• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Recognizing irregular church doctrines.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
There is no relationship or association that can be made between:


And:

Historic "Baptists" (like the ones you mentioned in tracing Landmark churches).

Their two different definitions of what constitutes the meaning expressed and the definition of the word, "baptism", are as far apart as night is from day.

To confuse "Historic" Baptists with anything having to do with the Didache is totally irresponsible, when the only similarity to be drawn between the two is their both using a word that starts with the letter, "b".

Red flag on the play.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
There is no relationship or association that can be made between



And:



Their two different definitions of what constitutes the meaning expressed and the definition of the word, "baptism", are as far apart as night is from day.

To confuse "Historic" Baptists with anything having to do with the Didache is totally irresponsible, when the only similarity to be drawn between the two is their both using a word that starts with the letter, "b".

Red flag on the play.
I'm not making any link between the Didache and Baptists.

You are making a link between the Didache and Baptists that I never made.

In fact, the Didache presents baptism as being by immersion (only when impossible does it permit pouring).

My point is that believers baptism was not always by immersion. In the "landmark" churches you point to "baptism" was often by pouring.

Likewise, reexamining your post you seem to confuse the baptism of John the Baptist with the Baptism of Christ (where Paul makes a distinction).

Also, you seem to deny that baptism represents the "forgiveness of sins" (something Luke proclaimed in Acts 2).
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
@Alan Gross
The evidence strongly suggests the Didache is nothing more than an 11th century forgery.

AN EVALUATION OF THE DIDACHE - franknelte.net
How, when you posted it was quoted from in the early 4th Century?

It appears you are reaching, searching that well known source called "google" to find anybody that supports your view.

It is also suggested that the NT was written by men in the mid 2nd Century.

BUT most scholars believe that the Didache was written between 50 AD and 70 AD (based on the description of the church).

We know it was written by the 4th century because it is quoted by several 4th Century Christians.

Unless you believe in time travel, you will be hard pressed to justify the idea it was written after the 4th Century.
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
We as Baptists do not always agree on the identity of irregular church church doctrines. There are those we as Baptist hold in common that constitute Baptist districtives.
Such as believer's immersion.

One thing to note, irregular church doctrines are always contrary to the clear Apostolic teaching of the New Testament.

Believers baptism by immersion is a misnomer in itself and there is no agreement among Baptists on the doctrine of baptism. A more accurate name might be "professors" baptism. Just because we insist on baptism by immersion does not mean that everyone who we baptize is actually a true believer. Certainly baptism in water is not part of the gospel of salvation.

1Co 1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

Paul was not a member of the local church at Corinth and did not even claim to be a Baptist as far as I can tell, yet he baptized Crispus and Gaius and the family of Stephanus, and they were members of the church.

The mode of baptism by immersion in water is the only part of Baptism on which all Baptists seems to agree. The purpose of God in commanding baptism and it's symbolic meaning is certainly not a point of agreement. This is illustrated on this very forum by a Landmarker, whose systematic doctrinal position assigns all kinds of heresies to it's practice, as well as to it's meaning, even to who may or may not baptize to make it acceptable in their circle. Paul, the great apostle of the faith would not qualify in their system.

Baptism by immersion in water does convey a real and actual purpose of God in reality. Baptism by immersion in water did not begin with the church of Jesus Christ. It began with the deliverance of Israel from Egypt by Moses, a picture of the spiritual new birth.

1Co 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;
4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.
6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.
9 Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents.
10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer.
11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.
12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God [is] faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.

Therefore, in everything but the mode, baptism is an irregular doctrine among Baptist groups.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Just because we insist on baptism by immersion does not mean that everyone who we baptize is actually a true believer.
Acts of the Apostles 8:12-13, ". . . they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, . . ."
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
Acts of the Apostles 8:12-13, ". . . they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, . . ."

Yes and here;
Mt 13:24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

(bundles = denominations and religious movements & cults, a characteristic of these days we are now living in?)

1Jo 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
 
Last edited:

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Such as what…please Give examples thank you
The preterism myth-the KJVO myth-Calvinism-Lent-Word,Faith-Seven church ages myth-oneness or modalism, to name a few. (Now let the arguments begin! Please provide SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT for any of those you believe. Without Scriptural support, they're automatically false.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The preterism myth-the KJVO myth-Calvinism-Lent-Word,Faith-Seven church ages myth-oneness or modalism, to name a few. (Now let the arguments begin! Please provide SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT for any of those you believe. Without Scriptural support, they're automatically false.
To be exact I do not know what your interpretation of Calvinism is… like is it reformed theology that spells out a certain soteriology (doctrines of Grace), is it predetermination, is it sacramental salvation , Lordship Salvation, etc.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
bundles = denominations and religious movements & cults, a characteristic of these days we are now living in?)
No. The bundles are the religious and lost. Every Baptist church is a denomination unto itself being autonomous.
 

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
To be exact I do not know what your interpretation of Calvinism is… like is it reformed theology that spells out a certain soteriology (doctrines of Grace), is it predetermination, is it sacramental salvation , Lordship Salvation, etc.

The Doctrines of Grace are Eternal.

What is it about Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and the Perseverance of the Saints that the Triune GODHEAD didn't know in Eternity Past?

New thread:
The Doctrines of Grace are Eternal.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
No. The bundles are the religious and lost. Every Baptist church is a denomination unto itself being autonomous.
Disagree!!!

When the word "denomination" many automatically think of a hierarchy organization.
But there are many definitions. The three that pertain to churches:
1) A hierarchy
2) A group of similar churches that do not have hierarchy control
3) A group that has similar (not identical) beliefs. (no organization needed)

Bottom line - "Baptists" can be considered a denomination. - It is not a dirty word!

Its just like the music called Gospel. Many think it is only Black Gospel - It also pertains to Southern Gospel - two totally types of music.

For more detail
Biden reelection bid faces resistance from some Democrats


denomination
Also found in: Thesaurus, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to denomination: Baptist denomination
de·nom·i·na·tion
n.
1. A large group of religious congregations united under a common faith and name, usually organized under a single administrative and legal hierarchy.


1. (Theology) a group having a distinctive interpretation of a religious faith and usually its own organization

n.
1. a religious group, usu. including many local churches.

a set of the same persons, called by the same name and therefore of the same views. See also communion, confession.
Examples: denomination of Bapists; denomination - a group of religious congregations having its own organization and a distinctive faith

denomination
noun
1. Those who accept and practice a particular religious belief:
church, communion, faith, persuasion, sect.
2. A system of religious belief:
confession, creed, faith, persuasion, religion, sect.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Well it is like the mentioned Epistle to the Laodicea church. What we have is a forgery which claims to be it.
Again (not for you but members who may be interested):

The majority of Christian scholars date the Didache between 50 AD and 70 AD.

Most scholars outside of this majority date the Didache between 120 AD and 180 AD.

A few people date the Didache in the 3rd to 4th Century AD.

The evidence within the Didache (its description of the church) places it prior to Christianity becoming the official religion of Rome (between 50 AD and the 4th Century).

Writers prior to the mid 4th century have quoted the Didache.

BUT if you look online for a supporter of what you want, you will most likely find it. But that does not make it true.

Why people want the Didache to be forgery is typically to support RCC and Presbyterian doctrine because it presents a Baptist form of baptism as the norm.

We know from many baptistic doctrines that early "baptists" poured water rather than immersing believers routinely - BUT this is not what the Didache advocates (the Didache advocates baptism by immersion).
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Baptisms should only be received from "like faith and order" Congregations.
I think there is an error here. One is not baptized into a church, nor indeed, into a denomination. One is baptized into Christ (Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:27). I was 'baptized' as an infant into the Church of England. Much later, when I became a Christian, I was baptized by immersion at a Brethren Assembly on my confession of Christ. That is my baptism and anyone who wants me to have another one can, in the nicest possible way, go and boil his head.
There is no likelihood of my leaving my current church (except in a box) but suppose I emigrate to the USA and finding myself in you neighbourhood, I apply to join your church. You have every right to interview me, to demand that I sign up to you church constitution and Statement of Faith. You have the right to write to my former church(es) to find out if I behaved myself. But to expect someone to submit to re-baptism when he has already been baptized as a believer is a non-starter so far as I'm concerned ...... unless, of course, the baptism was non-Trinitarian (eg. JWs, Mormons etc.)..
 

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
I think there is an error here. One is not baptized into a church, nor indeed, into a denomination. One is baptized into Christ (Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:27). I was 'baptized' as an infant into the Church of England. Much later, when I became a Christian, I was baptized by immersion at a Brethren Assembly on my confession of Christ. That is my baptism and anyone who wants me to have another one can, in the nicest possible way, go and boil his head.
There is no likelihood of my leaving my current church (except in a box) but suppose I emigrate to the USA and finding myself in you neighbourhood, I apply to join your church. You have every right to interview me, to demand that I sign up to you church constitution and Statement of Faith. You have the right to write to my former church(es) to find out if I behaved myself. But to expect someone to submit to re-baptism when he has already been baptized as a believer is a non-starter so far as I'm concerned ...... unless, of course, the baptism was non-Trinitarian (eg. JWs, Mormons etc.)..


Looks like, "Gathering to His Name: the Story of Open Brethren in Britain and Ireland (2006), the standard one-volume history of the Brethren movement. It is an edited version of an article that first appeared in Grace Magazine (July 2008).
Origins (1825-50)

"The story begins early in the 19th century. Politically and socially, this was a turbulent period in Britain and Ireland: after the French Revolution many feared that similar events might occur here. The Industrial Revolution and later depression brought widespread unrest and economic hardship. It was a time of rapid change in all aspects of life. In the churches, unsettlement took the forms of dissatisfaction with the perceived worldliness of the churches and a longing for more intense spiritual experience.

"Several movements originated around 1830, seeking spiritual renewal and purer fellowship. The Strict Baptists took shape as a distinct body; those associated with Edward Irving formed churches governed by apostles and claiming a restoration of the spiritual gifts and ministries mentioned in the New Testament (they were later known as the Catholic Apostolic Church); what became known as Anglo-Catholicism took shape in the Church of England; and the Brethren came into existence. Their earliest meetings were in Ireland (Dublin especially) and Plymouth (giving rise to the designation ‘Plymouth Brethren’). Their aim was to provide a fellowship in which all true believers could worship together, gathered round the Lord’s Table, and study the Scriptures without being divided by differing denominational allegiances."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top