Questions for those holding to KJVO Position

[Conan]

Remember, this site sells 1611, 1612, so on and so forth Bibles for a lot of money. They have the ancient Bibles on hand , so they know what they are talking about.

Lost Books of The KJV Bible?

Finally, there was one last change made to the King James Version Bible in 1885: the removal of 14 Books of The Bible! Prior to 1885, all English Bibles, including all King James Bibles, had 80 Books. Since 1885, we only find 66 Books in our Bibles. The missing Books, which were called the Deuterocanonical or Apocryphal Books were so important to King James that he threatened anyone who printed his Bible without these books, with a year in jail and heavy fines. This is all shocking to people who do not know the full story of the King James Bible, and the mystery and intrigue does not end there. The actual printing of the 1611 King James Bible was an extremely complex and confusing endeavor, involving two dozen printers, resulting in thousands of copies that were actually printed in 1611 being given bewildering title pages dated 1613, 1617, 1634, and 1639. If you would like to know the full story, just read our article on the 1611 Bible.

Home

World’s Largest Dealer of Rare & Antique BiblesVIEW AVAILABLE ANCIENT BIBLES Rare & Antique Holy Bibles GREATSITE.COM is the premiere online showroom of rare and antique Bibles. Since 1996 we have been the world’s largest dealer of rare & antique Bibles... over 29 years! Our...

greatsite.com

 

[Salty]

That would require there to be errors in the KJV. However, there aren't any, and no one has actually been able to provide one. Simply all the "errors" are either 1) not errors or 2) are actually superior translations.

Does the KJV support immersion only for Baptism - or does it allow for sprinkling/pouring?

 

[Servant of Jehovah]

Lost Books of The KJV Bible?

Finally, there was one last change made to the King James Version Bible in 1885: the removal of 14 Books of The Bible! Prior to 1885, all English Bibles, including all King James Bibles, had 80 Books. Since 1885, we only find 66 Books in our Bibles. The missing Books, which were called the Deuterocanonical or Apocryphal Books were so important to King James that he threatened anyone who printed his Bible without these books, with a year in jail and heavy fines. This is all shocking to people who do not know the full story of the King James Bible, and the mystery and intrigue does not end there. The actual printing of the 1611 King James Bible was an extremely complex and confusing endeavor, involving two dozen printers, resulting in thousands of copies that were actually printed in 1611 being given bewildering title pages dated 1613, 1617, 1634, and 1639. If you would like to know the full story, just read our article on the 1611 Bible.

Home

World’s Largest Dealer of Rare & Antique BiblesVIEW AVAILABLE ANCIENT BIBLES Rare & Antique Holy Bibles GREATSITE.COM is the premiere online showroom of rare and antique Bibles. Since 1996 we have been the world’s largest dealer of rare & antique Bibles... over 29 years! Our...

greatsite.com

This us ignorant. King James did not find them "important." In fact, he himself states that he OMITTED THEM!

"And as to the Apocryphe bookes, I omit them, because I am no Papist. As I said before; and indeed some of them are no wayes like the dytement of the Spirit of God." King James I, in ΒΑΣΙΛΙΚΟΝ ΔΩΡΟΝ

And if you think a source stating 1885 was the last change made to the KJV text is correct, you are mistaken. The edition of the KJV I use in the Pure Cambridge Edition, which was printed in the 1900's. I've actually looked at photoscans. I will say this one time more, you should look at things yourself. If one does not want to actually look themselves, but instead wants to post a website that has no clue what it's speaking about, then I have no reason to continue talking, as it's clear they will not look at the evidence.

 

[Servant of Jehovah]

Does the KJV support immersion only for Baptism - or does it allow for sprinkling/pouring?

Baptism is just a transliteration of the Greek. Thus, the question you're really asking is whether the Greek supports immersion only—which I believe the Bible teaches Baptism by immersion.