NO president will get the SC pick though on their last year, as that is traditional! As the Congress always waits on the incoming President president for that!
I doubt you'd say the same if Trump got an opening a few years from now.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
NO president will get the SC pick though on their last year, as that is traditional! As the Congress always waits on the incoming President president for that!
I doubt you'd say the same if Trump got an opening a few years from now.
Just was saying that was NOT the first time an outgoing president had his SC pick stopped until the election of new president!I doubt you'd say the same if Trump got an opening a few years from now.
Just was saying that was NOT the first time an outgoing president had his SC pick stopped until the election of new president!
Yes, both sides would do the same thing!And I'm just saying it's purely political. Any justification from "tradition" or anything else is window dressing. The reality is that the GOP had the votes to keep the seat open, so they did. If they had a GOP President, they'd have had no problem confirming a nominee in the final year. Same goes for the Democrats.
This is simply not true. It may be true from this point on, but the claims made at the time - and constantly revised to deal with the historical facts that refuted those claims - were/are false.NO president will get the SC pick though on their last year, as that is traditional! As the Congress always waits on the incoming President president for that!
And that's wrong. It is counterproductive to a government working for the good of the people.Yes, both sides would do the same thing!
No your good, it's just that people tend to forget there are a substantial amount of people that are tired of being the first pawns to be sacrificed for someone else's political agenda. It gets tedious.
Some Gov't employees still have to report to work, and are not paid until they are given their back-pay. It can be an extremely stressful situation.which is why it is so dumb to furlough govt workers - they will get the money anyways - which amounts to free time off.
But as UT also stated - it is a hardship when the money does not show up in your checking account.
Now if they were to "furlough" welfare payments........
The Dems are out of touch. Trump still isn't a very good President.
Can you define a "good President" ?
Washington/Lincoln/Reagan, can point them out...Can you define a "good President" ?
Not in a thread about the border wall. (Stay on topic.)
Did you start this thread?
No, I didn't think so.
Did you make a comment about a "good President"?
No, I didn't think so.
Are you the site police who dictates what questions one can ask another?
If not, how about you scroll on by what one member asks of another that doesn't interest you!
Washington/Lincoln/Reagan, can point them out...