• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Part 3, Earth Millions of Years Old?

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
...
Why doesn't the 24 hour day of Genesis make sense?

I've already mentioned some, which nobody here seemed able to debate.

1. The Night Sky is dark (if you don't live to close to a city) That is because there is nothing much from 50,000 to 200,000 years ago to light up part of the sky. Nor is there any light coming from before the Big Bang (some 8 Billion to 15 Billion years ago.)

...
Do you doubt the power of GOD? Sounds as if you do.:tear::tear:
Jumping to conclusions again, eh ^^^^^^^^^^^^:tear::tear:

I do not doubt the ability of God to start the big bang and have everything go His way from then on. Obviously others do not have that much trust in the Ability of God FORCING GOD to kowtow to a 24-hour day for creating things. The whole idea of Genesis chapter 1 is one that shows God not only created everything of importance but also the 7th day of rest. I suppose you will take a break at sundown and rest the next 24-hour-day not make God's phosphors do all the work (not to mention human pushing of keys).
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by OldRegular
...
Why doesn't the 24 hour day of Genesis make sense?
Response by Ed Ed
I've already mentioned some, which nobody here seemed able to debate.

Actually there was no substance to debate.

Response by Ed Ed
1. The Night Sky is dark (if you don't live to close to a city) That is because there is nothing much from 50,000 to 200,000 years ago to light up part of the sky. Nor is there any light coming from before the Big Bang (some 8 Billion to 15 Billion years ago.)

The night sky is dark, except for the stars and or moon, because the earth is in the process of its 24 hour rotation. By the way Ed Ed if you would read a little more you would learn that the Big Bang is losing favor with many astro physicists. A concept which is gaining some adherents, is the spontaneous creation of the universe from nothing but the mathematics of quantum physics and relativity theory [page 206, Vol. 2 and page 16, Vol. 3 of The Modern Creation Trilogy by Henry M. and John D. Morris] How does that grab you Ed?

Originally Posted by OldRegular
...
Do you doubt the power of GOD? Sounds as if you do.
Response by Ed Ed
Jumping to conclusions again, eh ^^^^^^^^^^^^

No! When someone places the atheistic concept of evolution above the Word of GOD then I draw relevant conclusions. That is the scientific method you know, observe and draw conclusions.

Response by Ed Ed
I do not doubt the ability of God to start the big bang and have everything go His way from then on. Obviously others do not have that much trust in the Ability of God FORCING GOD to kowtow to a 24-hour day for creating things. The whole idea of Genesis chapter 1 is one that shows God not only created everything of importance but also the 7th day of rest. I suppose you will take a break at sundown and rest the next 24-hour-day not make God's phosphors do all the work (not to mention human pushing of keys).

Your first statement in the above paragraph borders on deism.

As for the 24 hour day I simply trust that GOD does not play games with those HE created in HIS image, man. You on the other hand have bowed to the pagan god of evolution.

A question: How long is the seventh day?
_________
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not doubt the ability of God to start the big bang and have everything go His way from then on. Obviously others do not have that much trust in the Ability of God

I do not think that's true. I do believe those of us who believe in a young earth creation believe that God could have made the world however He wanted to. He could have spit, He could have spoken, He could have had a big bang, He could have had a little bang - whatever He wanted to do, He could do. However, God has told us just exactly how He did it - in Genesis.

FORCING GOD to kowtow to a 24-hour day for creating things.

As I said, God told us that's how He did it. It's not our place to force God to do anything. We're just passing on the information straight from God's breath.

The whole idea of Genesis chapter 1 is one that shows God not only created everything of importance but also the 7th day of rest. I suppose you will take a break at sundown and rest the next 24-hour-day not make God's phosphors do all the work (not to mention human pushing of keys).

Actually, the seventh day isn't even in Genesis 1. It's in the beginning of chapter 2. Oh and remember that the Sabbath was created for man - not man for the Sabbath. It is a blessing for us - a day when we can renew ourselves - spend time with family - spend time with Him. It doesn't mean, as many have thought in the past, that we are to not do anything at all on our day of rest. Jesus told us so.
 

Jarthur001

Active Member
Give me a Bible reason for obeying your command.
I work for a Jewish Carpenter & I'm on the clock.

Good dodge. :) :) :)

I was only wanting you to share your faith. You are not willing. I understand why.

I'll take that you have no reason for it in science or you would say so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by OldRegular
2. The basis of science is that it makes sense??
Response by Ed Ed
Nope, the basis of science is that GOD MAKES SENSE. Contrast with random events, what if you did the same thing over and over and different things happened every time - there would be no laws of anything. Yet the Universe God created shows that God makes sense.

You totally misunderstood: the LOGIC of science is that God exists and you can study some of the attribulates of God by studying (according to some priciples of science) His creation. So if you find someone who says they are a 'scientist' and that 'God is Dead' - they are being very illogical.

Ed Ed, your original post was misleading.


Originally Posted by Ed Edwards
IMHO God always makes sense (the very basis of Science, BTW). The 24 hour day in Genesis One really doesn't make sense EXCEPT as a metaphor.

It appears that you are saying two things, God makes sense and science makes sense. Perhaps that was not your intent but we will never know will we. By the way you failed to respond to my comments related to your statement that GOD makes sense. I trust that you will not disappoint me or Jarthur001 in the question he posed.

Now explain for all "usens" on this forum who are unlearned why a 24 hour day in Genesis 1 doesn't make sense.

Originally Posted by OldRegular
a. At one time science said the earth was flat.

Response by Ed Edwards
That was to jive with the mistaken idea that the 'day' in Genesis is limited to '24-hour days'. As you well note, that was wrong to do.

Ed ED, that answer is beyond credibility. The concept of a flat earth had nothing to do with limiting the Genesis day to 24 hours. You are grasping at straws.

Originally Posted by OldRegular
b. At one time science said there were four elements:
earth, air, fire, and water.

Response by Ed Edwards
1. That was to jive with the mistaken idea that the 'day' in Genesis is limited to '24-hour days'. As you well imply, that was wrong to do.

Ed ED, that answer is beyond credibility. How in the world can you draw a connection between the four elements above and limiting the Genesis day to 24 hours. The Greeks were the ones who stated there were earth, air, fire, and water. They had no knowledge of Genesis. You are grasping at straws and going down for the third time.

Response by Ed Edwards
2. Science still says there are 'four states of matter': solid, gas, energy, and liquid. Notice the same four in kind, but a new description of what the four things are.

Ed Ed, I believe you are a little behind. First energy is not a state of matter. It is true that the 1st Law of Thermodynamics states that the matter/energy of the universe is constant but that does not mean energy is a state of matter. Actually there are currently considered to be five [5] states of matter: solids, liquids, gases, plasmas, and Bose Einstein.

"Plasma is an ionized gas, a gas into which sufficient energy is provided to free electrons from atoms or molecules and to allow both species, ions and electrons, to coexist. In effect a plasma is a cloud of protons, neutrons and electrons where all the electrons have come loose from their respective molecules and atoms, giving the plasma the ability to act as a whole rather than as a bunch of atoms. Plasmas are the most common state of matter in the universe comprising more than 99% of our visible universe and most of that not visible."

"The collapse of the atoms into a single quantum state is known as Bose condensation or Bose-Einstein condensation is now considered a 5th state of matter.

Recently, scientists have discovered the Bose-Einstein condensate, which can be thought of as the opposite of a plasma. It occurs at ultra-low temperature, close to the point that the atoms are not moving at all. A Bose-Einstein condensate is a gaseous superfluid phase formed by atoms cooled to temperatures very near to absolute zero."

http://www.edinformatics.com/math_science/states_of_matter.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldRegular
c. At one time doctors used leeches as a treatment for various and sundry illnesses.

Response by Ed Edwards
Actually, they still do. Leeches have a natural (i.e. God-made-it) chemical that reduces the clotting of human blood (and animals with similar blood). From those chemicals, other chemicals now exist to help people recover from heart attacks. Ed notes that many heart attacks come from lack of self-control at the table*

There is one drawback. Leeches can harbor dangerous bacteria which can be transmitted to the patient and cause infection. So doctors at the University of Wisconsin are developing a synthetic leech in the shape of a small glass and metal vial with fluid running through it, which mimics the leech's ability to irrigate the wound and increase circulation with a constant supply of fresh oxygenated blood while damaged veins regrow.

http://www.soundmedicine.iu.edu/archive/2002/mystery/leeches.html

Response by Ed Edwards
* note Here the 'table' is a figure of Speech (not a metaphor but a _____ (title)for all things involved in eating & drinking; i.e. where 'table' stands in for all the things necessary for food from initial planting to the time one stuffs it into their face)

Table might be a simile depending on how it is used. Simile: A figure of speech in which two unlikely things are explicitely compared, as in “she is like a rose.” I would not want to say "she is like a table" but some would.

Actually I believe table could be hyperbole: [1] Obvious and intentional exaggeration. [2] An extravagent statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.” Something like "sleeping on that bed was like sleeping on a table".

Then of course there is allegory: The representation of an abstract or spiritual meaning through concrete or material forms. I know, the Lords table. Got it.

Next there is Parable: A short allegorical story designed to convey some truth, religious principle, or moral lesson. Perhaps you were using table in parabolic form Ed Ed. That is "don't be a glutton". Very Good.

Now for metaphor: The application of a word or phrase to an object or concept which it does not literally denote, in order to suggest comparison with another object or concept, as in “a mighty fortress is our God.”

I suppose a lap might be considered a table also! Would that be a metaphor Ed?

Originally Posted by OldRegular
d. enough said!
Response by Ed Edwards
You didn't say a thing that was of merit.
Try again. They say 'practice makes perfect'

Read and learn Ed. Read and learn.

Again you failed to respond to my comments related to your statement that GOD makes sense. I trust that you will not disappoint me or Jarthur001 in the question he posed.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Ed Edwards // I do not doubt the ability of God to start the big bang and have everything go His way from then on. //

Note this is NOT the same thing as saying:

Following statement is a FALSE example.
I beleive God started the big bang, and everything has gone His way since.
Preceeding statement is a FALSE example.

I beleve that God COULD start the big bang and have everything go His way from then on -- not that He did.

Figures of Speech
by E.W. Bullinger
Systematically Classified

at: http://www.tentmaker.org/bullinger.htm

The term I'm looking for the the figure o f speach called Synecdoche of the Part:

Syn-ec'-do-che; ... The exchange of one idea for another associated idea.
...
Of the Part. When a part is put for the whole (Genesis 3:19. Matthew 27:4).

Gen 3:19 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition):
In the sweate of thy face shalt thou eate bread, till thou returne to the earth: for out of it wast thou taken, because thou art dust, and to dust shalt thou returne.

'sweat' for 'work' (sweat is a part of work)
'bread' for 'food' (bread is a part of food)
'dust' for 'earth' (dust is a part of earth)

IMHO, in Gen 1 & 2 'day' is used for 'time period' - some of the time periods are millions of years.

Bullard said:
Am-oe-bae'-on; or, Refrain (Psalm 136). The repetition of the same phrase at the end successive paragraphs.

The repetition in Gen 1&2 (scriptures from Geneva Bible):
Gen 1:5 "So the euening and the morning were the first day."
Gen 1:8 "So the Euening and the morning were the second day. "
Gen 1:13 "So the euening and the morning were the third day."
Gen 1:19 "So the euening and the morning were the fourth day."
Gen 1:23 "So the euening and the morning were the fifte day."
Gen 1:31: "So the euening and the morning were the sixt day."

So why do we have to be so sure that 'day' isn't a metaphor for 'the appropriate time'? Why insist that we damn our free thinking fellow humans to eternal damnation in the Hell made for the Devil by Making them get saved like this?

Rom 10:9 (Geneva Bible):
For if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus,
and shalt beleeue in thine heart, that God raised him vp from the dead,
and believe in thine heart, that the Genesis 'day' = 24-hour-day,
THEN
thou shalt be saued:
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
//I suppose a lap might be considered a table also! Would that be a metaphor Ed? //

How would I know? I don't have a lap :tear:
(Too much table, eh?)
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Give me a science reason for Christ coming back from the dead.


Sorry, this command makes as much sense as it does if I were to command you:

Give the iambic pentameter a deadbolt for red.

That is, no sense at all.

Issue a command that makes sense. ty = thank you

// When someone places the atheistic concept of evolution above the Word of GOD then I draw relevant conclusions. That is the scientific method you know, observe and draw conclusions. //

Sorry, you appear to disagree with me about what Science is. How can we have a true discussion if we don't agree on what we are talking about? We also don't seem to agree what 'evolution', 'atheistic', and 'Word of GOD' mean.

I tried to make a definition of 'science' for the agreement of others. All I got is a practical implication that I'm not worthy to talk to those superior religious folks who worship the '24-hour-day god'.

What is the basic Axiom that makes Science 'work' right?
Is it the validity of the Scientific Method?
Is it impossible?
Is the predictable nature of God?

The FACT is, the basic Axiom of Science is that the Creator God has the quality of being PREDICTABLE.

If one drops a stone and a feather from the same height under the same conditions (one found out the air pressure makes a difference) Then the results will be the same. The problem is figuring out what the 'same conditions' are.

If Satan (that accuser being) were 'creator' then there would be no predictability at all - he is a liar and the father of liars, he acts impulsively on the spur of the moment.

E=mc(squared) that God Created (of course, have to have the right units there) would be something else if there was a Satan creator. Maybe something like:

E~mc (1.5 to 12.3 power with a Gaussian distribution), well maybe

= means equal
~ means approximately
E means energy
m means mass
c is the maximum speed of light (in a vacume)

Except, of course, Gauss would never have figured out the distribution named in his honor.
 

Marcia

Active Member
IMHO, in Gen 1 & 2 'day' is used for 'time period' - some of the time periods are millions of years.



The repetition in Gen 1&2 (scriptures from Geneva Bible):
Gen 1:5 "So the euening and the morning were the first day."
Gen 1:8 "So the Euening and the morning were the second day. "
Gen 1:13 "So the euening and the morning were the third day."
Gen 1:19 "So the euening and the morning were the fourth day."
Gen 1:23 "So the euening and the morning were the fifte day."
Gen 1:31: "So the euening and the morning were the sixt day."

So why do we have to be so sure that 'day' isn't a metaphor for 'the appropriate time'? Why insist that we damn our free thinking fellow humans to eternal damnation in the Hell made for the Devil by Making them get saved like this?


There is nothing in the text to support a view to interpret "day" as a metaphor. In order to interpret "day" to mean long periods of time, there needs to be some indication from the text or from another passage of scripture about creation, that a day equaled more than a day. There is no support for this belief from the text or other references to creation. In fact, the other 2 clear references to the time of creation are in Exodus where God says both time that He created the earth in 6 days. What God says to the people at the time must makes sense to them; they would have taken this to mean 6 days, not 6 million or billion years.

If God created the earth over millions of years, why didn't he say so? Why didn't he say he created the earth over "many, many years?" There are Hebrew words for that.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Does your religion allow me to wear Velcro?
I know it isn't mentioned directly in your religious book.

1 Corinthians 10:23 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition):
All things are lawfull for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawfull for me, but all things edifie not.

Wearing Velcro and using it to hold my shoes on my feet is expedient. I have a hard time bending over to tie shoestrings. Wearing Velcro and using it to hold my shoes on my feet is edifying also. Wear some Velcro and see :)
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
// What God says to the people at the time must makes sense to them; they would have taken this to mean 6 days, not 6 million or billion years. //

And that would have been sufficient. For then there was no difference about what they did next week if it was 6 days or 6x1.5- Billion years. But now it makes a difference.

Does it make any sense at all to burn off the liquid fossil fuels in 100 years (we are nearing the half-way-gone point) that it took God a long time to make?

1. Did God make it in 4 Billion years?
2. Did God make it one week 6K years ago?

You, Your children, and/or Your grandchildren may die over the answer you pick -- so it might happen you should be real sure before you pick an answer.

so have fun - may you live in interesting times :)
 

Marcia

Active Member
// What God says to the people at the time must makes sense to them; they would have taken this to mean 6 days, not 6 million or billion years. //

And that would have been sufficient. For then there was no difference about what they did next week if it was 6 days or 6x1.5- Billion years. But now it makes a difference.

Does it make any sense at all to burn off the liquid fossil fuels in 100 years (we are nearing the half-way-gone point) that it took God a long time to make?

1. Did God make it in 4 Billion years?
2. Did God make it one week 6K years ago?

You, Your children, and/or Your grandchildren may die over the answer you pick -- so it might happen you should be real sure before you pick an answer.

so have fun - may you live in interesting times :)


Ed, I don't totally understand your post. Maybe it is above my head.

But if the people in Moses' day assumed 6 days meant 6 days, which I'm sure they did as there is no reason for them to have thought otherwise, then the answer is that it was 6 days. God would not tell them something that was not true.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Ed, I don't totally understand your post. Maybe it is above my head.

But if the people in Moses' day assumed 6 days meant 6 days, which I'm sure they did as there is no reason for them to have thought otherwise, then the answer is that it was 6 days. God would not tell them something that was not true.

Marcia

Ed Ed is just shuffling his velcro clad feet because he cannot answer your questions.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Rom 10:9 (Geneva Bible):
For if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus,
and shalt beleeue in thine heart, that God raised him vp from the dead,
and believe in thine heart, that the Genesis 'day' = 24-hour-day,
THEN
thou shalt be saued:


Ed.

Did you stay under after the third time down? Your above remarks are very strange. Also adding to Scripture is forbidden.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Ed Edwards said:
Rom 10:9 (Geneva Bible):
For if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus,
and shalt beleeue in thine heart, that God raised him vp from the dead,
and believe in thine heart, that the Genesis 'day' = 24-hour-day,
THEN thou shalt be saued:

OldRegular: // Your above remarks are very strange. Also adding to Scripture is forbidden. //

I was just reporting the the addition to the Scriptures some others make. It may be some others that don't post here, but it happens. I'm just the reporter, not the adder.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But if the people in Moses' day assumed 6 days meant 6 days, which I'm sure they did as there is no reason for them to have thought otherwise, then the answer is that it was 6 days. God would not tell them something that was not true.

I'm sure you'll cop out on this like you did before, but "the people in Moses' day" [ and how long was his "day;" 24 hours, 120 years or 4 billion years?], had "no reason to have thought otherwise" than Abraham's descendants-- the receivers of God's promise-- meant anything besides his physical descendants through Isaac and Jacob. "God would not tell them something that was not true." Not through Moses, but He would through Paul?
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by Ed Edwards
Rom 10:9 (Geneva Bible):
For if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus,
and shalt beleeue in thine heart, that God raised him vp from the dead,
and believe in thine heart, that the Genesis 'day' = 24-hour-day,
THEN thou shalt be saued:
Ed.


Response by OldRegular
Did you stay under after the third time down? Your above remarks are very strange. Also adding to Scripture is forbidden.

Response bt EdEdwards
I was just reporting the the addition to the Scriptures some others make. It may be some others that don't post here, but it happens. I'm just the reporter, not the adder.

Ed

My Mother used to say: “A guilty conscience needs no accuser!” Could that be your problem in your above response. You really did add to Scripture. No one on this Forum has indicated that a belief in a 24 hour day in Genesis 1 is required for salvation.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
The 7 days of creation are call a 'yom' (day) here:

Gen 2:4 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition):
These are the generations of the heauens and of the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heauens,

Here 'days' (plural yom) are 800 years:

Gen 5:4 (KJV1611 Edition):
And the dayes of Adam, after he had begotten Seth, were eight hundred yeeres: and he begate sonnes and daughters.

This pattern is repeated for the ancients down to Methuselah, the oldest living man. (BTW, Methuselah died before his father did :) )

Gen 5:27 (KJV1611 Edition):
And all the dayes of Methuselah were nine hundred, sixtie and nine yeeres, and he died.

So obviously the plural of yom is used to express the times of person's life.

Here 'day' is 24-hours, except the FIRST day, which would be something less than 24-hours,according to what time of day the event took place . The 8th day would also be adjustable up to 24-hours, according to what time of day the event took place.

Gen 21:4 (KJV1611 Edition):
And Abraham circumcised his sonne Isaac, being eight dayes old, as God had commanded him.

This timing of days is expanded upon in the Bible. Even today the Jews, Muslims, and American circumcise their children, after the manner of Abraham. Here is how the Jews counted those days

First day - day zero
Second day - day one
Third day - day two
Fourth day - day three
Fifth day - day four
Sixth day - day five
Seventh day - day six
Eighth day - day seven

Here is the way we would count today:

Start - day zero
First day - day one
Second day - day two
Third day - day three
Fourth day - day four
Fifth day - day five
Sixth day - day six
Seventh day - day seven
Eighth day - day eight

As one can see, there is a 24-hour difference between the two methods.

Others say: God had to adhere to MY understanding of what the Understanding of the 2ed Millennium Jew was as to what Moses (God's spoke's person) meant.

God used many millions of years to create the Universe. This fact does NOT render invalid God's Written Word in any manner. It does lead me to doubt the validity of some people's logic.

The Mentally Dead Religion-ist says:
1. If anything is wrong with the Bible, how can you trust any of it?
2. God created the Universe in 7 each 24-hour days

The Spiritually Dead Science Oriented Person believes that and notes:
1. The real creation did not take place in a literal 7-each, 24-hour days.
2. Something is wrong with the Bible, I don't trust any of it.
3. Bye

What is wrong with this picture?
Why do some pseudo-religious people condemn others to eternal damnation in a Hell built for the Devil just so they can be pig headed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top