or must we have full obedience for a certail lenght of time to merit salvation from God?
This has nothing to do with LS.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
or must we have full obedience for a certail lenght of time to merit salvation from God?
I agree with this post completely, DHK, in its entirety, but I wanted to focus on this first link you provided, and quote a piece from early on in the article:I don't think so. In fact you only have to do a simple search to find dozens of links like this:
http://expreacherman.com/2011/03/24/...nd-repentance/
I believe that one brief paragraph captures the error of both Lordship and Calvinist adherent on this board. All that need be added to that is the fact of their total rejection of progressive sanctification. Thanks for sharing.Washer started the video by saying: (In Bold Red)
It is impossible to be embraced [???] by the Gospel of Jesus Christ and not to be changed at the very core of your being and it not be manifest to those around you.
He starts out with an un-Scriptural statement. He apparently either ignores or does not understand the two natures (old and new) of the believer and the free will we have to be obedient to the Lord or not. A believer will not necessarily automatically “manifest” that he has been “changed at the very core of his being.”
I agree. In that statement it demonstrates why the doctrine negates not only progressive sanctification, but also the denial of "a carnal Christian" which is so clearly taught in 1Cor.3:1-4.I agree with this post completely, DHK, in its entirety, but I wanted to focus on this first link you provided, and quote a piece from early on in the article:I believe that one brief paragraph captures the error of both Lordship and Calvinist adherent on this board. All that need be added to that is the fact of their total rejection of progressive sanctification. Thanks for sharing.
I agree with this post completely, DHK, in its entirety, but I wanted to focus on this first link you provided, and quote a piece from early on in the article:I believe that one brief paragraph captures the error of both Lordship and Calvinist adherent on this board. All that need be added to that is the fact of their total rejection of progressive sanctification. Thanks for sharing.
This is a red herring.
Let's look at the differences:
1. We don't live in an "age of miracles," that is, the spiritual gifts have ceased.
2. Jesus is not here in the flesh performing miracles in front of us, miracles in which he did to demonstrate his deity that not even the apostles could replicate. (Thus they followed him for his miracles).
3. No one is following you or me for the miracles that we perform.
4. It is speaking of Jesus, in the flesh, who could read the hearts of men, something we cannot do. This is one of the faults of LS along with Calvinism, an assumption that they can read the hearts of men--only God has this ability.
Jesus is delineating between the saved and the unsaved. It has nothing to do with LS.
I don't think so. In fact you only have to do a simple search to find dozens of links like this:
http://expreacherman.com/2011/03/24/...nd-repentance/
http://expreacherman.com/2012/08/08/...-of-salvation/
Why is it called "Lordship" salvation?
Because if Jesus is Lord, then you are his "disciple," and all the verses on discipleship apply to you immediately upon trusting Christ as Savior. Therefore you are a mature Christian ready "to forsake all" at the moment of justification. Nonsense. But that is what these guys teach.
And in his last statement he says "he demands each one of you to repent of your sins and believe the gospel."
That is not biblical; it is a works gospel.
No man can repent of his sins. No person can even remember all of his sins much less repent of them. Nowhere in the NT does the Bible command the unbeliever to repent of their sins in order to be saved. That is a false gospel. It is heresy. It is a works salvation. The gospel is by grace through faith; not of works--repentance of sins.
--He has a wrong view of repentance.
Would say that LS teaching would seem to be more prevalent among reformed calvinists, not Baptist ones!
As many of us who are Baptists and holding to DoG as i do, would still see progressive growth/maturity, and carnal christianity going on!
That's not what he said. You can be a disciple, and be locked in a prison of sin of your own making: Addiction, adultery, gossiping, compulsive lying, disordered gambling. Doesn't mean you are not saved, as some on here would have you believe. It means you have not learned to surrender yourself completely to Christ. This is progressive sanctification.So someone can be a Christian, but not be a disciple?
That's not what he said. You can be a disciple, and be locked in a prison of sin of your own making: Addiction, adultery, gossiping, compulsive lying, disordered gambling. Doesn't mean you are not saved, as some on here would have you believe. It means you have not learned to surrender yourself completely to Christ. This is progressive sanctification.
Another helpful post as you have answered well on every point. The idea of repentance not being needed is a fleshly idea....Or they suggest it is optional.I looked at your links. This man is even more off base than you. He is attacking what he clearly doesn't understand. And I see now why you are having such a hard time with this, because you are getting bad information from bad secondary sources like this guys blog. If you actually want to learn what LS teaches, then listen to Washer or MacArthur yourself, not sound bite snippets from random blogs.
Again, simply wrong.
Repentance is essential and is throughout the Bible, not just the NT. No repentance=no salvation. This idea that you seem to have that one can believe in Christ, never repent and live like the world their entire life and still be a Christian is simply a myth. Salvation really changes you. The gospel actually transforms people. It is supernatural and infallible, if you are saved you will be changed.
That's not what he said. You can be a disciple, and be locked in a prison of sin of your own making: Addiction, adultery, gossiping, compulsive lying, disordered gambling. Doesn't mean you are not saved, as some on here would have you believe. It means you have not learned to surrender yourself completely to Christ. This is progressive sanctification.
Another helpful post as you have answered well on every point. The idea of repentance not being needed is a fleshly idea....Or they suggest it is optional.
There is man's idea of repentance, including Washer's,RLBosley
Another helpful post as you have answered well on every point. The idea of repentance not being needed is a fleshly idea....Or they suggest it is optional.
I think I am beginning to regret asking my question publicly, though it was educational. I did not intend to start another argument.
I simply was looking for a simple, plain definition of Lordship Salvation. Thanks to everyone (well most everyone :laugh for the help.
I feels ya, mah man. Lol. Some a dis dudes cain't read. They's all ready ta bicker' n batter' n a New Yoik minute then talk about Christian brotherly love from da other side a da mouth.
:BangHead:
.There is man's idea of repentance, including Washer's,
and then there is Biblical repentance
.Man's idea or repentance (including Washer) leads to a works salvation and is not taught in the Bible
I challenge you to find any Scriptural support for it.
In his invitation he said:
"Repent of your sins, and believe... and you shall be saved."
That is not true nor biblical.
DHK....I am having a hard time understanding some of your ideas.Some go even farther than that and say, "Repent of all your sins..."
Be honest Icon. I don't know at what age you were saved (I was saved at the age of 20). From that day and every single day before that day, could you have possibly remember every single sin in your life that you had every committed, enumerated all of them before the Lord, that is confess them all, so that one by one you would be able to repent of each one of them?
It is an impossible act, and one that God does not require of any person. It is works.
That is what is meant to "Repent of ALL your sins," or simply to "Repent of your sins." You can't do it. It is a works based salvation.
30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:Nowhere in the Bible does God command an unregenerate/unsaved person to repent of their sins.
Agreed it is a change of mind. but also a turning to God.Repentance is a change of mind with respect to one's attitude to God.
As an unsaved man I was in rebellion to God. I heard the Gospel. I trusted Christ as Saviour and Lord. That was not only an act of faith, it was an act of repentance. They are two sides of the same coin. One doesn't happen without the other.
In putting my faith in Christ I had a change of mind. I repented.
Christ is now my Lord. My attitude has changed from one of rebellion to one of submission to Jesus Christ. That is what repentance is. It cannot come without faith. It is a change of mind with respect to one's attitude toward God. Once I was in rebellion to God; now I am in submission to his authority.
I've got a question for Iconoclast;
Iconoclast, if you have repented of all known sins, do you ALWAYS drive at or below the posted speed limit? If not, then you have not repented of your sins according to your view. We are commanded to obey those in authority.
Heb 13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.
Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
Now, I don't know of anybody who perfectly obeys the speed limits, because sometimes the speed limits are unreasonable, almost un-do-able at times. Nevertheless, as Christians we are commanded to obey the authorities, there are no loopholes.
If you can honestly say you keep the posted speed limits at all times you can claim you have repented of sin (at least this one kind of sin). If you cannot honestly say you keep the posted speed limit at all times, then you have not repented of your sins (in your view).
We do repent of all known sins[in the past] and we are not to sin now....if I am a lawbreaker...I am subject to the laws penalty...a ticket, which I have been awarded upon occasion.......A Christian is to obey lawful human government.
A ticket?
Rom 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
A ticket is the least of your worries if your view is correct.
The ticket is only when you got caught.Can you understand any verse on any topic.....I paid the ticket Winman,,,I submitted to the lawful authority. The fact that you look for absurdities shows your mindset...