I seem to get what James is saying...you are the one ripping it to pieces. Like I said, a child can understand the progression.WD....
if a child can understand it....why have you missed it.
I'm well aware of man's fallen condition. This is not the same thing as Augustinianism.Your Post as stands refutes nothing..but in fact denies most of the Nt teaching on mans fallen condition.
DittoI think you are sincere..but sincerely mistaken.
It explains what a sinner is and the consequence. Only someone so entrenched in Augustinianism could miss it.This is a great passage to explain the anatomy of sin...and where it leads to.
It's your perogative if you want to embrace Roman Catholic hamartiology...I'll pass.Your mis-use of it does not negate how most of the believing church has understood these passages and the truth they do teach.
What have I made up? I quoted Scripture word for word! If anything Augustine invented an extra-biblical doctrine you embrace.You do need to come to a correct understanding of both passages or...you can just make up your own webdogisms.