Who is this directed to and what does it have to do with the discussion?Now, now, Teddy. Compassion and grace, remember?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Who is this directed to and what does it have to do with the discussion?Now, now, Teddy. Compassion and grace, remember?
Correct.
It's the fact that it isn't actually true which makes it untrue.
Who is this directed to and what does it have to do with the discussion?
But you address somebody named "Teddy." I don't know of any "Teddy" on the forum, so who were you addressing?The name in the quote box is "TCassidy", so I would assume that would be you.
What buddy of mine? The only person on the forum I would call a "buddy" is one I have met in person at least a couple times. And as far as I know that is limited to just a couple people. Dr. Bob, and Van.By the way, did you notice that your buddy is back at his old tricks?
By your own admission what "transpired" is, that God has so Sovereignly chosen at this point in time to not reveal for his own glorious purposes his marvelous works of sanctifying grace upon him. It is God's most wise counsel, and for his glory that your friend remain ignorant of the glorious doctrines of Grace which he has chosen to reveal to you. You have now admittedly expressed a desire which is (at least to date, and possibly forever) contrary to his greatest glory....his blessing.
God reserves the right to bless and condemn only in the secret places which belong to him alone, and to which you are not privy what is most suitable for his purposes. It might very well be that God, in his most perfect will has absolutely contrary desires than that which you admittedly express. You "wish" something God might very well have, in his own counsel decided against...
Happily, you fight against the pricks.
Those are according to his most mighty and perfect will, and, you, by definition, are wishing that which is contrary to his perfect will in grace.
Don't get mad at me.
It's your doctrine, not mine.
I understand the concept just fine.Yes it is... And apparently you do not understand the concept of Sovereign Grace... He is a Christian... And he HAS been changed... All the evidence is there... He's a chosen vessel... He belongs to Christ!... Is that plain enough for you from a Calvinist?... This Calvinist anyway!... Brother Glen
So you are saying that Paul made a mistake in 1 Cor 15?
Did God cause Adam's sin?
Read Thatbrian's statement:
He is being consistent here by believing this, which makes one ponder why he would even start such a thread.
Brian... I'm not here to change your mind but I thought you and the other brethren of our ilk would get a kick out of this encounter I had... I was discussing scripture with a non-cal when he threw up his arms and said:... I don't know about you CALVINIST!... You're Contrary!... Pigheaded!... Hardheaded!... Bullheaded!... Cantankerous!... Ornery and Argumentative!... And I'm done talking to you!... As he was swiftly walking away, I hollered... GOD BLESS YOU!... Brother Glen
Which is an example of you "kicking against the pricks" if that is not God's will.
God may have absolutely no desire in his Sovereign and perfect plan to "bless" him with the sanctifying grace he has bestowed upon you and therefore you have simply admitted that you have audibly wished and repeated what might be absolutely contrary to God's perfect Holy Will, which he has decreed for his glory.
It might very well be that God is most magnified by your friends ignorance such that he may demonstrate his glory to us at his eschaton.....as he sits in corrective judgement against his foolhardiness.
And yet...
Contrary to God's revealed word, you have well-wished an heretic Godspeed:
II John 1: 10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
...Good to know that Calvinists are as staunch on defying Scripture as ever
I don't have it backwards.You've got it completely backward. I did not say that was the Calvinist position. What I meant was that in HIS worldview, that is the case. If HE is consistent then that's the view HE should be espousing. I was urging HIM to be consistent with HIS view, not explaining mine.
I don't have it backwards.
I must not have explained myself sufficiently.
It is only consistent for a non-Calvinist to attempt to "convince" a Calvinist of his position.
It is inconsistent for a Calvinist to insist on being "convinced". Hence my puzzlement that you would start such a thread.
I'm pretty sure we are saying the same thing Brian.
Relax.
It is only consistent for a non-Calvinist to attempt to "convince" a Calvinist of his position.
It is inconsistent for a Calvinist to insist on being "convinced".
Funny!
My very semi-Pelagian friend introduced me to his pastor, and to my surprise, right after we shook hands, my friend said to his pastor, "he's a Calvinist" (referring to me). The pastor, with a very disapproving look on his face, said, "well, all we can do is pray that God changes him". I replied, oh, you are a Calvinist too!
First, I didn't start this thread because I literally thought that someone would change my mind.
Second, Calvinists do believe that men can be convinced by arguments. Calvinism is not fatalism. Men preach, teach, persuade, pray. . .
If all the "elect" have been predestined to their salvation even before the foundation of this world, how can any arguments or reasoning ever mean anything?