• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pushing your beliefs on others

Status
Not open for further replies.

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I understand, Hank.
I was just trying to highlight the fact that election refers to those who believe upon Christ and endure to the end - and thus share in the inheritance of Christ

Romans 8:17 says that we are joint heirs with Christ if we suffer with him. And then Paul went on about election and predestination.

There will be plenty of people who have believed upon Christ, and will be with him forever more - but are not among the elect.
Oh, it wasn't you alone James.

I've probably made a few dizzy myself.
:)
HankD
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Perhaps. Which passages do you mean?

(I can't think of any off hand that were in the context of evangelism, but that's not saying much).
Jesus in Jn 6,8,10
The Apostle sermons in acts....particularly in 13...and 18
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This section in 2 Peter is about false teachers in the church, not false converts.

So a false teacher in the church is not a false convert?


2 Peter 2

King James Version (KJV)


2 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.



The point here is that just as false prophets were among the People (Israel), even so false teachers would be among the believers. They are "bringing in" damnable heresy, the Church is not going out to find it. Well, that used to be true.

Here's another example:


1 John 2:19

They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.



We also look at the Parable of the wheat and tares, though here we can distinguish that the world is in view, though the point remains of a difficulty of discerning the true from the false.

As I said, it is a Biblical concept. And I would think that most would agree that false converts are a problem. This is one of the reasons God separated a People unto Himself in Israel, that they might not be contaminated by the world.


God bless.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm really not.

My point was that (in Calvinistic theology) if God has elected an individual, then he or she will certainly come to faith. That doesn't necessarily mean that I'm saying a Calvinist would not evangelize (like a hyper-Calvinist might) or that a Calvinist wouldn't care about doing things correctly.

Rather, I fail to see the true "danger" (in a salvific sense) of false conversion, as God would eventually find a way to redeem every one of his elect, even if the gospel isn't correctly presented initially.
Christianity is not a fatalistic religion like Islam. God's elect will certainly be saved, but they will not be saved as they believe false doctrine.
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Christianity is not a fatalistic religion like Islam. God's elect will certainly be saved, but they will not be saved as they believe false doctrine.

So they will be saved at some point at which they no longer believe false doctrine. What's the difference?
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Jesus in Jn 6,8,10
The Apostle sermons in acts....particularly in 13...and 18
I don't understand those passages (if I am considering the correct ones) to be preaching election as evangelism (it was granted that the Jews were considered God's chosen). What I mean is that there is no instance where election is used in terms of telling people that they may not be elect in evangelism (that I know of, anyway).
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I understand, Hank.
I was just trying to highlight the fact that election refers to those who believe upon Christ and endure to the end - and thus share in the inheritance of Christ

Romans 8:17 says that we are joint heirs with Christ if we suffer with him. And then Paul went on about election and predestination.

There will be plenty of people who have believed upon Christ, and will be with him forever more - but are not among the elect.
Elections refers to those whom God himself chose and marked out as His own, andHe then gave them the Gospel and the Spirit enabling them to respond to jesus and confirm election by getting saved!
Christianity is not a fatalistic religion like Islam. God's elect will certainly be saved, but they will not be saved as they believe false doctrine.

You MUST agree with the truth that you are a sinner, unabnle to save yourself, Jesus was God in flesh who died in your place, took on your sins and paid your sin penalty, and believe God raised Him from the dead, so yes, election is from/of God, but so are certain truths to hold with!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So they will be saved at some point at which they no longer believe false doctrine. What's the difference?
In His sovereign grcae, there will be a time when He will so act as to bring the sinner to Himself, as in irresistable Grace!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't understand those passages (if I am considering the correct ones) to be preaching election as evangelism (it was granted that the Jews were considered God's chosen). What I mean is that there is no instance where election is used in terms of telling people that they may not be elect in evangelism (that I know of, anyway).
We give the seed to all, and God will handle who the elect of his are!
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In His sovereign grcae, there will be a time when He will so act as to bring the sinner to Himself, as in irresistable Grace!

Which is why I raised the question in the first place. If something is definitely going to happen with absolute 100% certainty, then the risk of it not happening is 0%.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Which is why I raised the question in the first place. If something is definitely going to happen with absolute 100% certainty, then the risk of it not happening is 0%.
We still have to receive Jesus, make a choice for Him, in order to get saved!
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
We give the seed to all, and God will handle who the elect of his are!
I agree with you. I like what JamesL said about election being an eschatological hope, as this is how Scripture often presents election. I disagree that this is not speaking of all believers, but I think that the terms is looking forward from the standpoint of being saved. We never see Paul skipping the proud, arrogant pagan because he is not among the elect. Paul doesn't know (or, probable more precisely, Paul knows that this was once himself....yet God drew him to salvation).
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I agree with you. I like what JamesL said about election being an eschatological hope, as this is how Scripture often presents election. I disagree that this is not speaking of all believers, but I think that the terms is looking forward from the standpoint of being saved. We never see Paul skipping the proud, arrogant pagan because he is not among the elect. Paul doesn't know (or, probable more precisely, Paul knows that this was once himself....yet God drew him to salvation).
Jesus told us how hard to save one trusing on anything but God to save them, but all things possible for God!
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jesus told us how hard to save one trusing on anything but God to save them, but all things possible for God!
WHAT!? He gave man free will without violating His absolute sovereignty!?

Amazing! I guess He can do anything.

:)

HankD
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So they will be saved at some point at which they no longer believe false doctrine. What's the difference?
Your view is wretchedly fatalistic, full of human reasoning and against the word of God. He says,

'All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore........' (Matthew 28:18-19). If all authority has been given to Christ, why do we need to do anything? His will is going to be done in any case so let's sit back and let Him get on with it! When William Carey first suggested a mission to India, an elderly minister is supposed to have said to him, "Young man; sit down! When it pleases God to save the heathen he will do so without your help or mine!"

But this view is desperately earthly. It is precisely because God is utterly sovereign that we are to go! "Go therefore and make disciples." The God who declares, "I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy" (Romans 9:15) and decreed salvation for a vast crowd of sinners has also decreed the means of their salvation- the Gospel of Jesus Christ faithfully preached. They will not be saved without hearing the Gospel (Romans 10:14-15). And that is why David Brainard, dying from Consumption, forced himself through the American wilderness to reach the Red Indian tribes and bring the Gospel to them. He was a five-point Calvinist, but he wanted to see God's name glorified among the heathen.

Today, people are perishing because of a false gospel. We don't know who is elect or who isn't and that should not be our concern. Our concern should be the glory of God! 'For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you' (Romans 2:24). 'Whatever you do, do all to the glory of God' (1 Corinthians 10:31).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top