Understatement!One can only hope that the Second Chance is not wasted. Since Congress as a body (both parties included) is almost as competent as a bunch of baboons, I am not optimistic.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Understatement!One can only hope that the Second Chance is not wasted. Since Congress as a body (both parties included) is almost as competent as a bunch of baboons, I am not optimistic.
We could all come up with scores of "what ifs" Ben.Yet, the idea of healthcare entitlement needs to be addressed or regulated at some point along the line.
For instance, should a 350lb diabetic man on expensive dialysis who won’t put down his fork be entitled to get a $260,000+ kidney transplant which may allow him to live 5 years longer? When you consider that it takes something like a year’s worth of over 100 working family’s premiums to pay for that one surgery it suggests that accountability for one’s own health should perhaps be a control (regulated) factor. How about the $40,000 joint replacements they are handing out like candy nowadays to people that are carrying around more than 100lbs of extra weight? Should they not have to bear more of the "weight" of the cost?
Compassion and entitlement need to factor in personal responsibility or no national health plan will be affordable…
Yet, the idea of healthcare entitlement needs to be addressed or regulated at some point along the line.
For instance, should a 350lb diabetic man on expensive dialysis who won’t put down his fork be entitled to get a $260,000+ kidney transplant which may allow him to live 5 years longer? When you consider that it takes something like a year’s worth of over 100 working family’s premiums to pay for that one surgery it suggests that accountability for one’s own health should perhaps be a control (regulated) factor. How about the $40,000 joint replacements they are handing out like candy nowadays to people that are carrying around more than 100lbs of extra weight? Should they not have to bear more of the "weight" of the cost?
Compassion and entitlement need to factor in personal responsibility or no national health plan will be affordable…
I believe I’d be in favor of premiums proportionate to lifestyle choices.Benjamin - you have an excellent point - challenge is - who would determine who should receive certain medical procedures.
Should a smoker be required to wait on certain operations,.......
And you tell a liberal that they are not entitled to top of the line medical coverage that they don't pay for unless they they take on some responsibility for their health and they scream "death panel"...And I thought "conservatives" were opposed to "death panels".
I can tell you with absolute certainty that no flight is made without cost. You just were not the one who received the bill.
We'll see.Trump has no "brain trust." It's just him, if you believe him. His appointees, by and large, have disavowed his opinions (I would say beliefs, but that would be too strong a word unless you buy into his megalomania.)
Not I saved41199. They deserve even more.No because my family was already paying a price that less than 1% of the US pays...the sacrifice of a military career...or are you opposed to the benefits that military families get?
Yet, the idea of healthcare entitlement needs to be addressed or regulated at some point along the line.
For instance, should a 350lb diabetic man on expensive dialysis who won’t put down his fork be entitled to get a $260,000+ kidney transplant which may allow him to live 5 years longer? When you consider that it takes something like a year’s worth of over 100 working family’s premiums to pay for that one surgery it suggests that accountability for one’s own health should perhaps be a control (regulated) factor. How about the $40,000 joint replacements they are handing out like candy nowadays to people that are carrying around more than 100lbs of extra weight? Should they not have to bear more of the "weight" of the cost?
Compassion and entitlement need to factor in personal responsibility or no national health plan will be affordable…
Yet I must ask you, who are you to judge? Who are you to decide who's life is worth more.
A 350lb man is probably not going to qualify for a transplant anyway...OK? And, if he's on dialysis, he's on a pretty strict diet.
You seem to have missed or ignored the point, as in, who are you to judge how much of other people’s money you are entitled to for your healthcare, without limits, without responsibility, and without any accountability for your own lifestyle choices? Or maybe you believe there should be no limits, no regulations and there is no need for controlling the costs?
How would you infer that he is against military compensation just because he pointed out that there is still a monetary cost associated with each procedure? If you can't refute his post, there is no need to go on the attack.No because my family was already paying a price that less than 1% of the US pays...the sacrifice of a military career...or are you opposed to the benefits that military families get?
No because my family was already paying a price that less than 1% of the US pays...the sacrifice of a military career...
or are you opposed to the benefits that military families get?
But how does one determine poor lifestyle choices? For instance, you've focused quite a bit of attention on weight, but for some health issues excessive weight is a symptom of the illness, not the cause of it. For instance, Cushing's Disease. It's hard to diagnose, and a lot of doctors don't test for it because they just assume patients who present with the symptoms simply need to get off the sofa and stop eating chips, when the reality is quite the opposite.Are they entitled to get the same type of coverage that someone who pays those higher premiums because of their poor lifestyle choices do?
So if you gain at the expense of others, without limits, responsibility or accountability and without concern for controlling the costs, which is your right as per the grace the God, such a practice is okay because it is His money. Therefore, I have no point worth factoring in to this formula of yours. Hmm…I'm starting to see a pattern here with you putting words in other's mouths rather than dealing with the issues...Your money? It's "yours"? I thought that all gain was through the grace of God. Remember, like Job, God can strip you of everything in a heartbeat.
ut how does one determine poor lifestyle choices? For instance, you've focused quite a bit of attention on weight, but for some health issues excessive weight is a symptom of the illness, not the cause of it. For instance, Cushing's Disease. It's hard to diagnose, and a lot of doctors don't test for it because they just assume patients who present with the symptoms simply need to get off the sofa and stop eating chips, when the reality is quite the opposite.
So if you gain at the expense of others, without limits, responsibility or accountability and without concern for controlling the costs, which is your right as per the grace the God, such a practice is okay because it is His money. Therefore, I have no point worth factoring in to this formula of yours. Hmm…I'm starting to see a pattern here with you putting words in other's mouths rather than dealing with the issues...