• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJV's Textual Error

Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
George Antonios said:
Yet again, parroted mantras:



That's basically German for "resurrection".

Easter | Origin, History, Name, Facts, & Dates

Is the Name “Easter” of Pagan Origin?



Gabriel calls the Son of God a thing:
Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

Want to correct angelic prince Gabriel maybe? Tell him how your scholarly opinion trumps his, or how you're more royal than the King and won't have him call his Spirit it sometimes.



That's because he is both...
Click to expand...
Kjv makes it that Peter and Paul was citing the Father as the great God and Jesus the Savior, not that Jesus was both!
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
robycop3 said:
That's why modern Bible translations are made with an eclectic mix of manuscripts. After all, there are more than 5K mss. available, and we cannot judge one over the other as GOD preserved them all. And the KJV was made with only 20 or so mss.
Click to expand...
Think many would be surprised on just how much in agreement the CT/MT/TR texts are to each other!
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
robycop3 said:
The NKJV accurately reads 'passover' in Acts 12:4 where the KJV incorrectly reads 'Easter'. The NKJV accurately reads "the love of money is A root of ALL SORTS of evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10 while the KJV incorrectly reads "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in that verse. The NKJV correctly reads "You shall not MURDER" in Ex. 20:13 while the KJV incorrectly reads "thou shalt not KILL" in that verse.
Click to expand...
IF one holds to the superority of the TR text, then the Nkjv superior to the Kjv to use!
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Stratton7 said:
Why must you turn everything into a KJO topic?
The thread is about a supposed error in the KJB (which I disagree that it is). Not about what the KJO accepts.
Click to expand...
was just answering the question posed back to prove that the NKJV is better then the Kjv!
 
M

MB

Well-Known Member
robycop3 said:
The NKJV accurately reads 'passover' in Acts 12:4 where the KJV incorrectly reads 'Easter'. The NKJV accurately reads "the love of money is A root of ALL SORTS of evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10 while the KJV incorrectly reads "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in that verse. The NKJV correctly reads "You shall not MURDER" in Ex. 20:13 while the KJV incorrectly reads "thou shalt not KILL" in that verse.
Click to expand...
Yes but the thought is the same just worded differently. The reason the NKJV is not a revised version of the KJV, they are unaffiliated.The thought that the New King James version is in fact a new version of the KJV is false. They just wanted to sell Bibles so they stole the name. misleading people in to thinking that it is the New King James. In my opinion they are completely different.
MB
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
MB said:
Yes but the thought is the same just worded differently. The reason the NKJV is not a revised version of the KJV, they are unaffiliated.The thought that the New King James version is in fact a new version of the KJV is false. They just wanted to sell Bibles so they stole the name. misleading people in to thinking that it is the New King James. In my opinion they are completely different.
MB
MB
Click to expand...
Nkjv uses same textual sources, just updated grammar and corrected some Kjv mistakes!
 
SavedByGrace

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
MB said:
Yes but the thought is the same just worded differently. The reason the NKJV is not a revised version of the KJV, they are unaffiliated.The thought that the New King James version is in fact a new version of the KJV is false. They just wanted to sell Bibles so they stole the name. misleading people in to thinking that it is the New King James. In my opinion they are completely different.
MB
Click to expand...

What is the New King James Version (NKJV) Bible?
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
SavedByGrace said:
This is 2 Peter 1:1, "of our God and Savior Jesus Christ"

Titus 2:13, "our great God and Savior Jesus Christ"

I see "Great" in Titus, but not 2 Peter.
Click to expand...
Both places though, the MV correctly translate it as meaning Jesus is both God and savior, while Kjv makes it seem God the Father is God, while Jesus is Savior!
 
SavedByGrace

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
Yeshua1 said:
Both places though, the MV correctly translate it as meaning Jesus is both God and savior, while Kjv makes it seem God the Father is God, while Jesus is Savior!
Click to expand...

You are not getting what I am saying. You said earlier that in both places, it reads "Great God and Saviour", but this is not true for 2 Peter 1:1.
 
Stratton7

Stratton7

Member
SavedByGrace said:
You just don't like facts! It is nothing to do with "hating" the KJV, but, as this is the only Version that has a following that are deluded into thinking, KJVO, like no other ever counts,
Click to expand...
I realize you were speaking to someone else in this quote, but I just tried yesterday to help keep your thread from turning into in a KJO vs MV by showing that the topic was about a supposed KJB error.
You’ve made it obvious though here the intent behind your post.
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Stratton7 said:
:rolleyes: That it’s more about attacking those who hold to the KJB than just reviewing a supposed textual error in it.
I don’t mean to rude but that should have been obvious given what I quoted from you.
Click to expand...
Kjvo have think skins, as they blast off on the "corrupted" MV, and yet when all we do is point out that the Kjv as mistakes in it, that the TR is not perfect, seen as "attacking and putting down: the Kjv!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top