• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

New climate study deals blow to skeptics

poncho

Well-Known Member
Jefferson would be too busy cutting up Bibles, taking out references to the divinity of Christ, the virgin birth, the miracles and the resurrection. After all, there are numerous translations nowadays, not just the KJV that he could butcher to fit his un-Christian belief system.

No doubt Jefferson would be on your ignore list. I wonder who your earthly hero is InTheDark . . . Ben Bernanke? Amscel Mayer Rothschild? I know it's gotta be some crook bent on defrauding the United States with some form of usury. They seem to be the ones you defend the most adamantly. :smilewinkgrin:

Oh wait, you can't read this because I like Jefferson am on your ignore list. :cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

quantumfaith

Active Member
I'm no tree-hugger by any stretch, but I agree wholeheartedly with this.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

I agree ARBO, some here seem to be getting their knickers in knot for no reason, except that they like to throw around the "lib" label.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

I agree ARBO, some here seem to be getting their knickers in knot for no reason, except that they like to throw around the "lib" label.

To me it is a simple thing. It doesn't matter whether you are a con or a lib.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
I got no problem with conserving the earth and all but let's do it based on real facts and scientific study instead of fake reports and fear mongering propaganda.
 

Havensdad

New Member
Uh...in Genesis?

Give the scripture...

I am asking you, because this "Good stewardship" of the trees and cattle thing is much like the "God helps those who help themselves" verse...everyone seems to think its there, but its not....
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Give the scripture...

I am asking you, because this "Good stewardship" of the trees and cattle thing is much like the "God helps those who help themselves" verse...everyone seems to think its there, but its not....

Gen 1:26-30.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Havensdad

New Member
Gen 1:26-30.

Nothing in their about protecting the earth.

We are to SUBDUE (Kabash) the earth (literally to "tread down" or to conquer. It is a very negative word, that is used in several places in the Old Testament to denote annihilating an opposing army).

We are also to have dominion over the earth (radah). This also means to tread down, and is also a very negative term. For instance, Israelites are not to "radah" there brethren... "

Again, nothing in the scriptures about protecting trees, animals, and the environment. These things are all looked on as property of man that he is free to use however he desires.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Nothing in their about protecting the earth.

We are to SUBDUE (Kabash) the earth (literally to "tread down" or to conquer. It is a very negative word, that is used in several places in the Old Testament to denote annihilating an opposing army).

We are also to have dominion over the earth (radah). This also means to tread down, and is also a very negative term. For instance, Israelites are not to "radah" there brethren... "

Again, nothing in the scriptures about protecting trees, animals, and the environment. These things are all looked on as property of man that he is free to use however he desires.

But we can still be rational about it. One generation hasn't the right to deprive the next of say clean air and water for example.
 

Havensdad

New Member
But we can still be rational about it. One generation hasn't the right to deprive the next of say clean air and water for example.

I have no problem with reasonable protections of the environment. I just don't like people trying to invent Bible verses to support it.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Nothing in their about protecting the earth.

We are to SUBDUE (Kabash) the earth (literally to "tread down" or to conquer. It is a very negative word, that is used in several places in the Old Testament to denote annihilating an opposing army).

We are also to have dominion over the earth (radah). This also means to tread down, and is also a very negative term. For instance, Israelites are not to "radah" there brethren... "

Again, nothing in the scriptures about protecting trees, animals, and the environment. These things are all looked on as property of man that he is free to use however he desires.

As I understand the concept of being granted dominion over creation, as in vs. 26, there is a responsibility for its proper use.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
I reject the premise that rejection of propoganda means I want to destroy the earth. It is a liberal trick. The same argument they use that if we aren't pro-choice, we want pregnant teenagers to die in alleyways. It's ridiculous.

And the idea that conservatives banned DDT is a lie. If that was the case, the liberals would be on record demanding it be used to save the lives of the poor they claim to care about. They aren't, and they won't be. I believe that allows me to speculate on why.

And lastly, I believe Paul doesn't seem to sure about his salvation. He should worry more about eternity, than temporal things. I got that advice out of the same book he's trying to beat us with.
 
Top