irrelevant.
Yeah, the unsaved do not believe Romans 5:8, ". . . But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. . . ." Which Paul wrote to the church in Rome Christians, which included himself. And unless one some how presumes "we" applies also to one's self as well. The understanding of an unlimited atonement would allow that belief.
Read and heard the message of the Gospel, and believed in the Lord Jesus to save me from my sins!The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.]
Ok. They don't have to agree with your interpretation of it.The full Calvinist must believe the same unlimited atonement passages as everyone else. Since such passages only apply to those who believe those passages anyway.
same way all saved do, by hearing and believing that Jesus was and is Lord!The question.
How did you discover Christ died for you? [Since Christ only died for those whom He is to save.]
It always strikes me as odd when people claim they only accept some points but not all. It's like saying I only drive a car with four wheels, but no steering wheel or no engine. It's like saying the human body can work without one of the systems. "I like the circulation system, the nervous system, but I don't like digestive system." No one would do that. You need all systems.IDK if I'm a Calvinist or not. I always have to research what he preached ... "I'ma 4 pointer" is what I've heard my Pops say .... then I'd have to investigate (again)
I just believe God's Word.
I am also persuaded that human pride just has a hard time accepting that we can do nothing to save ourselves!It always strikes me as odd when people claim they only accept some points but not all. It's like saying I only drive a car with four wheels, but no steering wheel or no engine. It's like saying the human body can work without one of the systems. "I like the circulation system, the nervous system, but I don't like digestive system." No one would do that. You need all systems.
Remember that the 5 points of Calvinism were a counter response to the 5 points of the Remonstrants (disciples of Arminius). Calvin never broke his observations of the Bible down to 5 essential points of salvation. His disciples in Holland did this.
It seems that many people cannot wrap their mind around Jesus atonement being only effective for those who believe precisely because God chooses to have mercy on some and not on others. Ultimately the battle is in each person's mind as to how much they will demand from God that they have sovereign control over their salvation. Will a human submit to the idea that they are utterly incapable of doing anything to save themselves, including choosing YHWH over any other gods? Will a human admit they were utterly defeated and hopelessly enslaved in chains and only Christ Jesus could unlock the key?
It doesn't matter if one "accepts" that the chains are off and they walk out of the jail cell. It matters that Jesus has unshackled them and set them free.
The life after being set free is the process of escaping the prison of sin. The escape is not the cause of the salvation, it is the effect of the salvation.
just to clarify ... that statement was never in a serious theological discussion to substantiate any "ism" ... and I won't take it personal you think one of my father's off hand statements is odd.It always strikes me as odd
It happened during the time of the Apostles.just to clarify ... that statement was never in a serious theological discussion to substantiate any "ism" ... and I won't take it personal you think one of my father's off hand statements is odd.
He is a disciple of Jesus Christ ... absent from the body and present with the Lord. I was blessed with being there when it happened.
I find it odd how we tend to label things with the name of someone we think is credible. But I never hear "Lukeism" Just The Gospel according to Luke.
Well, that is how you have come to interpret the whole of the New Testament on the atonement. It is not clear without an unlimited atonement how anyone can include one's self in it prior to believing in an atonement to include one's self.Are you just being obtuse on purpose?
He did not just write one verse to them on a postcard, He wrote the whole book.
Chapter 5 is speaking to the justified by faith. If you do not want to read it, stop asking questions about it. It is not written to be applied to the unsaved who desire to remain in rebellion to God.
There is no unlimited atonement passage anywhere, as the atonement is a Covenant transaction