Zaac
Well-Known Member
We might ask you the same question regarding this post.
I'm not pulling for a voter id law so there's no need to ask me.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
We might ask you the same question regarding this post.
"Discriminatory"? Discriminating against who? Democrats?
Seems to me, *any* 90-year-old with an expired driver's license is going to be denied the opportunity, regardless of their race, sexual orientation, etc. So where's the discrimination?
"Discriminatory"? Discriminating against who? Democrats?
Seems to me, *any* 90-year-old with an expired driver's license is going to be denied the opportunity, regardless of their race, sexual orientation, etc. So where's the discrimination?
The discrimination is against the people fighting voter fraud. That's all this is. Democrats know they cannot get what they want done honestly. Look no further than Obamacare for proof.
You said it. Stop trying to say you didn't. Doesn't matter what you said on other posts. I used your own words. Your words give us the impression congresspeople deserve better than us.
If someones elderly mother can wait in line to vote she can wait in line to get a legitimate ID.
If someones elderly mother can wait in line to vote she can wait in line to get a legitimate ID.
No, you're campaigning against a perfectly valid expectation, that people presenting themselves to vote really are who they claim to be. Why?I'm not pulling for a voter id law so there's no need to ask me.
The discrimination is against the people fighting voter fraud. That's all this is. Democrats know they cannot get what they want done honestly. Look no further than Obamacare for proof.
Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
If they do not vote for that reason - well they dont deserve to have their vote counted....If more Republicans show up to vote on election day because they've got the requisite ID, exit polling will show them winning and probably discourage other Dems from even bothering to vote. ...
Where I vote they would allow such a person to go to the head of the line.
Voter fraud is a Republican myth. The Bush administration tried to find it and could not.
If they do not vote for that reason - well they dont deserve to have their vote counted.
(for this reason, I would like to see seniorty [ of the same class] to be based on % of votes recieved)
Why? Lets say I been waiting in line for an hour - why should someone be allowed to cut in front of me- who just walked in.
Now, if a notiation was made - let them sit until their number comes up! Works at the meat counter at the grocery store.
No, you're campaigning against a perfectly valid expectation, that people presenting themselves to vote really are who they claim to be. Why?
Actually, the IRS was quite involved in a massive effort to suppress voter turnout on the conservative side. Lois Lerner resigned over it.
Even us Libertarians know that.
Why? Lets say I been waiting in line for an hour - why should someone be allowed to cut in front of me- who just walked in.
Now, if a notiation was made - let them sit until their number comes up! Works at the meat counter at the grocery store.
I see you provide no links, no evidence. Still a myth until proven otherwise.
If you are right why didn't the Bush administration find anything after 5 years of investigations?
If you're going to deny Lois Lerner resigned behind a conservative targeting scandal, then you are a liar. Go ahead and report me.