The will and power of God to save does not matter?Doesn't matter.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The will and power of God to save does not matter?Doesn't matter.
The will and power of God to save does not matter?
If Calvinism is true then why would it be difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God?
It is impossible for a rich unbeliever , who does not have faith, to enter into the Kingdom of God, because their heart is wrapped up in their money.
If a person trusts in money, they cannot serve God. So it is very difficult for the rich who think they are self made to enter the kingdom. But the truth of God's granting riches to some fixes this.
Many drunks are elect too but the bottle has a grip on them, so they say.If one is elect (according to the false Calvinist definition of it) and rich there should be no difficulty.
Many drunks are elect too but the bottle has a grip on them, so they say.
Think of how hard is is for a womanizer to enter the kingdom of God. Yet scripture mentions them among God's elect.You are only making my point. rich, drunk or otherwise. Jesus said these influences in their lives makes it more difficult to bring them to salvation. If the cal definition of election is true then it cannot be true, what Jesus said, or God finds it difficult to bring them to salvation.
Think of how hard is is for a womanizer to enter the kingdom of God. Yet scripture mentions them among God's elect.
1588. ἐκλεκτός ĕklĕktŏs, ek-lek-tos´.; from 1586; select; by impl. favorite:—chosen, elect.Your question assumes your own definition of "elect" which of course I reject. Since I reject your definition your sentence makes no sense. The fact that it is hard for a rich man, a drunk, or a womanizer to come to Christ means there is a deliberate use of reason and inner struggle. They are actually considering two different options. There is nothing mentioned about either being conditionally elect or not being conditionally elect. What is mentioned is the love of those things which is greater than the love of God. Conditional election is neither mentioned nor implied.
1588. ἐκλεκτός ĕklĕktŏs, ek-lek-tos´.; from 1586; select; by impl. favorite:—chosen, elect.
Strong, J. (2009). A Concise Dictionary of the Words in the Greek Testament and The Hebrew Bible (Vol. 1, p. 26).
a rich unbeliever
Here's both sides of the issue:“So in the same way at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace. And if it is by grace, it is no longer by works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace. What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was diligently seeking, but the elect obtained it. The rest were hardened, as it is written, “God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, to this very day.”” (Romans 11:5–8)That does not clear it up.
Here's both sides of the issue:“So in the same way at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace. And if it is by grace, it is no longer by works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace. What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was diligently seeking, but the elect obtained it. The rest were hardened, as it is written, “God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, to this very day.”” (Romans 11:5–8)
Luk 18:24 Jesus, seeing that he had become sad, said, “How difficult it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!
Luk 18:25 For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.”
If Calvinism is true then why would it be difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God?
The Countess of Huntingdon used to say that she had been saved by the letter 'M.' If God had chosen 'not any of noble birth' instead of 'not many of noble birth' she would not have been saved.“For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:26–29)
When did the blinding happen that they were born blind?Why does a dead man (as cals define dead) have to be blinded by God?
He called Him 'Good teacher.' People who called the Lord Jesus, "teacher" or "Rabbi" usually got a dusty answer because they didn't know who He is. Those who call Him "Lord" or "Son of David" (i.e. Messiah) get a much better response (e.g. Blind Bartimaeus, Syro-Phoenician woman).Incredible. "He ran to Christ, kneeled before Him, and saluted Him with language intended for the divine. Christ loved him and did not dispute his claim of doing no ill towards his neighbor", and you write him off as an unbeliever.
When did the blinding happen that they were born blind?