• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Supposedly "KJV Only" Refuted At This Link

Hark

Well-Known Member
You are certainly wrong here. A believer can recognize the KJV as the word of God, and be mature enough to know that it is not always right, but contains mistakes that should be corrected to have the word of God more complete. To pretend the KJV is always right is fantasie and a man made lie, devoid of accurate Bible study.

I believe you are allowing other people's prejudices to keep you from relying on Him in proving or disproving their ant-KJV claims. You should prove everything by Him. You will be facing Him one day & all the people of anti-KJVOnlyism is not going to be able to defend you for following the crowd.

2 Corinthians 5:9 Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him. 10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. 11 Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences.

I do not know all that KJVOnlyism represent but I am called to be a disciple of Jesus Christ, trusting Him to be my personal Good Shepherd to help me to follow Him, even discerning which Bible version keeps His words that proves they loved Him;

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. 24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me. KJV

John 15:20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. KJV

I cannot prove that for you. He has done it for me. Do you trust Jesus Christ as your personal Good Shepherd to do that for you?
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dr. Van Soden did not collate more than 400 out of the 5,000 Greek texts.
.

Four hundred Greek NT manuscripts imperfectly collated is a larger number than the fewer than 100 or fewer than 50 incompletely and imperfectly collated for the textually-varying printed editions of the Textus Receptus.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Scripture told you how the Holy Spirit would bear witness in leading you to do also in worship; to testify of the Son to glorify the Son & thereby God the Father. You are not led by the Spirit of God in worship to honor, nor glorify the Holy Spirit but the Son, & by Him, God the Father.

Scripture told you what the Holy Spirit will do.. John 15:26-27 & John 16:14 So are you led by the Spirit to do that in worship or not?
So the Spirit Himself is God, and yet cannot pray to or worship as God?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are certainly wrong here. A believer can recognize the KJV as the word of God, and be mature enough to know that it is not always right, but contains mistakes that should be corrected to have the word of God more complete. To pretend the KJV is always right is fantasie and a man made lie, devoid of accurate Bible study.
ALL translations need to be corrected by the hebrew and greek in places!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Th

The KJVO myth is the false doctrine that the KJV is the ONLY valid English Bible translation, & that it's perfect.

I have posted the MAN-MADE ORIGIN of the current edition of that myth elsewhere in this "Bible Versions" forum. But NO believer of the KJVO myth can support that myth with SCRIPTURE from the KJV.(Or any other version)

Dr. Bob has posted an excellent rundown of the definitions of the KJVO myth in this forum at the beginning of it, in the "sticky posts" column.

Have you ever asked your self WHY some of the wording is changed in newer versions, besides getting rid of the archaic English? The MAIN reason is that some of the renderings are WRONG. For instance, "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is an outright GOOF. Newer versions replace it with the CORRECT rendering od "passover".

Now, while MVs have their own mistakes, the KJV is chock-full of them !
I have yet to read in the Nas or esv or Nkjv these heresies they have been alleged to bring into their translations by the KJVO gang!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your opinion is incorrect.

KJV-onlyism is really all about making exclusive, only claims for only one English Bible translation and about in effect trying to imply perfection or near perfection for that one imperfect English translation. Human KJV-only reasoning suggest that the KJV is the word of God translated into English in a different sense than any other English Bible is the word of God translated into English.

Glenn Conjurske observed: "Most of the King James Only men have of late been shy of the word 'perfect,' but if they ascribe to the King James Version what practically amount to perfection, their scruples abut the word 'perfect' signify nothing" (Bible Version Controversy, p. 127).
KJVO ascribes to the KJV in English what we do to the Originals!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I believe you are allowing other people's prejudices to keep you from relying on Him in proving or disproving their ant-KJV claims. You should prove everything by Him. You will be facing Him one day & all the people of anti-KJVOnlyism is not going to be able to defend you for following the crowd.

2 Corinthians 5:9 Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him. 10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. 11 Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences.

I do not know all that KJVOnlyism represent but I am called to be a disciple of Jesus Christ, trusting Him to be my personal Good Shepherd to help me to follow Him, even discerning which Bible version keeps His words that proves they loved Him;

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. 24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me. KJV

John 15:20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. KJV

I cannot prove that for you. He has done it for me. Do you trust Jesus Christ as your personal Good Shepherd to do that for you?
Where have the Nas/Esv/Nkjv brought heresies into their translations? And do NOT say by not accepting 1 John 5:7 that means heresy!
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Since the arrest was made during the days of the unleavened bread which follows the day of Passover, it cannot be after that specific day of Passover. Since the origin of the word Easter was not Hebrew nor Greek origin, its meaning that the festival of the 7 days of unleavened bread to be in relations to the Passover day should not be missed.
The whole observance is called passover. Here's the proof, from your own KJV:
Ezekiel 45:21 21 In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten.
Those are God's own words to Zeke.



I know Who those verses are talking about. In fact if you compare the 2, your versions seems to want to give credit & the glory to God the Father through Jesus Christ rather than to Jesus Christ as God & Savior as the KJV has it. I am sure if you speak with those that deny the deity of Christ, that they would apply your version in that way.
In New Testament times, God The Father spoke to man thru God The Son, Jesus Christ. Omitting His name in that verse is selling Him short.



In any known manuscripts? Did you know that the phrase "Majority Greek Text" is not meaning ALL Greek manuscripts but a selected amount out of the many? Most of the Greek texts collated were from Eastern Orthodox that had a vested interests in changing the texts to combat Sabellianism for why there were not that many Book of 1 John among them as well as 1 John 5:7 written as is in the KJV.

Dr. Van Soden did not collate more than 400 out of the 5,000 Greek texts.
Both his & Hoskier's collection, among others, has been translated now. And KJVOs have searched for YEARS to find a ms. that supports those words-unsuccessfully.
Sorry, Sir; you're still batting zero.



Since hell is thrown in the lake of fire, then the lake of fire is the lake of fire. But if you were to be discerning, you would have done a word search to find this in the NIV of 2 Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness to be held for judgment;....NIV
The NIV is wrong there also. (I don't use it anyway.)

Now how can you be in hell awaiting the judgment as in the final judgment of being put in the lake of fire unless hell is a different holding area than the lake of fire?
EASY with a mistranslation!

So no matter how you do not like this, hell is hades & sheol. If contenders were making a big deal about hell, then why hades & sheol since they both are accepted as representing that same place? Since modern Bibles has hell written as a holding place before the final judgment, it is not a mistranslation, now is it?.

Here's proof from your KJV that JESUS called gehenna "hell...{Matt.23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Feel free to check out the Greek yourself!


Nothing in your list addresses the KJV as changing the message that can be taken out of context to support false doctrine by that changed message in that verse.
OTOH, I believe my answers, gleaned from nearly 40 years of working against the KJVO myth easily trump your responses.
 

Hark

Well-Known Member
Th

The KJVO myth is the false doctrine that the KJV is the ONLY valid English Bible translation, & that it's perfect.

I have posted the MAN-MADE ORIGIN of the current edition of that myth elsewhere in this "Bible Versions" forum. But NO believer of the KJVO myth can support that myth with SCRIPTURE from the KJV.(Or any other version)

Dr. Bob has posted an excellent rundown of the definitions of the KJVO myth in this forum at the beginning of it, in the "sticky posts" column.

Have you ever asked your self WHY some of the wording is changed in newer versions, besides getting rid of the archaic English? The MAIN reason is that some of the renderings are WRONG. For instance, "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is an outright GOOF. Newer versions replace it with the CORRECT rendering od "passover".

Now, while MVs have their own mistakes, the KJV is chock-full of them !

By your example of Easter is why you are in error. Proof?

Passover is a specific day which is followed by the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Acts 12:1Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. 2 And he killed James the brother of John with the sword. 3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) 4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. 5 Peter therefore was kept in prison: .......KJV

Now some KJVers try to explain that Herod was a heathen & not a Jew, but over 5o KJV translators & divided into 8 groups, all checked each others' work within that group & their works were checked by the other groups. The origin of the word from which Easter was derived from as also meaning passover, was not Hebrew origin nor Greek origin. but Chaldee origin. It was a foreign word that associated the 7 days of unleavened bread with the Passover even though that was not the Passover day itself. To avoid the confusion of how the Greek had adapted that word to mean passover also, because Passover had come & gone when it is the 7 days of the unleavened bread that is what Herod was waiting for to be over with. Easter was applied as meant by the Chaldee origin as referring to Passover as associated with it but not the Passover day since it was to be after the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Some modern Jews today associated the 7 days of unleavened bread as the Passover but scripture still separates the two events as maintained by other Jews. So I will stick with what the Bible says about the Passover day & Easter is just a foreign term used to associated the festival of the unleavened bread with the day of Passover, but yet not the Passover day itself.

In other words, Easter is not a term used as today in referring to the holiday called Easter nor to the pagan Easter. That term Easter is used in the Bible by associating the 7 days of the unleavened bread festivities with the day of the Passover.

If you cannot appreciate the KJV translators for clarity for how Easter is meant to be used as of the Chaldee origin, oh well.

I see you are avoiding the Romans 8:26 vs John 16:13 reproof for why I rely on the KJV for keeping the faith which is the good fight. Easter does nothing to to cause anyone to go astray other than to get believers to rely on other Bibles that actually support heresy.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The NIV of 2 Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness to be held for judgment;....NIV

Contenders should pray & lean on Him to prove everything taught for why they are anti-KJVOnlyism. Hell is used in modern Bibles and if angels are in chains in hell, awaiting their final judgment which has to be the lake of fire, then hell cannot be the lake of fire.

The NIV is wrong here, too. (I don't use it anyway.) A goof is a GOOF, regardless of which version(s) it's in.
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I believe you are allowing other people's prejudices to keep you from relying on Him in proving or disproving their ant-KJV claims.

Because you may believe it does not make it true. Believers can believe things that are not true.

Disagreeing with human, non-scriptural KJV-only opinions is not being anti-KJV. I have read the KJV over 50 years, and I attempt to present the truth concerning it. You seem to want others to follow your prejudices and opinions.

Do the Scriptures teach that the Lord Jesus Christ would lead believers to contradict the wisdom from God above by showing partiality to one exclusive group of imperfect Church of England critics in 1611 (James 3:17)?

Do the Scriptures give any one the authority to make an ex cathedra pronouncement as to which English translation is to be claimed to be authentic, true, or correct?
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Passover is a specific day which is followed by the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Some modern Jews today associated the 7 days of unleavened bread as the Passover but scripture still separates the two events as maintained by other Jews. .

According to the KJV itself, the word passover was also used for the seven days of unleavened bread.

Luke 22:1
Now the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover.

Ezekiel 45:21b
ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days
 

Hark

Well-Known Member
Where have the Nas/Esv/Nkjv brought heresies into their translations? And do NOT say by not accepting 1 John 5:7 that means heresy!

NAS & ESV brought heresy by testifying a lie that the Holy Spirit can utter groans when making intercessions in Romans 8:26 when John 16:13 says He cannot. The KJV & the NKJV a few other Bibles has kept the truth in His words in that the Holy Spirit cannot even utter His own groanings. Compare at this link;

Romans 8:26-27;John 16:13 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our - Bible Gateway

Modern tongue speakers believe tongues can be used for private use & it is often gained by a spirit coming over them alter in life which they assume was the Holy Spirit, but it was the spirit of the antichrist that John warned them abut in 1 John 4:1-6 as they will speak the same supernatural tongue the world speaks in as gibberish nonsense. These events seduces believers in chasing after them to receive another spirit by that sign of tongue ( Matthew 12:39 & 1 Timothy 4:1-2 & 1 Corinthians 14:20-22 & 1 Corinthians 14:32-33 )

Where the NKJV fails with the NASB & ESV is in 1 Corinthians 1:18 where "are being saved" is used by believers that err into thinking they are not saved yet but in the process of being saved whereas the KJV testifies they are saved.

1 Corinthians 1:18-21 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - For the preaching of the cross is to - Bible Gateway

That is why I prefer the KJV for the meat of His words whereas the Bible versions you refer to sow doubts in His words for why it is hard to correct believers that have gone astray in most modern bible versions. Granted, it is still on God to cause the increase in sing the KJV, but He has confirmed the KJV as the Bible that loved Him to keep His words so we can discern good & evil by His words.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
By your example of Easter is why you are in error. Proof?

Passover is a specific day which is followed by the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Acts 12:1Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. 2 And he killed James the brother of John with the sword. 3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) 4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. 5 Peter therefore was kept in prison: .......KJV

Now some KJVers try to explain that Herod was a heathen & not a Jew, but over 5o KJV translators & divided into 8 groups, all checked each others' work within that group & their works were checked by the other groups. The origin of the word from which Easter was derived from as also meaning passover, was not Hebrew origin nor Greek origin. but Chaldee origin. It was a foreign word that associated the 7 days of unleavened bread with the Passover even though that was not the Passover day itself. To avoid the confusion of how the Greek had adapted that word to mean passover also, because Passover had come & gone when it is the 7 days of the unleavened bread that is what Herod was waiting for to be over with. Easter was applied as meant by the Chaldee origin as referring to Passover as associated with it but not the Passover day since it was to be after the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Some modern Jews today associated the 7 days of unleavened bread as the Passover but scripture still separates the two events as maintained by other Jews. So I will stick with what the Bible says about the Passover day & Easter is just a foreign term used to associated the festival of the unleavened bread with the day of Passover, but yet not the Passover day itself.

In other words, Easter is not a term used as today in referring to the holiday called Easter nor to the pagan Easter. That term Easter is used in the Bible by associating the 7 days of the unleavened bread festivities with the day of the Passover.

If you cannot appreciate the KJV translators for clarity for how Easter is meant to be used as of the Chaldee origin, oh well.

I see you are avoiding the Romans 8:26 vs John 16:13 reproof for why I rely on the KJV for keeping the faith which is the good fight. Easter does nothing to to cause anyone to go astray other than to get believers to rely on other Bibles that actually support heresy.

With all due respect, Luke was writing about then-recent events he witnessed, & I assure you there was no Chaldean observance inviolved.
"Pascha" is the Greek word here. It appears in the NT Greek 29 times, & is properly translated 'passover 28 times. THERE'S NO REASON TO HAVE RENDERED IT AS 'EASTER' THAT ONE TIME! It's the same word JESUS used fpr passover. It's a transliteration of the Hebrew "p'sach", the word GOD THE FATHER used for 'passover' to Moses.

Herod worshipped the Roman pantheon of god's goddesses, His order from Caesar was to PLEASE the Jews to prevent rebellion. And he was familiar with their religion. Following a Chaldean fest would've DISpleased both the Jews & Romans, & Herod would've been in danger of losing his head.

Sorry, Sir, you pulled another "Casey At The Bat".
 

Hark

Well-Known Member
Your opinion is incorrect.

KJV-onlyism is really all about making exclusive, only claims for only one English Bible translation and about in effect trying to imply perfection or near perfection for that one imperfect English translation. Human KJV-only reasoning suggest that the KJV is the word of God translated into English in a different sense than any other English Bible is the word of God translated into English.

Glenn Conjurske observed: "Most of the King James Only men have of late been shy of the word 'perfect,' but if they ascribe to the King James Version what practically amount to perfection, their scruples abut the word 'perfect' signify nothing" (Bible Version Controversy, p. 127).

Address how Romans 8:26 is contrary to John 16:13 in most modern bibles as sowing doubts in His words for believers to think the Holy Spirit can utter groans from Himself thus He can use God's gift of tongues in turning it around to be gbberish nonsense in uttering His prayers when he cannot do even that according to the KJV.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
NAS & ESV brought heresy by testifying a lie that the Holy Spirit can utter groans when making intercessions in Romans 8:26 when John 16:13 says He cannot. The KJV & the NKJV a few other Bibles has kept the truth in His words in that the Holy Spirit cannot even utter His own groanings. Compare at this link;

Romans 8:26-27;John 16:13 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our - Bible Gateway

Modern tongue speakers believe tongues can be used for private use & it is often gained by a spirit coming over them alter in life which they assume was the Holy Spirit, but it was the spirit of the antichrist that John warned them abut in 1 John 4:1-6 as they will speak the same supernatural tongue the world speaks in as gibberish nonsense. These events seduces believers in chasing after them to receive another spirit by that sign of tongue ( Matthew 12:39 & 1 Timothy 4:1-2 & 1 Corinthians 14:20-22 & 1 Corinthians 14:32-33 )

Where the NKJV fails with the NASB & ESV is in 1 Corinthians 1:18 where "are being saved" is used by believers that err into thinking they are not saved yet but in the process of being saved whereas the KJV testifies they are saved.

1 Corinthians 1:18-21 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - For the preaching of the cross is to - Bible Gateway

That is why I prefer the KJV for the meat of His words whereas the Bible versions you refer to sow doubts in His words for why it is hard to correct believers that have gone astray in most modern bible versions. Granted, it is still on God to cause the increase in sing the KJV, but He has confirmed the KJV as the Bible that loved Him to keep His words so we can discern good & evil by His words.

Sir, many evangelists have put up posters reading "Many ARE BEING SAVED at each night's service!" And almost all those evangelists were true Christians.

Some of your "meat" came from a buzzard. It's a matter of semantics.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
NAS & ESV brought heresy by testifying a lie that the Holy Spirit can utter groans when making intercessions in Romans 8:26 when John 16:13 says He cannot. The KJV & the NKJV a few other Bibles has kept the truth in His words in that the Holy Spirit cannot even utter His own groanings. Compare at this link;

Romans 8:26-27;John 16:13 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our - Bible Gateway

Modern tongue speakers believe tongues can be used for private use & it is often gained by a spirit coming over them alter in life which they assume was the Holy Spirit, but it was the spirit of the antichrist that John warned them abut in 1 John 4:1-6 as they will speak the same supernatural tongue the world speaks in as gibberish nonsense. These events seduces believers in chasing after them to receive another spirit by that sign of tongue ( Matthew 12:39 & 1 Timothy 4:1-2 & 1 Corinthians 14:20-22 & 1 Corinthians 14:32-33 )

Where the NKJV fails with the NASB & ESV is in 1 Corinthians 1:18 where "are being saved" is used by believers that err into thinking they are not saved yet but in the process of being saved whereas the KJV testifies they are saved.

1 Corinthians 1:18-21 KJV;NASB;ESV;NKJV - For the preaching of the cross is to - Bible Gateway

That is why I prefer the KJV for the meat of His words whereas the Bible versions you refer to sow doubts in His words for why it is hard to correct believers that have gone astray in most modern bible versions. Granted, it is still on God to cause the increase in sing the KJV, but He has confirmed the KJV as the Bible that loved Him to keep His words so we can discern good & evil by His words.
The most popular version for decades has been the Niv, by your own logic God must be blessing that version as has been so used by Him?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Address how Romans 8:26 is contrary to John 16:13 in most modern bibles as sowing doubts in His words for believers to think the Holy Spirit can utter groans from Himself thus He can use God's gift of tongues in turning it around to be gbberish nonsense in uttering His prayers when he cannot do even that according to the KJV.
The translation would be correct, but those who make groans to be tongues being used are wrongly understanding it!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Address how Romans 8:26 is contrary to John 16:13 in most modern bibles as sowing doubts in His words for believers to think the Holy Spirit can utter groans from Himself thus He can use God's gift of tongues in turning it around to be gbberish nonsense in uttering His prayers when he cannot do even that according to the KJV.
Do you hold that real salvation can only happen when Kjv is used and read and preached?
 

Hark

Well-Known Member
The whole observance is called passover. Here's the proof, from your own KJV:
Ezekiel 45:21 21 In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten.
.

I can say that the Passover is designated as the 14th day of the first month followed by the 7 days of unleavened bread. Leviticus 23:5 Numbers 9:5 & Joshua 5:10 & 2 Chronicles 35:1 are confirmations as to that specific day.

However.. Luke 22:1 & Luke 22:7 does associate the first day of the unleavened bread as the Passover for when the Passover must be killed.

Still, the word Greek pascha "of Chaldee origin (compare pecach 6453); the Passover (the meal, the day, the festival or the special sacrifices connected with it):--Easter, Passover. in comparing to pecach "from 'pacach' (6452); a pretermission, i.e. exemption; used only techically of the Jewish Passover (the festival or the victim):--passover (offering)."

I see that the Greek use of the term Passover is associating the 7 days of the unleavened bread with that specific day of Passover as given the example in Luke. What is confusing is that after the Passover are the 7 days of the unleavened bread.

Leviticus 23:5 In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the Lord's passover. 6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the Lord: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. KJV

Since Luke also had written the Book of Acts, Luke seems to be combining the 7 days of the unleavened bread with the Passover. I could understand why the KJV translators switched out Easter for Passover in Acts 12:4, in respect to the O.T. but why is Luke blurring the Passover with the 7 days of the unleavened bread that follows it? Could it be from being in occupied Israel? Could the Jewish people have been influenced to call the first day of Passover also as the first day of the 7 days of unleavened bread in spite of scripture designating the very next day as the first day of the 7 days of unleavened bread? Sort of like the non-Jews were the ones that associated Passover with the 7 days of the unleavened bread & evil communications corrupt good manners ( 1 Corinthians 15:33 ) whereby the Jews began associating Passover as the first day of unleavened bread when really, it started the next day.

Seems like the KJV translators should have gone with "after the 7 days of the unleavened bread" rather than passover or Easter just to be clear in Acts 12:4 but that is how Luke had written in the Greek.

I am not moved to see Easter as an error but He shall help me to defer from what many are claiming it to be the Holiday Easter as if that is what Acts 12:4 was referring to but just being a term meaning after the 7 days of the unleavened bread.
 
Top