1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Inter-Denominational Fellowship

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Bible Thumpin n Gun Totin, Nov 8, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Can you please show me what in the world in heretical in these points?????!!!
     
  2. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    No, I can't show you anything. God will have to do that! I will point out what I believe is heretical though. There is no "universal" church in scriptures. There is no baptism in the Spirit in the sense of immersing one spiritually "in Christ." We are "created in Christ" spiritually by new birth/quickening and all born again people are in one family - the family of God by birth not by any kind of baptism or membership in any kind of church. Those "in Adam" are "in the flesh' because they were "born of the flesh" not baptized into Adam. Those "in Christ" are "in the Spirit" because they were "born of the Spirit" not baptized into Christ.

    The church of the New Testament cannot precede its own "foundation" which consists of apostles and then prophets in that order as gifted men that were first and second "set it" it. Hence, the church does not precede the earthly ministry of Christ. They are confusing the church with the family of God and thereby perverting Biblical salvation as their doctrine denies anyone prior to Pentecost was "in Christ" and there is no salvation of any kind for anyone outside of Christ (Acts 4:12; Jn. 14:6).

    It leaves baptism undefined and thus regards wet people as baptized when they are not. Where there is no true baptism there is no true churches. Find any congregation of unbaptized believers in scripture?
     
    #42 The Biblicist, Nov 19, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2016
  3. utilyan

    utilyan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2016
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    293

    Its funny you would declare disfellowshipping and candlestick removal.

    Being that they were once saved. Eternal Security Card now goes into play.

    They were already saved BEFORE.

    License to Sin. It doesn't matter who does what. Even error of doctrine, since practicing proper doctrine isn't the deciding factor.


    You can play a hand that says they never had it to begin with. But then you have to fumble back this disfellowship and candlestick removal.

    In other words you can't kick someone out the church who has never been in the church.


    That's like I a Catholic say well I'm kick you out the Catholic church.


    Absurd being that the only way IN the church is being BORN AGAIN.


    Bottom line. YOU don't even believe in eternal security cause if you did you'd act like it.

    Warning other churches they have to do "right" rather then "WRONG".

    So now they have to do good works to be legit! What happened to faith alone?

    Its like your hitting every branch down the I TOLD YOU SO TREE!
     
  4. utilyan

    utilyan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2016
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    293
    If for a minute I believed that Good Works would be of no benefit towards salvation and that only GOD can provide election/faith to SAVE you once and for all.

    I would not bother with none of ya'll.

    My day would go like this..............
    Lord those folks, I ask of you father please elect them, give them faith, and guide them to salvation, AMEN!


    And that is it! That is a ACTUAL belief that only GOD can fix it.



    Now someone in a church starts teaching wrong doctrine. If they are already saved doesn't matter, He can't' HELP or HINDER anyone else, because its on God anyways.

    And if He's not saved. Well there is nothing I can do! Again we go back to praying to God, Dear Lord can you find it in your heart to fix this guy with election/faith/ect.


    Your in your house......It starts to rain.......do you open an umbrella? You think that's ridiculous?


    If after clearly understanding that direct divine intervention is required for a person's salvation, understanding of scripture, correction ect..... I would have to be STUPID to appeal to the sinner rather then God concerning his salvation. I would have to be DUMB to believe a church buddy teaching the wrong thing puts anyone in jeopardy.
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    To me a denial of the eternal security of the believer is a denial of the finished work of Christ on the Cross. It is also the advancement of a works-based salvation (God gets you there but you have to work to stay there). That is why I am not a Freewill Baptist.

    But at the same time I think I have to keep in mind that many (if not most) of those who hold to free-will convictions do not arrive at what would be my conclusion. I think that they do not follow their doctrine to its logical end….which may just be their saving grace.

    By fellowship I do not, BTW, mean accepting or sitting under their teachings. But I do mean worship. I mean fellowship in Christ despite what would divide in terms of doctrine (fellowship as churches under the gospel – the same “baptism” – without compromising those divisions that form doctrinal bounds and establish a distinctiveness between the churches). For example, I have friends in a southern gospel group (they are Nazarene). I strongly disagree with their doctrine, but they are believers. I went to a Baptist church (one that didn’t hold the same soteriological views as my church) to worship with them in song. I have no problem worshipping my Father alongside his other children even when we disagree in doctrine. We unite in Christ, in the gospel. This is what I mean by fellowship – again, not sharing doctrine but coming together to glorify God instead of tearing at one another in an attempt to judge the servant of Another.
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That reminds me of a story. A great flood came and a man was trapped on the top of his roof, praying to God for deliverance. A boat came along and the man refused…..:D
     
  7. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That's because the Southern Baptist Convention is a convention of local autonomous churches. I suspect that you actually never let the SBC because churches, not individuals, form the convention. But I do understand. I also wish, sometimes, for a governing Church authority to police the doctrine of local churches, and even to the "convention" to a tighter standard. But then I remember that we are Baptist and that was the role of the "Church" in Rome. Still, I am not sure that the pattern of governance of the early church counsels is such a bad idea. I just think it'd lead to corruption in the end (and again, it wouldn't really be "Baptist").
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    You know that story can be applied in reverse as well.
     
  9. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    I worked in the upper levels of the SBC rubbing shoulders with the leadership and saw the politics first hand. In the lower levels of what you call "autonomous" churches I saw the power plays of area missionaries upon congregations first hand. I was called to the ministry in an SBC church, married an SBC girl, went to an SBC Seminary and so I understand the SBC fairly well.
     
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My church is a Southern Baptist church. In what ways do you believe the SBC exerts authority over our church?
     
  11. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    I know nothing about your particular church. I do know about the particular church I was a member in, and when we were without a Pastor, they supplied us an interim pastor that the majority of the church liked and was considering to call. However, that displeased the area missionary who directly inferred by contacting certain members and turned them against the man because he was a sickly man who could not mow the laws and he read his sermons. I and another man of the church confronted the area missionary and asked him to butt out of our businesss but he did not. It discourged some members in somuch that some left. The structure of the SBC is unbiblical as far as I am concerned and lends to concentrating too much power in too few of people. I was part of the SBC between 1974-1982.
     
  12. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Do you deal with religions according to how they arrive at their conclusions or according to what you know the bible clearly teaches? Is the bible or sincerity and/or ignorance the basis for defining error? It seems that some on this forum think they should not treat error as error because people are either sincere in their error or sincere in arriving at the error.
     
  13. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Oh so you don't attend their church servies or allow them to preach in your pulpit as that is sitting under their teachings.


    Preaching and teaching is not worship? Are the songs void of Bibical teaching?





    What do you mean by "the same baptism"???? What baptism are you speaking about?



    So it is not church services you attend, just special singing?
     
  14. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    While I disagree that the structure of the SBC is unbiblical (the SBC is neither a church or a governing authority), I have never been its biggest advocate. So much of its effort seems geared to making itself vital to the operation of the local church. I also hate....no, too strong a word.....abhor....no, still strong....dislike :D Lifeway. I also wonder about the stewardship of maintaining a couple of blocks of downtown Nashville.

    My church is a member of the SBC. We contribute to the cooperative program and agree with the BF&M. Our stronger associstion, however, is the local Baptist association (which includes SBC, Missionary, and Freewill Baptist churches).
     
  15. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    In the New Testament each congregation directly handled their own money through their own chosen representative freely cooperating with other churches who directly handled their own finances apart from any parachurch organization without any president, secretary, etc. No one can claim the position of an apostle nor can any organization. NT churches had DIRECT instead of INDIRECT control over their own finances all the way to the intended recipient.
     
  16. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, I wouldn’t attend their church services as we differ in doctrine. That does not mean that I think they are a “false church”, but it does mean that I believe they have errors in their interpretations of Scripture.

    Paul tells us that everything we do is worship and should glorify our Father. This includes preaching and teaching. What I said was that I have and will worship with these brothers in Christ, excluding sitting under their teachings.
    Baptized into Christ (Galatians 3:27), into His death (Romans 6:1-4). The baptism for which water baptism is a symbol. Paul’s focus is typically not on water baptism itself but the thing baptism represents.
    It is not church services. There is a reason we have separate churches and denominations. As TCassidy pointed out, there is a sense by which doctrine divides. I’m talking about inter-denominational fellowship, not inter-denominational inclusiveness.
     
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Except what Paul collected. :D

    You are making assumptions here, brother. In the New Testament we know that money was collected for purposes beyond itself. We know that counsels met and sat in an authority over individual churches. But we also had apostles at that time and the NT was being written. You are guessing that church corporation in evangelistic efforts as practiced in conventions would be something frowned upon in Scripture.

    Looking to Scripture to authorize such a practice is, BTW, another mark of the CoC (although they are very hypocritical about that one).
     
    #57 JonC, Nov 19, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2016
  18. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I deal with other churches (who teach error yet hold to the gospel of Jesus Christ) on the basis of the gospel and the principle that we are not to judge the servant of Another. It is not up to me to talk the freewill Baptist church into changing their doctrine. It is up to me to guard my church against error. But if the church in question believes the gospel of Jesus Christ, then it is up to me to love them as if that love is directed towards Christ – because it is. (Ever wonder why Jesus asked Saul – “why are you persecuting me?”….I suspect many well meaning Christians will be asked the same).
     
  19. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So since we can't directly hand our money to an apostle our handing our money through our own chosen representative freely cooperating with other churches to a convention is somehow unbiblical. Yea, right. And I'm selling some great beach front property in AZ, if you're interested.

    You are imposing your own traditions and preferences on others here, brother, not Scripture.
     
  20. utilyan

    utilyan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2016
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    293
    So you got born again 1983? Born Again TAKE 2 They are a false religion and no one in there is eternally secure. You say they are unbiblical.

    Cause Pope Bib didn't like his bishop's authority.


    Hey SBC is wrong, TOLD YOU SO. Back then you would have swore right, I'm ready to tell you told you so AGAIN.

    All we got to do is wait till things don't go your way again, in whatever you call it now faith.

    You'll be knifing them back too. Saying no they not biblical, no they not eternally secure, no they not like me. I, I ,I, ME , ME, ME.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...