SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Note the poster ignores Titus and 2 Peter as the only ones without exception.
When you know what you are talking about come back
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Note the poster ignores Titus and 2 Peter as the only ones without exception.
You can always tell when a fraud has been exposed by the shift to mindless assertions of expertise.When you know what you are talking about come back
It does not apply. And it seem you do not know why. And I cannot explain it to you. You figure it out and explain it us.Sharp's "Rule" fails here! Matthew 17:1, “τον πετρον και ιακωβον και ιωαννην”
this might help you, Ancient Greek grammar - Wikipedia
It does not apply. And it seem you do not know why. And I cannot explain it to you. You figure it out and explain it us.
Wow.Sharp's "Rule" fails here! Matthew 17:1, “τον πετρον και ιακωβον και ιωαννην”
and here...
Romans 1:7, “ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ”
1 Corinthians 1:3, “ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ”
2 Corinthians 1:2, “ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ”
Galatians 1:3, “ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοϋ Χριστοῦ”
And in Patristic Greek
Polycarp Martydom 22 (about 155 AD), “δόζα τώ θεώ καί πατρί καί άγίω πνεύματι…ω ή δόξα σύν τώ πατρί καϊ άγίω πνεύματι εις ούς αιώνας τών αιώνων, αμήν”
At last you are not an expert on the Greek spoken by Christ.BA born again!
I've already proven you are no expert on the Greek Language.You have said that I don't know. Now you have to prove me wrong
At last you are not an expert on the Greek spoken by Christ.
MB
I've already proven you are no expert on the Greek Language.
MB
I've already proven you are no expert on the Greek Language.
MB
How? You are suppose to know more than I do. And I have little doubt you do. I understand few things, you at times tell me I am in err. Yes, there are things I known I do not know. But the few truths I know, I know. If I think it to be important, I might say something.You have said that I don't know. Now you ha ve to prove me wrong
How? You are suppose to know more than I do. And I have little doubt you do. I understand few things, you at times tell me I am in err. Yes, there are things I known I do not know. But the few truths I know, I know. If I think it to be important, I might say something.
Based upon what Winer, someone who denied the trinity held?Yeah, I saw this, Wallace is wrong.
Based upon what Winer, someone who denied the trinity held?
Think main point of DR Wallace is that since Winer got Sharp rule wrong, people just assumed he was right!Winer may have denied the Holy Trinity. But as Dr A T Robertson said was one of best Greek grammarians. He is better than most today
Think main point of DR Wallace is that since Winer got Sharp rule wrong, people just assumed he was right!
Dr Wallace recognized as being one of the very best today!Winer may have denied the Holy Trinity. But as Dr A T Robertson said was one of best Greek grammarians. He is better than most today
Not wrong when his rule is properly applied.....I have seen myself that Sharp is wrong. Even Robertson and Middleton query Sharp on another passage!