saturneptune
New Member
Baptistblogger,
Welcome to BB, and just wanted to say that is the best post I have seen on explaining God's sovereignty. It was written in Christian love, understandable, and without arrogance and rudeness, a rare commodity here.
One problem that seems to persist in these free will debates is that somehow in former Engilsh classes everyone thinks boldness is a synonym for being rude and arrogant.
Another thing that is missing, all the time the debate is about Calvinism vs free will. It goes on and on, and says the same thing. Strangely silent is pointing out the extreme view that we do not need missions, evangelism, tracts, or any other means of spreading the Gospel, that God takes care of all that. If you go from thread to thread in other forums, you will see that is a common theme. My question to anyone is, why is the debate always centered on free will vs Calvinism? Why is Calvinism vs hyper never addressed, and to me, just as big a fallacy as free will.
Welcome to BB, and just wanted to say that is the best post I have seen on explaining God's sovereignty. It was written in Christian love, understandable, and without arrogance and rudeness, a rare commodity here.
One problem that seems to persist in these free will debates is that somehow in former Engilsh classes everyone thinks boldness is a synonym for being rude and arrogant.
Another thing that is missing, all the time the debate is about Calvinism vs free will. It goes on and on, and says the same thing. Strangely silent is pointing out the extreme view that we do not need missions, evangelism, tracts, or any other means of spreading the Gospel, that God takes care of all that. If you go from thread to thread in other forums, you will see that is a common theme. My question to anyone is, why is the debate always centered on free will vs Calvinism? Why is Calvinism vs hyper never addressed, and to me, just as big a fallacy as free will.