Everyone knows those whose pride prohibits admitting error. Perhaps they do not have deep flaws in their character, but only their outward expressions are deeply flawed as indicated by posts too numerous to count.Horse Feathers.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Everyone knows those whose pride prohibits admitting error. Perhaps they do not have deep flaws in their character, but only their outward expressions are deeply flawed as indicated by posts too numerous to count.Horse Feathers.
Who made you the judge?Everyone knows those whose pride prohibits admitting error. Perhaps they do not have deep flaws in their character, but only their outward expressions are deeply flawed as indicated by posts too numerous to count.
When a person changes "deeply flawed" to "deep flaws" and then does not fess up, they are wrong. And I should not have to explain the obvious to anyone who is committed to truth. Someone said, even a dog knows the difference from being accidentally stepped on and being kicked.Who made you the judge?
MB
So everyone is wrong but youWhen a person changes "deeply flawed" to "deep flaws" and then does not fess up, they are wrong. And I should not have to explain the obvious to anyone who is committed to truth. Someone said, even a dog knows the difference from being accidentally stepped on and being kicked.
Once again you make up flaws and attribute them to others. Your behavior reveals your heart according to scripture...So everyone is wrong but you
MB
Do you know what the expression "You're full of baloney" means? You haven't shown any "deep flaws" in the KJV, and I don't believe you nor anyone else here will mistake me for a KJVO. Every Bible translation has a few goofs in it, and while the KJV is an outdated "Model T" version, it's still a valid version, same as the outdated Model T is still a street-legal car.Everyone knows those whose pride prohibits admitting error. Perhaps they do not have deep flaws in their character, but only their outward expressions are deeply flawed as indicated by posts too numerous to count.
Yet another denial of the obvious and a pathetic effort to hide your false witness. You again claim I claimed the KJV had deep flaws. Did I say the KJV does not have "a few goofs?" Nope It has dozens of them. So if you take the original goofs then add the outdated word choices, you get a deeply flawed translation. Anyone who denies the obvious is "full of baloney."Do you know what the expression "You're full of baloney" means? You haven't shown any "deep flaws" in the KJV, and I don't believe you nor anyone else here will mistake me for a KJVO. Every Bible translation has a few goofs in it, and while the KJV is an outdated "Model T" version, it's still a valid version, same as the outdated Model T is still a street-legal car.
Van, your 'translation' is deeply flawed. First of all there is no such word as unimpairment. That's just silly of you. It's as absurd as saying "He gave him uncrippledness." You could have put it plainly as "restored him to complete health" or "gave him complete health" or "gave him perfect health."And how should it read?
Based on faith in His name, the man,
whom you see and know, has been strengthened.
Faith in His name, through Him, gave him
unimpairment in the presence of all of you.
.
. Every Bible translation has a few goofs in it,.
You are just saying what you have heard someone else say and now you enjoy hearing yourself say it. You have no clue what you are talking about.
The Latin Vulgate was old testament.
Perhaps you may be describing many KJV-only advocates who repeat what they have heard someone else say or what they read in some KJV-only book or on some KJV-only website.
KJV-only advocates show that they believe assertions that are not true, some concerning the KJV and some concerning other English Bible translations.
Blindly believing assertions that are not true would not suggest that KJV-only advocates know what they are talking about in repeating those unproven claims.
Incorrect. The Latin Vulgate included both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
The 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament was translated from an edition of the Latin Vulgate's New Testament as printed in the 1500's.
You don't know what you are talking about when you claim the KJV is flawed. I should ask in what and where. I think most people realize that anything man touches is not perfect. You're not perfect either and the NKJV is just an imitation of the Word of God and has just as many flaws as does the KJV.. You haven't shown any errors that make any theological difference. Your just looking to argue about nothing.When a person changes "deeply flawed" to "deep flaws" and then does not fess up, they are wrong. And I should not have to explain the obvious to anyone who is committed to truth. Someone said, even a dog knows the difference from being accidentally stepped on and being kicked.
I wouldn't go that far Van. Look at your self. You certainly aren't perfect. You have no peace we can all see that with your insulting everyone .Everyone knows those whose pride prohibits admitting error. Perhaps they do not have deep flaws in their character, but only their outward expressions are deeply flawed as indicated by posts too numerous to count.
I agree. When someone makes a charge that a translation, in this case the KJV, is 'deeply flawed' there has to be a doctrinal or theological deviation. There is no doctrinal or theological aberration within the text of the KJV. So he can rattle on all he wants about inconsequential things, but his vaunted claims amount to hot air.You haven't shown any errors that make any theological difference. Your just looking to argue about nothing.
MB
I do know the KJV is the most accurate and this is stated by most experts who claim to know.
MB.