Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Acts 17:11 the Church apostles "themselves" are "judged" by non-church members and even "approved for doing it" since the judgment is based on the "Word of God".Originally posted by Matt Black:
...except that that teaching authority - that of the Church - was founded on Christ and the Apostles, not some latter-day 'prophet'.]
That is a red herring. There are many parts of this world today which still do not have the complete New Testament. When Adoniram Judson went to Burma they had no Bible at all, neither did William Carey when he went to India. But that didn't stop them from establishing churches. Paul went to Berea. The Bereans had the Old Testament (more than the Burmese or Indians had). They also had the direct revelation of God that was given to Paul from God.Originally posted by Matt Black:
In Acts 17:11 the NT had not been given. Therefore the 'word of God' was incomplete; they only had the OT to go on.
The likelihood of false teaching arising made it a necessity for the teaching authority to which I refer being established. It was, and those errors - gnosticism in all its forms, Marcionism, Montanism, the various Trinitarian and Christological heresies - were dealt with effectively by that authority.
RC does Latria on the statue of a dead woman.Originally posted by Matt Black:
Define idolatry. (Hint: the root is in the Greek latria)
Oh oh. More of Catholicisms meaningless little word games."Define idolatry. (Hint: the root is in the Greek latria )"
I think you accused me of this before, and I gave you an acceptable answer. Faith is not a work. Trust is not a work. Confidence (which faith is) is not a work. Work is something that you do, as in baptism.Originally posted by Matt Black:
Then you are turning faith itself into a work.
I quoted you what was written. Neither does faith nor the Holy Spirit work through a sacrament. There are no sacraments in the Bible. Sacraments are man-made. And the sacraments of the RCC are an abomination in His sight. Transubstantiation is heresy. The Holy Spirit does not work through transubstantiation. The Holy Spirit does not work through the water of baptism either. The water does not suddenly turn holy by some magical power. That is sorcery, witchcraft. There is no grace imparted through the sacrament of baptism. The Holy Spirit does not work through the water in baptism. It is heresy. Water will get you wet and that is all. Your approach to baptism using a sacramental approach is more akin to the occult than to Biblical Christianity, which makes it all the more reason to put it into the realm of a cult.Er...that's not what the quote says. It is the Holy Spirit who works through the word of God and the sacraments Jesus instituted.
You have given no evidence to support your position. John 3:5, for example talks about the new birth. That is not a sacrament. In fact baptism is not even mentioned in that passage. The word "sacrament" is not found in the Bible, not even once. Again that passage is speaking about faith, and faith alone. If one is born again is he is born of the Spirit by putting his faith in Christ.Only according to your personal interpretation of the Bible. If however you, as countless Christians have done from Apostolic times, read the Scriptures through the illumination of the Holy Spirit as mediated through Christ's Church, then you will be able to see that there is plenty in Scripture to support a sacramental economy of sanctification - Mark 16:16, Jn 3:5, Jn 6:32-59,Acts 2:38-39.
This is what makes the RCC a works salvation.
It is a works salvation. I was there for 20 years, and yes I have studied the catechism and have a copy of the documents of Vatican II sitting right beside me. You must be a member of the Catholic Church to be saved. You must be baptized of the Catholic Church to be saved. You must keep the sacraments to be saved. You must not fall into mortal sin in order to maintain your salvation. That in itself makes it a works salvation. It is do, do, do, do, etc. What happens in the Catholic church if one never confesses their sins to a priest? The Bible says that is not necessary, but the man-made rules of the Catholic Church says it is? Works--do, do, do! It is a works based salvation!No it doesn't! It isn't! How many times to I have to state the glaringly obvious! You obviously haven't bothered to read the links I gave to the Catechism or the JDDJ; if you did, it would be staring at you in the face that it is not a 'works' salvation. (We really need a 'bashing my head against a brick wall' graemlin.)
Another contradiction. So baptism was an "ordinance" or command given or instituted by Christ. It is not a sacrament. It does not impart grace. Nothing magical happens to the one receiving the baptism. That is sorcery to believe such. "God sanctifying grace is NOT communicated through these." When you get baptized you get wet. Baptism is purely symbolic, as are the elements of the Lord's Table. They do not change. Wine is wine, and bread is bread. They are symbolic. A marriage ceremony is a marriage ceremony. It is not a sacrament. Two people get married. Does a special explosion of grace suddenly come upon them? No. The Catholic Church believes in witchcraft. It is occultic practicing sorcery, changing those things that are symbolic into that which is supposedly magical.Faith does not work through the sacraments; however God's sanctifying grace is communicated (amongst other ways) through these. These are however not works of man but works of God - how can they be otherwise, since they were instituted by the Lord Himself?!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Matt Black:
...except that that teaching authority - that of the Church - was founded on Christ and the Apostles, not some latter-day 'prophet'.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acts 17:11 the Church apostles "themselves" are "judged" by non-church members and even "approved for doing it" since the judgment is based on the "Word of God".
In Acts 20 we are told that from "WITHIN" the church errors would arise.
In 2Thess 2 we see the "predicted apostacy" of the church.
But in all this - God has true believers like John the baptizer standing for truth when his generation was going into apostacy (in the case of the one true church pre-cross)
Are you making your point or mine?Matt said
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Acts 17:11 the NT had not been given. Therefore the 'word of God' was incomplete; they only had the OT to go on.
By "effective" do you refer to the "extermination" policy of Lateran IV?Matt said
The likelihood of false teaching arising made it a necessity for the teaching authority to which I refer being established. It was, and those errors - gnosticism in all its forms, Marcionism, Montanism, the various Trinitarian and Christological heresies - were dealt with effectively by that authority.
Excellent PointOriginally posted by BobRyan:
do you refer to Catholic armies sent out to slaughter rival Catholics ?
The Inquisition?
What "error" was "exterminated"? [/QB]
Ooops!"It's tomorrow here already! Sleep well and have a good one yourself.
And I can, sadly, confirm all of this as being true. I lived my 1st 24 years as a Catholic amd this is just what the Catholic Church is and promotes."It is a works salvation. I was there for 20 years, and yes I have studied the catechism and have a copy of the documents of Vatican II sitting right beside me. You must be a member of the Catholic Church to be saved. You must be baptized of the Catholic Church to be saved. You must keep the sacraments to be saved. You must not fall into mortal sin in order to maintain your salvation. That in itself makes it a works salvation. It is do, do, do, do, etc. What happens in the Catholic church if one never confesses their sins to a priest? The Bible says that is not necessary, but the man-made rules of the Catholic Church says it is? Works--do, do, do! It is a works based salvation!"
Is one of the 10 commandments a nonsense ?Originally posted by Briony-Gloriana:
Dear Eliyahu.....
The question did not warrant an answer because it is nonsense.
.
Its not too strong at all."Dear D28guy...the section saying that the RCC states the individual has no right to interpret the scripture....is a little strong I feel...
Not only do the postings on this board prove that the "sola scriptura" approach is infinetly superior to the cultic "truth gestapo" approach of the Catholic Church...but just evaluating the evangelical/pentecostal world in general proves the superiority of Gods "sola scriptura" truth."....evidence on this Board alone indicates the errors of translation when individuals attempt to decipher aspects of the Gospel."
Neither have I, and yet I, and millions just like me, have a much much much clearer view of the scriptures than the cultic "Teaching Magesterium" of the Catholic Church.I have not studied Greek or Hebrew..."
That is the biggest mistake you could possibly make."...and when I study the Bible, I do not hesitate to contact my priest on questions in regards to Biblical interpretation."
He actually has, sadly, many years of being indoctrinated in false teaching, idolatry, and a false gospel."He has had the benefit on many years of theological training, therefore it is part of his function as pastor to his flock"
1st of all, more than likely only a small percentage of Catholics are christians, and almost none of those can possibly be a part of the organised "clergy"."I'm sad that some of you are so quick to toss around words like 'heresy', 'idolatry', 'false gospel', and 'cultic' when talking about the Catholic Christians."
I guess you have a problem with Jesus Christ for calling false religious leaders "white washed tombs" who were "filled with dead mens bones" and telling them they are "of your Father the devil"?"It is statements like those bring shame on God's church, pain to his children, and confusion for those who aren't believers."
Who is denying that?"As I've said before, God's love for his children - especially those who are the most unlovable - is never ending."
I have great great love for those who have been lied to and victimised by the Catholic Church. I love them enough to tell them the truth."Do you people have no morsel of love for your brothers and sisters?"
I will tell you that because it is the truth."And DO NOT give me that reply about 'Oh, we love them and it would be unloving not to point out their errors'."
So have I."I've been around long enough to tell the difference between a horse, a horse's rear, and what comes out a horse's rear."
"You are of your Father the devil""When you claim that you really, really love them and then use such cutting words, that is nothing more than what comes out a horse's rear."