• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The eternal purpose of Christ pt2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
PreachTony

(You can try to say that Election only works one way, but that simply cannot be in the case of a sovereign God as Calvinism describes Him. )

Go to the confession of faith 1689 version.....take the chapter on the decree, then work through it line by line.....show where it is wrong.....then give your SCRIPTURES ALONE explanation of election and the decree.


(If God has selected to save those He saves, then He must also have selected to punish those He punishes. )
Why do you believe He must have to do this?


(Man has no says so in either case, )
Was man present before the world was and if he was...was man going to dictate to God what me must do as you are suggesting?
 

Protestant

Well-Known Member
Would God give to the unsaved the faith to heal, the faith to do miracles?................You make no sense.

Yes. The Lord does give the unsaved the power to work miracles.

If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,

2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;

3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
(Deut. 13:1-3)
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
PreachTony

(You can try to say that Election only works one way, but that simply cannot be in the case of a sovereign God as Calvinism describes Him. )

Go to the confession of faith 1689 version.....take the chapter on the decree, then work through it line by line.....show where it is wrong.....then give your SCRIPTURES ALONE explanation of election and the decree.


(If God has selected to save those He saves, then He must also have selected to punish those He punishes. )
Why do you believe He must have to do this?


(Man has no says so in either case, )
Was man present before the world was and if he was...was man going to dictate to God what me must do as you are suggesting?

First I will state that I can't say that I am not a Calvinist, however I will say I am an electionist. Ultra Monogenesis.

To my knowledge it is not stated anywhere in the Word, that anyone is predestined to the lake of fire.

However this is stated. Eph. 1:4,5 According as he (God the Father) hath chosen us in him (Lord Jesus Christ) before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

Now verse 9 states that God the Father has made known something to those who were, "predestined," concerning something which he had purposed in himself.

Verse 10
That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him ([self], I guess):

I would like your thoughts on verse 10 relative to the un-predestined.

Some other things to consider would be verses such as Phil 2:10,11 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Rev 22:1,2,17 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb. In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.


See also thread; Every Knee Shall Bow in Gen Baptist Dis, forum
 
Last edited by a moderator:

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Jews killed the Gift.

How much clearer must Scripture be before you realize Christ is the gift no unregenerate wants?

And therein lies the error of Calvinism. There was no regeneration prior to the death, burial and glorification of Jesus Christ (John 7). And as we know, not all Jews wanted Jesus crucified.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Brother DHK,

A simple question for you, are Psalm 5:5 and 11:5 true? Yes or no. (I would agree with you that verse you cited in Chronicles is true).


Of course they are true. In this context.

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with:

YLT : For, if we have become planted together to the likeness of his death, so also we shall be of the rising again; Rom 6:5
For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh. 2 Cor 4:11
But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. Rom 8:11
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I answered your post, but I don't see response to it.
Here is a part of it:

Your post really was not worth a response from me, mon ami. All we get from you are deflections and obfuscation.

God isn't angry with the wicked at all. Not according to that verse. Do some more study.

Then who is He angry with? His anger, His wrath was poured out on His Son. Let that settle in your theology.

As for Heb.12:29, I am amazed someone like yourself would even consider it.
You (Calvinists) seem to pull a phrase here and a phrase there.
Here a phrase, there a phrase,
Everywhere a phrase, phrase.

He is a 'consuming fire' taking vengence upon all the wicked. Look at the day of Judgment. God loves everybody, says you guys, and then casts those He loves into everlasting torment. Now, that is love exemplified.

Icon starts it out with a disjointed "God is angry with the wicked every day," half of one verse without a reference.
Now it is added to with "God is a consuming fire," a disjoint from verse 28 of Hebrews 12. Just keep stringing them together without ever looking at the context.

Sin is either punished in the sinner or Sinbearer. His wrath is meted out on one or the other. If God is not angry with the wicked, then who is He angry with?

Yes, I was the one who first used 1Chron.
1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.
--Why? Because it has about as much relevance and meaning to the verses you guys keep pulling out of context. Without context there is no real meaning.
God is not angry with the wicked every day. That is not what the verse even means. Study it out.

Start a thread about that verse and quit harping on about it. Quit deflecting.

As far as Heb.12:29,
First, it gives the impression that you view God more like the Muslims view Allah--not as a God of love, but as aloof, impersonal, of Judgment, Almighty, and ready to condemn. There is no mercy here. He is a consuming fire. You have indeed neglected the context and ignored who God really is. It is atrocious how you depict the nature of God on this thread.

We view God, One who hates, abhors sin. He hated, abhorred it so much, He, in His holiness, killed His own Son. God is love, yes. But His love is centered on Christ, you know, the One He killed on the cross?

Heb 12:28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:
Heb 12:29 For our God is a consuming fire.
--The author is using the first person plural "we" indicating himself. He, as a believer is speaking of the Kingdom. Let us have grace whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear.
God is a loving God. We are to serve him out of grace in reverential and godly fear or respect--not half-hazardly.

The "consuming fire" is a metaphor, just like Jesus is "the door," the "vine," etc.
W. MacDonald says:

Without the Spirit, none will, none can truly hear Him, mon ami. None will reverence Him.

Let us go to another passage that deals with God's anger, seeing Psalms is something not worthy of debating due to prayer or poetical language.


David sang to the Lord the words of this song when the Lord delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul. He said: “The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation. He is my stronghold, my refuge and my savior—from violent people you save me. “I called to the Lord, who is worthy of praise, and have been saved from my enemies. The waves of death swirled about me; the torrents of destruction overwhelmed me.The cords of the grave coiled around me; the snares of death confronted me. “In my distress I called to the Lord; I called out to my God. From his temple he heard my voice; my cry came to his ears. The earth trembled and quaked, the foundations of the heavens shook; they trembled because he was angry. Smoke rose from his nostrils; consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it. He parted the heavens and came down; dark clouds were under his feet. He mounted the cherubim and flew; he soared on the wings of the wind. He made darkness his canopy around him—the dark rain clouds of the sky. Out of the brightness of his presence bolts of lightning blazed forth.The Lord thundered from heaven; the voice of the Most High resounded. He shot his arrows and scattered the enemy, with great bolts of lightning he routed them. The valleys of the sea were exposed and the foundations of the earth laid bare at the rebuke of the Lord, at the blast of breath from his nostrils.[2 Sam. 22:1-16]

This is the Spirit's way of conveying God's wrath as He poured it out upon David's enemies. But God is not angry with the wicked? Really?


It is a simple metaphor in that the author is speaking to believers that as we worship the Lord it should be with great reverential fear or respect. Respect is the proper modern word.

All are required, all are commanded to reverence Him. None are without an excuse.

But the Calvinist of today whips this KJV word out of context and makes it seem as God is an angry old man ready to condemn all in sight. Pitiful!

No, it is your rubbishness in your theology that you state God is not angry with sinners every day. Is God angry with Satan somedays and other days they play 'pattycake'?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Protestant

Well-Known Member
That does not say that God is angry with him all the time.

Yes, it does. As long as the sinner remains in unbelief.

It means that as long as he does not believe on him there is a sentence of judgment upon him.

Yes. That judgment flows from His hatred for both the sin and the sinner.

God loves him with an intense love, and is constantly pleading with him to come to him.

His wrath does not flow from His love.

If it did, language would have no meaning.

If wrath could be construed as love, then Hell might as well be construed as yet another example of His intense love.

Just think. You too had that sentence of judgment upon you, until you believed.

Yes. I was an enemy of the Gospel who bore His holy wrath.

But regarding the election I was one day, unbeknownst to me, to be accepted in the beloved, as a recipient of His mercy and compassion.
 

Protestant

Well-Known Member
They go directly contrary to the nature of God who expressly is stated as "God is love," (the absence of hate).

This is the kind of theology preached by the LBGT, same - sex marriage crowd.

What is missing from this equation is 'God is holy.'

And His holiness will not allow sin to go unpunished.

Yes, God is love.

He loves holiness and righteousness and justice.

This is why He will judge the reprobate in holiness, righteousness and justice when He casts them all into the Lake of Fire.
 

Protestant

Well-Known Member
Though it is not a caricature, why should I stop? The truth of your theology is that God has Elected a number, great though it may be, to salvation and likewise elected a number, greater than the first, to eternal damnation. You can try to say that Election only works one way, but that simply cannot be in the case of a sovereign God as Calvinism describes Him. If God has selected to save those He saves, then He must also have selected to punish those He punishes. Man has no says so in either case, according to you, so man is nothing more than a puppet. I hate using that cliche, but it is apt, given the theology.

Yes, the number and identity of the Elect has been determined according to the eternal purpose of God in Christ.

And yes, the number and identity of the Reprobate has been determined according to the eternal purpose of God outside of Christ.

Is not inconceivable that God had purposes in mind before He set His creation in motion?

Is it not inconceivable that God's purposes always come to pass?

And is it not inconceivable that God is not obligated to give man what he does not deserve: saving grace?

And is it not inconceivable that man willingly rejects Christ, the truth of Christ and the Gospel without any divine prompting by God?

Do not the works of Adam and the nation of Israel prove that without the powerful intervention of God's grace, all men are doomed?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
This is the kind of theology preached by the LBGT, same - sex marriage crowd.

What is missing from this equation is 'God is holy.'

And His holiness will not allow sin to go unpunished.

Yes, God is love.

He loves holiness and righteousness and justice.

This is why He will judge the reprobate in holiness, righteousness and justice when He casts them all into the Lake of Fire.
This is not worthy of an answer.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is not worthy of an answer.

Protestant hit the nail on the head. It is not worthy of an answer because you have not one that is worthy of a biblical refutation.


These images are as deplorable as they come, yet these people say God loves everyone, including those who abuse their bodies by being with the same-sex.
[edited due to offensiveness]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Your post really was not worth a response from me, mon ami. All we get from you are deflections and obfuscation.
I answered directly point by point. And now you accuse me of deflecting, etc.
Perhaps you were just unable to refute my post. That is more likely the case.

Then who is He angry with? His anger, His wrath was poured out on His Son. Let that settle in your theology.
Psalm 7:11 does not say that God is angry with anyone!
Only the KJV says that.
(ASV) God is a righteous judge, Yea, a God that hath indignation every day.

(Darby) God is a righteous judge, and a *God who is indignant all the day.

(ESV) God is a righteous judge, and a God who feels indignation every day.

(Geneva) God iudgeth the righteous, and him that contemneth God euery day.

(YLT) God is a righteous judge, And He is not angry at all times.
--It is quite evident that the KJV is wrong in its translation in this case.

Look carefully at your own Bible:
(KJV) God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day.
--The words "with the wicked" are in italics indicating they are not in the Hebrew text. They are supplied by the translators to make sense to you, the reader. They are not there. That is why all these other translations do not include them. They are not in the text. You cannot say from this verse that God is angry with the wicked every day, for "with the wicked" is not even found in this verse.
That is why I suggested to you: Do Some More Study On This Verse!

He is a 'consuming fire' taking vengence upon all the wicked. Look at the day of Judgment. God loves everybody, says you guys, and then casts those He loves into everlasting torment. Now, that is love exemplified.
How do you come to this conclusion? I supplied for you the context. Again do some more study.
If you truly believe what you just posted it is a denial of eternal security, and a denial of the P in TULIP.
Hebrews 12:28,29 is addressed to those in Christ, Christians, not unbelievers. How are Christians in danger of everlasting torment unless you believe they can lose their salvation? It is not speaking of vengeance of upon all the wicked. It is a metaphor used for Christians. Do some study here. The writer uses the first person plural "we". Do you believe the writers of the NT are unsaved??
Sin is either punished in the sinner or Sinbearer. His wrath is meted out on one or the other. If God is not angry with the wicked, then who is He angry with?
When the High Priest sent the goat out on the Day of Atonement was he angry? Was it an act of anger? No. Neither is God an angry God. The Bible does not say that. If you need to go to a different translation, then please do. But the Word of God does not picture God as an angry God. He doesn't lose his cool.
As the High Priest without emotion, lay his hands on that goat, and sent it out into the wilderness, so God, without being angry, will execute wrath/judgment/justice upon those that have not believed on the name of His only begotten Son. He does not have to be an "angry God" to do so. And this is what you depict.
Start a thread about that verse and quit harping on about it. Quit deflecting.
It is not a deflection. I make a point about people taking Scripture out of context. You have done it again by trying to apply Heb.12:29 to unbelievers when it says nothing of the kind. It has as much relevance to the unsaved and their salvation as does 1Chron.26:18. None. Good verse eh?
We view God, One who hates, abhors sin. He hated, abhorred it so much, He, in His holiness, killed His own Son. God is love, yes. But His love is centered on Christ, you know, the One He killed on the cross?
So you view God as Calvin did, as depicted in His Institutes. I am not impressed. I view Him as the Bible depicts Him. He is not an angry God.
He is a God of love, mercy, compassion, holy, just and righteous.
He loved mankind so much that he came from the glories of heaven and lived and died and rose again that he might redeem man from his sin.

Without the Spirit, none will, none can truly hear Him, mon ami. None will reverence Him.
This is where you are wrong. This is taking the Calvinistic principle of Total Inability too far. The Bible does not teach this. It does teach the principle of the depravity of man, that all men are sinners. But that doesn't mean that all men cannot respond to God.
When God commanded all men to:
Repent.
Seek the Lord.
Believe on His Name.
Call upon Him, etc.

God did not put any caveats to those commands. He didn't tell them to wait for the Spirit first. They are universal commands to be obeyed whether or not the Spirit had opened their hearts. This is what the Calvinist has wrong. Cornelius was not regenerated nor could he have been until he heard the gospel from Peter. And yet he was able to call upon the Lord to ask someone to show him the way.

Rahab the harlot no doubt was the same way. She heard of the miracles of Jehovah, that God was doing through Moses in Egypt. She heard of the other defeated kings in the travels of Israel. When she believed, called upon the name of Jehovah, we are not told. It is not the Spirit that "opened her heart," it is her, putting her faith in Jehovah, according to the revelation of God that was revealed unto her.
Let us go to another passage that deals with God's anger, seeing Psalms is something not worthy of debating due to prayer or poetical language.
Depends on the context. Remember that it is poetical language. Poetical language often has difficulties of interpretation due to the nature of the literature--often figurative.


David sang to the Lord the words of this song when the Lord delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul. He said: “The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation. He is my stronghold, my refuge and my savior—from violent people you save me. “I called to the Lord, who is worthy of praise, and have been saved from my enemies. The waves of death swirled about me; the torrents of destruction overwhelmed me.The cords of the grave coiled around me; the snares of death confronted me. “In my distress I called to the Lord; I called out to my God. From his temple he heard my voice; my cry came to his ears. The earth trembled and quaked, the foundations of the heavens shook; they trembled because he was angry. Smoke rose from his nostrils; consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it. He parted the heavens and came down; dark clouds were under his feet. He mounted the cherubim and flew; he soared on the wings of the wind. He made darkness his canopy around him—the dark rain clouds of the sky. Out of the brightness of his presence bolts of lightning blazed forth.The Lord thundered from heaven; the voice of the Most High resounded. He shot his arrows and scattered the enemy, with great bolts of lightning he routed them. The valleys of the sea were exposed and the foundations of the earth laid bare at the rebuke of the Lord, at the blast of breath from his nostrils.[2 Sam. 22:1-16]
The entire piece is very poetic. He uses very figurative language that describes his glory as much as his judgment.
It is Psalm 18:1-50.
It describes David and his wars with the Philistines.
It is also a Messianic Psalm depicting Christ warring with the hosts of hell.

It contains much imagery and figurative language.

This is the Spirit's way of conveying God's wrath as He poured it out upon David's enemies. But God is not angry with the wicked? Really?
No, not there. You have it wrong.

All are required, all are commanded to reverence Him. None are without an excuse.
It doesn't matter if Satan and his demons are commanded to reverence him. That is not the point. That is not what the verse says. The verse is directed only to believers. Your interpretation is simple eisegesis. With that method you can make the Bible say anything you want to make it.

For example:
Zechariah 5:1 Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll.
--My interpretation--Zechariah saw a spaceship flying through the air. :D
But you are doing the same type of thing.
No, it is your rubbishness in your theology that you state God is not angry with sinners every day. Is God angry with Satan somedays and other days they play 'pattycake'?
It doesn't say God is angry. However it does teach that God is just; he metes out his justice; his judgement, and will do so on the ungodly and their sinfulness. They will be judged. I don't believe you have the correct interpretation of these verses, and are not taking the context into consideration.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Protestant hit the nail on the head. It is not worthy of an answer because you have not one that is worthy of a biblical refutation.


These images are as deplorable as they come, yet these people say God loves everyone, including those who abuse their bodies by being with the same-sex.
[edited due to offensiveness]

Yes, God loves them, as God loved Matthew or Levi, the most despised man of his day--a publican or tax collector. There wasn't a social class that he didn't love.
He loved the man in 1Cor.5:1-5--a man committing incest, and yet he was saved. Christ died for him too.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, God loves them, as God loved Matthew or Levi, the most despised man of his day--a publican or tax collector. There wasn't a social class that he didn't love.
He loved the man in 1Cor.5:1-5--a man committing incest, and yet he was saved. Christ died for him too.

God hates sin. God also hates those who commit sin. The only reason His wrath was not poured out on us was because He poured it out on His Son, you know, the One He loves.


Now, please answer this.

Was God angry at Jesus when He killed Him on the cross? Was His wrath poured out on His Son on the cross? If yes, then is He not angry?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
God hates sin. God also hates those who commit sin. The only reason His wrath was not poured out on us was because He poured it out on His Son, you know, the One He loves.


Now, please answer this.

Was God angry at Jesus when He killed Him on the cross? Was His wrath poured out on His Son on the cross? If yes, then is He not angry?
Yes God hates sin. It is a false conclusion to draw that he hates those that commit sin.
God poured out his wrath upon his Son, true.
Was God angry? No. God was not angry.
Was his wrath poured out? His wrath was appeased with the death of his son.

1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hebrews 12:29 is a reference from Deut. 4:24. Now, I will give you some verses from Deut. 4 to show you what 'consuming fire' means...

You saw with your own eyes what the Lord did at Baal Peor. The Lord your God destroyed from among you everyone who followed the Baal of Peor.[Deut. 4:3] Now the Hebrew word for 'destroyed' means annihilate, exterminate, devastate, destroy. Can God do this while not in anger?

The Lord was angry with me because of you, and he solemnly swore that I would not cross the Jordan and enter the good land the Lord your God is giving you as your inheritance. I will die in this land; I will not cross the Jordan; but you are about to cross over and take possession of that good land. [vss. 21,22]

Here is an example of sin not going unpunished. God commanded Moses to guide His people, and held him personally responsible for their wrongdoings. Moses did not do what they did(yes he smote the rock twice), yet God held him accountable for their sins. Sound famaliar? Christ was held responsible for His sheep's sin. He suffered, paid for their sins in death.

Be careful not to forget the covenant of the Lord your God that he made with you; do not make for yourselves an idol in the form of anything the Lord your God has forbidden. For the Lord your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God.[vss. 23,24]

This is the context of what is meant by the Hebrew writer's meaning of God being a 'consuming fire'. He was angry at the Jews for having other gods, other idols they worshipped, and not Him. That was why the Hebrew writer also wrote So I declared on oath in my anger, ‘They shall never enter my rest.’[Heb. 3:11] These Jews were in unbelief, worshipping other idols and God, in His anger, swore 'They shall never enter my rest(sabbath)'.

Sinners are serving sin and self, not worshipping God. Unless God has mercy, His wrath is never rescended, going all the way to Him casting them into the lake of fire.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes God hates sin. It is a false conclusion to draw that he hates those that commit sin.
God poured out his wrath upon his Son, true.
Was God angry? No. God was not angry.
Was his wrath poured out? His wrath was appeased with the death of his son.

1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

He killed someone and was not angry? That is one schizophrenic God you are displaying on here. He killed someone, yet was not angry.

Propitiation in the greek meant 'an appeasing, an propitiation'. Christ's atoning sacrifice appeased God's wrath, God's anger. Appease means pacify or placate (someone) by acceding to their demands, relieve or satisfy (a demand or a feeling). Now let us see what pacify means quell the anger, agitation, or excitement of bring peace to (a country or warring factions), especially by the use or threatened use of military force. And now the meaning of placate make (someone) less angry or hostile. If Christ had never came in the flesh, God's anger, God's wrath would be poured out on everybody who ever lived. But praise God, He sent Jesus to bear my sins, that God's wrath, God's vengence, God's wrath was poured out on His Son.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top