Reply to 12 strings
Hi 12 Strings, God sets the bar and invites us to meet that standard. Then He credits those that actually meet the standard in His eyes. So His choice is based on His evaluation, and His criteria, but it is guided by His promise of eternal life to those who believe from the heart.
Lets say a person goes all in for Christ, holding nothing back, and committing to follow Christ no matter the cost from that point forward. Did he save himself? Nope, he is not saved. How did he get saved? By automatically entering the body of Christ? Nope. God puts those He chooses into the body of Christ, saving them based on crediting their faith as righteousness. So salvation does not depend upon the man that wills, his faith is worthless, a filthy rag. But God sovereignly credits his faith as righteousness and places them in Christ. Can he boast he saved himself? Nope. Can he boast in the merit of his faith? Nope.
Calvinism is simply unbiblical, turning our trust in Christ as an impossibility, yet the two soils of Matthew 13 did trust in Christ to some degree. One poster claimed the second and third soils were saved because they sprang up. But eternal life is not "temporary." Next we have someone who claims a person can have no fruit yet be saved. Certainly no visible fruit to others is possible, but no fruit in the eyes of God? No chance. It is impossible to bear fruit without being saved, indwelt, in Christ and Christ in us. Therefore, an unfruitful person, in God's eyes would be an unsaved person, one that does not "abide in Christ." John 15.
So to clarify, which of these is closer to what you are saying:
1. Many people have faith in God, but God decides which of those to credit their faith as righteousness based purely on his own free choice?
or...
2. Many have faith in God, but God decides which to credit as righteousness based on the level, or the sold-outness of their faith? (if you pick this one, how is not still based on "the man who wills?")
Hi 12 Strings, God sets the bar and invites us to meet that standard. Then He credits those that actually meet the standard in His eyes. So His choice is based on His evaluation, and His criteria, but it is guided by His promise of eternal life to those who believe from the heart.
Lets say a person goes all in for Christ, holding nothing back, and committing to follow Christ no matter the cost from that point forward. Did he save himself? Nope, he is not saved. How did he get saved? By automatically entering the body of Christ? Nope. God puts those He chooses into the body of Christ, saving them based on crediting their faith as righteousness. So salvation does not depend upon the man that wills, his faith is worthless, a filthy rag. But God sovereignly credits his faith as righteousness and places them in Christ. Can he boast he saved himself? Nope. Can he boast in the merit of his faith? Nope.
Calvinism is simply unbiblical, turning our trust in Christ as an impossibility, yet the two soils of Matthew 13 did trust in Christ to some degree. One poster claimed the second and third soils were saved because they sprang up. But eternal life is not "temporary." Next we have someone who claims a person can have no fruit yet be saved. Certainly no visible fruit to others is possible, but no fruit in the eyes of God? No chance. It is impossible to bear fruit without being saved, indwelt, in Christ and Christ in us. Therefore, an unfruitful person, in God's eyes would be an unsaved person, one that does not "abide in Christ." John 15.