Yes, but some believers do not treat Him as Lord!
And there is an entire group of TV preachers, and their followers, who make Him their fetch-it-man! You know, the Word of Faith people!
Like He's the Genie Lord Jesus.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, but some believers do not treat Him as Lord!
And there is an entire group of TV preachers, and their followers, who make Him their fetch-it-man! You know, the Word of Faith people!
Will someone tell this guy he has no idea what the bottom line actually is!
he must be busy answering the 4 questions and working through the article...the 9 points O.R. asked him to work through.
I stopped taking him serious a long time ago. Aside from the intentional misspelling he avoids dealing with scripture people use to support their position he opposes.
Yep. DHK is right. Again!:thumbs:The issue in LS boils down to works vs. grace.
Is salvation by grace through faith (a one time event)? or,
Is salvation by grace through faith + all the commands of discipleship added in at the same time--which makes it a works salvation.
Which one? You can't have both.
Yep. DHK is right. Again!:thumbs:
I think this is the problem, you think discipleship and conversion unto salvation are distinct. The conversation that Jesus has w/ the rich young ruler and subsequently w/ the disciples makes it apparent that Jesus equated salvation and eternal life with following him or discipleship (Mark 10:17-31).This is true! LS simply sneaks ultimate justifcation by works through a back door labeled as grace. Where there is no works there is no salvation according to LS.
The proof texts used by LS confuse discipleship with salvation or confuse the state of the internal man with the state of the external life of the man.
The true difference between saved and lost is not sin. It is their attitude toward sin and the fact they cannot escape chastening consequences of sin. In addition they persevere in saving faith (1 Jn. 2:19). Other than that, we find complete extreme lives side by side of saved person as Abraham compared to Lot.
If you are a LS person, please point out VISIBLE EXTERNAL characteristic righteousness in the life of Lot?? Peter says he was saved but based it upon UNSEEN characteristic righteousness - HIS HEART was vexed.
The issue in LS boils down to works vs. grace.
Is salvation by grace through faith (a one time event)? or,
Is salvation by grace through faith + all the commands of discipleship added in at the same time--which makes it a works salvation.
Which one? You can't have both.
Yep. DHK is right. Again!:thumbs:
This is true!....
Here are the possible conclusions of your post:No, it’s not true, DHK is wrong. The only part of our salvation this side of eternity that is a ‘one time event’ is regeneration. That occurs only once. Our gospel salvation is an ongoing affair for the entirety of our stay in this realm of time. We absolutely must hold fast and continue in the faith in order to reap the bennies of the kingdom:
Take heed to thyself, and to thy teaching. Continue in these things; for in doing this thou shalt save both thyself and them that hear thee. 1 Tim 4:16
for the word of the cross to those indeed perishing is foolishness, and to us -- those being saved -- it is the power of God, 1 Cor 1:18 YLT
So then, my beloved, even as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; for it is God who worketh in you both to will and to work, for his good pleasure. Phil 2:12,13
......to present you holy and without blemish and unreproveable before him: if so be that ye continue in the faith, grounded and stedfast, and not moved away from the hope of the gospel which ye heard, Col 1:22,23
Behold then the goodness and severity of God: toward them that fell, severity; but toward thee, God`s goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. Ro 11:22
Now I make known unto you brethren, the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye received, wherein also ye stand, by which also ye are saved, if ye hold fast the word which I preached unto you, except ye believed in vain. 1 Cor 15:1,2
but Christ as a son, over his house; whose house are we, if we hold fast our boldness and the glorying of our hope firm unto the end...... for we are become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our confidence firm unto the end: Heb 3:6,14
One area that LS is dead wrong is the supposition that His children will always not only persevere but grow. They won’t hear of the possibility that the redeemed can make shipwreck of their faith. Also, the BOLD sin has always been a real danger for His children to fall into:
Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; Let them not have dominion over me... Ps 19:13
For ye, brethren, were called for freedom; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh, but through love be servants one to another. Gal 5:13
as free, and not using your freedom for a cloak of wickedness, but as bondservants of God. 1 Pet 2:16
Yep. DHK is right. Again!:thumbs:
ky red the judges have ruled post 109 the winner and everyone should be in agreement with what you posted
Hold on there Icon, don't be hasty!:smilewinkgrin:
:laugh::wavey:yes could be they just got very excited at the very fine versus Kyred offered
Can someone tell me where I missed the post that the OP seems to have alluded to in the title? I never once saw the OP defend LS.
He didn't and I doubt he will. His defense always end up being read this book by this author so no actual defense of anything. I noticed in another thread he said he could debate the topic without books but he has not returned to answer anyones objections to his point.
Whether evan can defend his OP or not there is nothing in the link posted by Icon and me where MacArthur describes his view of Lordship Salvation that can be called "Works Salvation". At least no one has accepted the challenge to do so!
Whether evan can defend his OP or not there is nothing in the link posted by Icon and me where MacArthur describes his view of Lordship Salvation that can be called "Works Salvation". At least no one has accepted the challenge to do so!
But when someone starts a thread claiming it is a defense of LS, they should be able to do so. And I never voiced any opinion, only challenging the OP to actually defend his stance, not point people to books.