• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Drinking Wine Wrong??

Status
Not open for further replies.

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
His Blood Spoke My Name said:
Leviticus tells us that the priest is not to partake of fermented wine. I hope your preacher is not partaking of the communion if you use real wine. If he is, he is sinning.
Context. Jesus is our High Priest...and He did drink wine.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The wine and beer manufactured today are NOT the same as in Bible times. The wine in Bible times was .01% and was not fortified--it was boiled down and diluted . Many wines of the ancients were boiled or filtered to prevent fermentation, and these were often considered the best wines. The wine and beer today is "fortified"--much stronger than in Bible times. It took drinking all day long to get drunk in Bible times. Now a person can get drunk from one drink or a can of beer.
Post your resources for this information. This sounds made up to me. The "best" wine, Isaiah 25:6 tells us...is the AGED wine, not the BOILED wine.
Alcohol is the product of decay, the product of fermentation. It is produced by the process of spoiling. You need yeast added to the sugar to make alcohol-- there is a little bit of yeast in the skin of the grape itself, but it isn't enough to produce enough alcohol to make a person drunk--if there was, we would get drunk from eating grapes and raisins. There was no "fortification" in Bible times--therefore, the acohol content was very low--and most of that was "boiled" out and stored in wineskins--and when used, water was added to it.
Your really have no clue what you are talking about. Yeast doesn't make someone drunk...alcohol does!

Your view of wine would negate the Passover. Go back and read Exodus. There was to be NO leaven in homes for seven days. Grape juice has leaven. Wine (alcoholic) does not.
 
webdog said:
Context. Jesus is our High Priest...and He did drink wine.

Context?

The Bible says neither Aaron or his sons were to drink fermented beverages in the tabernacle of the congregation. We are said to be sons in Hebrews. Not just the pastors, but all believers. As sons, we are not to partake of fermented beverages... especially in the communion.

How's that for context.

Don't try to justify sin by twisting the scripture.
 

TaliOrlando

New Member
His Blood Spoke My Name said:
Context?

The Bible says neither Aaron or his sons were to drink fermented beverages in the tabernacle of the congregation. We are said to be sons in Hebrews. Not just the pastors, but all believers. As sons, we are not to partake of fermented beverages... especially in the communion.

How's that for context.

Don't try to justify sin by twisting the scripture.


WOW !! AWESOME!!! :thumbs:
 

mojoala

New Member
Your really have no clue what you are talking about. Yeast doesn't make someone drunk...alcohol does!
Yeast is one of the catalysts that cause the natural sugars to break down and become two things:

Products produced by fermentation are actually waste products produced during the reduction of pyruvate to regenerate NAD+ in the absence of oxygen.
When yeast ferments, it breaks down the glucose (C6H12O6) into exactly two molecules of ethanol (C2H6O) and two molecules of carbon dioxide (CO2).
  • Ethanol fermentation (done by yeast and some types of bacteria) breaks the pyruvate down into ethanol and carbon dioxide. It is important in bread-making, brewing, and wine-making. When the ferment has a high concentration of pectin, minute quantities of methanol can be produced. Usually only one of the products is desired; in bread the alcohol is baked out, and in alcohol production the carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere.
  • Lactic acid fermentation breaks down the pyruvate into lactic acid. It occurs in the muscles of animals when they need energy faster than the blood can supply oxygen. It also occurs in some bacteria and some fungi. It is this type of bacteria that convert lactose into lactic acid in yogurt, giving it its sour taste.
Reaction

The reaction differs according to the sugar being used in the process of anaerobic respiration, below, the sugar will be glucose (C6H12O6) the simplest sugar.
Chemical Equation
C6H12O6 → 2C2H5OH + 2CO2 + 2 ATP (Energy Released:118 kJ mol−1) Word Equation
Sugar (glucose) → Alcohol + Carbon Dioxide + Energy (ATP) [edit]

Zymology

Zymology is the science term for fermentation. It deals with the biochemical processes involved in fermentation, with yeast selection and physiology, and with the practical issues of brewing. Zymology is occasionally known as zymurgy.
[edit]

Simple Definition

Fermentation can be simply defined, in this context, as the conversion of sugar molecules into ethanol and carbon dioxide by yeast.
C6H12O6 => 2CO2 + 2C2H5OH

Now since you have been properly schooled, I believe an apology is in order.
 

mojoala

New Member
The wine and beer manufactured today are NOT the same as in Bible times. The wine in Bible times was .01% and was not fortified--it was boiled down and diluted
Wine was never boiled down and diluted. Boiled down would remove the alcohol content which is needed to preserve it and to kill bacteria and germs. Aged wine was the safest thing to drink.
 

Linda64

New Member
webdog said:
Your view of wine would negate the Passover. Go back and read Exodus. There was to be NO leaven in homes for seven days. Grape juice has leaven. Wine (alcoholic) does not.

I don't know where you got your information, but grape juice does NOT have leaven--and never has had leaven. Wine HAS leaven--yeast has to be ADDED to the already decaying grapes in order to produce alcohol. If grape juice has leaven, then it would be fermented, and grocery stores would not be able to sell it to minors.

I was raised in the Jewish faith--we used "grape juice"--unfermented--(without the leaven) for the children and "fermented" wine (with leaven) for the adults, at our Passover seders.

The "fruit of the vine" is the pure unfermented juice of the grape which Jesus drank at the Last Supper--it represents His precious blood of the New Covenant--undefiled.

For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; (Hebrews 7:26)
 

Ralph III

New Member
No, drinking wine is not a sin. Gluttony and abuse is the sin. Christ made wine and spoke of vineyards as does the Bible throughout.

In addition. The wine could not have been simply grape juice or weak, as the Bible states Noah passed out "drunk".

Gen. 9:20-21 "And Noah began to be a farmer, and he planted a vineyard. Then he drank of the wine and was drunk, and became uncovered in his tent".


Jesus makes wine.
John 2:1-10 "On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2 Now both Jesus and His disciples were invited to the wedding. And when they ran out of wine, the mother of Jesus said to Him, “They have no wine.”
Jesus said to her, “Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me? My hour has not yet come.”
His mother said to the servants, “Whatever He says to you, do it.”
Now there were set there six waterpots of stone, according to the manner of purification of the Jews, containing twenty or thirty gallons apiece. Jesus said to them, “Fill the waterpots with water.” And they filled them up to the brim. And He said to them, “Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast.” And they took it. When the master of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and did not know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom. And he said to him, “Every man at the beginning sets out the good wine, and when the guests have well drunk, then the inferior. You have kept the good wine until now!”


Drinking is not a sin unless you wish to say Christ was a sinner or caused other's to sin. This is clearly an example of when man interjects his belief into scripture or upon others. Such as when some tell people they are going to hell simply for dancing or wearing clothes other than dresses. When the Bible encourages dance and instucts simply to dress modestly.

However, in regards to alcohol or wine.
The Lord may see abstaining from such as being somewhat more righteous. Or more plausibly as some others said, the Lord requires Preachers/elders not to partake of such. In order to be more righteous or maintain such.

I think the later is more accurate as some have offered other scripture supporting that. In addition note the following when the angel tells Zacharias that he and Elizabeth will have a son(John). It is noted "wine" and "strong drink". So apparently they had other drinks even stronger than wine.

Luke 1:13-15 "But the angel said to him, "Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your prayer is heard; and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. For he will be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink.


So drinking is not the sin. Gluttony and abuse is. However, The Lord may see those who do not partake of such as being more righteouse, in that regard. Or abstaining from such is the righteouse manner for Preachers and elders.

Take care. Ralph
 
Last edited by a moderator:

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Linda64 said:
I don't know where you got your information, but grape juice does NOT have leaven--and never has had leaven. Wine HAS leaven--yeast has to be ADDED to the already decaying grapes in order to produce alcohol. If grape juice has leaven, then it would be fermented, and grocery stores would not be able to sell it to minors.

Isn't commercial grape juice pasteurized, though?
 

DeeJay

New Member
Linda64 said:
The wine and beer manufactured today are NOT the same as in Bible times. The wine in Bible times was .01% and was not fortified--it was boiled down and diluted . Many wines of the ancients were boiled or filtered to prevent fermentation, and these were often considered the best wines. The wine and beer today is "fortified"--much stronger than in Bible times. It took drinking all day long to get drunk in Bible times. Now a person can get drunk from one drink or a can of beer.



Alcohol is the product of decay, the product of fermentation. It is produced by the process of spoiling. You need yeast added to the sugar to make alcohol-- there is a little bit of yeast in the skin of the grape itself, but it isn't enough to produce enough alcohol to make a person drunk--if there was, we would get drunk from eating grapes and raisins. There was no "fortification" in Bible times--therefore, the acohol content was very low--and most of that was "boiled" out and stored in wineskins--and when used, water was added to it.

Linda your post is so full of false information I dont even know where to start.

First most wine is not fortified. There are fortified wines like port and some dessert wines but your gereral wine is the same as wine has always been and made much the same way. Wine can not be filtered to stop fermentation and boiling has to be at the temps to produce pasturization and that could not be done until much later in history.

Alcohol is not a product of decay or spoilage. It is the result of emzimes produced by yeast cells, like yogrut and cottage cheese. There is alot of yeast of the skin of a grape and it is more then enough to cause fermentation. Fact is that yeast reproduces at an amazing rate. I will find the numbers but a few yeast cells will be a few hundred thousand in very little time. Or better said A little leaven leavens the whole lump. Besides it is not the yeast that caused intoxication, it is the alcohol that is produced. The amount of yeast is unimportant.

You dont get drunk for eating grapes and rasens because you dont get drunk for eating yeast. Yeast produces alcohol when mixed with suger. The yeast is on the outside of the skin and has not been mixed. When the grape is crushed fermentation startes.

But most of all for grape juice to be free for yeast (leaven) to be used on passover it has to contain enough alcohol to kill the leaven. That is around %14. The jews including Jesus used wine on passover it had to be alcoholic and have enough alcohol to kill yeast.

You should educate yourself on the subject before posting.
 

mactx

New Member
From what I have studied archeologically, the ancient wines and beers were very intoxicating.

More to the point I have done a study of verses (using www.crosswalk.com) and have found NO verse that prohibits using wine, I only did the NT because that is where the Christian is supposed to get their laws from.
Here is what I found, the only verse saying a person would have no wine, was Luke 1:15 and was speaking of John the baptizer, not Jesus.
Then is a prohibition is not to drink in front of those who it would cause to stumble.
The next prohibition of sorts is that deacons and elders (or bishops) are not to be "given to wine" in other words not to be over indulgent with alcohol.
Now looking up the word drunken, THAT is prohibited, several times and is illustrated by bad behavior in parables.
Jesus not only drank wine (and according to the NT is The priest of this age and our example) He made wine, at a wedding after his mother requested it.
I find it interesting that Jesus was proclaimed by the conservative religious leaders of His day as a drunkard and a glutton, and he rebuked them for it. He however was never drunken nor was he a glutton.
Gluttony is warned against in titus 1:2 as something not to be.
So i would have to say since the NT shows us NOT to be drunken and not to be gluttonous, then if drinking is a sin, so is eating. It is adding to what God says to say either one.
Both are matters of self control, which Paul teaches over and over again.
Here are some of his teachings. Ac 24:25, 1Co 7:5 , Ga 5:23 , 2Ti 3:3, 2Pe 1:6 .
Now my crosswalk search words were
drunken, wine, glutton, self control.
The KJV says "slow bellies" in Titus the NIV says lazy glutton, to me they are the same thing
 

DeeJay

New Member
Originally Posted by Linda64
I don't know where you got your information, but grape juice does NOT have leaven--and never has had leaven. Wine HAS leaven--yeast has to be ADDED to the already decaying grapes in order to produce alcohol. If grape juice has leaven, then it would be fermented, and grocery stores would not be able to sell it to minors.

Fresh grape juice that has not been pastorized has leaven. Moderen grape juice has been pastorized to kill leaven. Wine has an alcohol content high enough to kill leaven. When a bottle of wine has lees or sediment of the bottom of the bottle all the yeast has died from the alcohol. You do not have to add yeast to wine. Wild yeast wines are made all the time. I have helped make them. Yeast is added to change the flavor, but the wild yeast has to be killed first because wild yeast on the grape skins is stronger and will take over the added yeast.

Again moderen Welches grape juice sold in stores is pastorized to get rid of yeast. Fresh grape juice is full of leaven.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
webdog said:
Post your resources for this information. This sounds made up to me. The "best" wine, Isaiah 25:6 tells us...is the AGED wine, not the BOILED wine.

Your really have no clue what you are talking about. Yeast doesn't make someone drunk...alcohol does!

Your view of wine would negate the Passover. Go back and read Exodus. There was to be NO leaven in homes for seven days. Grape juice has leaven. Wine (alcoholic) does not.
Yeast is the agent that causes the the juice to become the wine that causes one to become drunk. Without the yeast or fermenting agent juice remains juice.
Yeast is absolutely forbidden in the Bible (in certain cases, not all).
Jesus said: Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees. Beware of the false doctrine of the Phairisees. Yeast represents false doctrine.
In 1Cor.5:6 it symbolizes the spreading of moral corruption.
In Mat.16:6,6,11 it represents the corruptness the pervesenss of the heart.
In general it represents sin.

Christ is our Passover (1Cor.5), and therefore no yeast of leavening agent could be used in his representation. That would include both elements of the Lord's Table.
Priests could not drink fermented wine and if we be priests of God, we ought not to be drinking fermented wine.

Yeast, fermentation, leaven, (all the same) are symbols of corruption. None of them are to be used in symolizing the blood and body of our Jesus Christ. I beleive that that is close to blasphemous.
Jesus created "new wine," not "old wine," He created the best wine--the fruit of the vine, that which was unfermented. It had the best taste because everything that Christ does (creates) is absolutely perfect and without any flaw. It would have been the best possible drink that man could have ever tasted. It came right from the Master's hand. Who could make a drink any better than the Creator Himself?
DHK
 
Let's look at Noah, shall we?

Genesis 9:20-21 20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.

Noah did get drunk on the wine he made, yes.

The result of that drunkenness caused his son to sin and thereby brought a curse to the son.

Lay the axe to the root. Get rid of the root of the problem. When one plants a garden and a weed comes up, one does not just cut a shoot off the weed and let the rest grow. Nor does one cut the root off at the top of the soil and leave the roots to grow. One digs down and removes the weed, root and all. The root in the story of Noah's drunkeness is the wine. Had Noah not drank it, Ham would not have sinned as he did.
Genesis 9:22 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

After this one instance of Noah drinking fermented wine, there is no more mention of him drinking fermented beverage again. This should tell one that fermented beverage is not pleasing in God's sight.
 

mojoala

New Member
After this one instance of Noah drinking fermented wine, there is no more mention of him drinking fermented beverage again.
True but this is also true:

After this one instance of Noah drinking fermented wine, there is no more mention of him NOT drinking fermented beverage either.
 

Linda64

New Member
DeeJay said:
Linda your post is so full of false information I dont even know where to start.

First most wine is not fortified. There are fortified wines like port and some dessert wines but your gereral wine is the same as wine has always been and made much the same way. Wine can not be filtered to stop fermentation and boiling has to be at the temps to produce pasturization and that could not be done until much later in history.

Alcohol is not a product of decay or spoilage. It is the result of emzimes produced by yeast cells, like yogrut and cottage cheese. There is alot of yeast of the skin of a grape and it is more then enough to cause fermentation. Fact is that yeast reproduces at an amazing rate. I will find the numbers but a few yeast cells will be a few hundred thousand in very little time. Or better said A little leaven leavens the whole lump. Besides it is not the yeast that caused intoxication, it is the alcohol that is produced. The amount of yeast is unimportant.

You dont get drunk for eating grapes and rasens because you dont get drunk for eating yeast. Yeast produces alcohol when mixed with suger. The yeast is on the outside of the skin and has not been mixed. When the grape is crushed fermentation startes.

But most of all for grape juice to be free for yeast (leaven) to be used on passover it has to contain enough alcohol to kill the leaven. That is around %14. The jews including Jesus used wine on passover it had to be alcoholic and have enough alcohol to kill yeast.

You should educate yourself on the subject before posting.
Try this site on modern day winemaking--you will see that yeast IS a very necessary catalyst for winemaking--without the yeast, there is NO fermentation, and no fermentation means there is NO alcohol to make one drunk.

If there is an art to winemaking, and there certainly is, then it is the art of controlling yeast. It is the art of selecting the appropriate yeast, introducing it at the correct moment, feeding and nurturing it so as to coax it into living, reproducing and dying in a prescribed manner, and then cleaning up after it so as to preserve the fruit of its labor. It is the art of controlling its temperature, the amount and kind of air it is allowed to breathe, and feeding it the sugar and other nutrients it needs to serve man. For it is not in the nature of yeast to serve man, but rather yeast exists to serve yeast. Controlling yeast is the real art of making wine.

http://winemaking.jackkeller.net/yeast.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gerhard Ebersoehn

Active Member
Site Supporter
There's nothing wrong with wine being drunk; and there's nothing wrong in a person who drinks wine. But there's nothing right in a drunkard. Now the hypocrites won't blame the culpret, so make wine the drunkard's fall.
 

Gerhard Ebersoehn

Active Member
Site Supporter
mojoala said:
True but this is also true:



Yes, ans I can't remember I ever read he ever drank again - water, wine, soup, whatever.

Sometimes I wish people were as observant when they argue about the Sabbath.
 

Gerhard Ebersoehn

Active Member
Site Supporter
DHK said:
Yeast is the agent that causes the the juice to become the wine that causes one to become drunk. Without the yeast or fermenting agent juice remains juice.
Yeast is absolutely forbidden in the Bible (in certain cases, not all).
Jesus said: Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees. Beware of the false doctrine of the Phairisees. Yeast represents false doctrine.
In 1Cor.5:6 it symbolizes the spreading of moral corruption.
In Mat.16:6,6,11 it represents the corruptness the pervesenss of the heart.
In general it represents sin.

Christ is our Passover (1Cor.5), and therefore no yeast of leavening agent could be used in his representation. That would include both elements of the Lord's Table.
Priests could not drink fermented wine and if we be priests of God, we ought not to be drinking fermented wine.

Yeast, fermentation, leaven, (all the same) are symbols of corruption. None of them are to be used in symolizing the blood and body of our Jesus Christ. I beleive that that is close to blasphemous.
Jesus created "new wine," not "old wine," He created the best wine--the fruit of the vine, that which was unfermented. It had the best taste because everything that Christ does (creates) is absolutely perfect and without any flaw. It would have been the best possible drink that man could have ever tasted. It came right from the Master's hand. Who could make a drink any better than the Creator Himself?
DHK

Am I right when I say that fermentation - yeast - also is used in the Scriptures for the good and holy work of the Holy Spirit in both the lives of the individual and the Church?

I cannot just accept the bread and wine of Holy Communion mustn't be fermented. One reason why I believe Jesus used ordinary bread and wine at the Last Supper is that it was not the Passover meal then, but the last usual meal BEFORE Passover - the last of fermente bread and wine. (Bedikat hamets)
 

mojoala

New Member
This reminds me of somthing:

THREE RELIGIOUS TRUTHS

1. Jews do not recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

2. Protestants do not recognize the pope as the leader of the Christian faith.

3.
Baptists do not recognize each other in the liquor store.


:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top