The "actual Bible"? What other Bible is there Bob? You are the one using EWG sources. Not me.==============================
By contrast "the actual Bible says" -
Of course. The OT is always in agreement with the NT. Who said otherwise.Dan 7:10
Thousands upon thousands were attending Him,
And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him;
The court sat,
And the books were opened.
This is in complete harmony with the way that John describes judgment in the NT - based on things written in the books of heaven.
Your interpretation is not in agreement; it is in agreement with EGW, not with the Bible. There is the difference. There is no "investigation" being spoken of in Daniel. The "books were opened," and that is all. Don't read more into the passage than that which is being said.
As I challenged you, why don't you actually take what I said and refute it, instead of copying and pasting the same thing over and over again.
Rev 20:12
- New American Standard Bible
And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds.- King James Version
And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
- Holman Christian Standard Bible
I also saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life, and the dead were judged according to their works by what was written in the books.
- New King James Version
And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.
- No one disputes the veracity of these verses Bob, only your interpretation of them.
Matthew 11:23 And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.
24 But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.
--The day of judgment in verse 24 is the same day of judgment referred to in Revelation 20. How will it be more tolerable in the Lake of Fire for those of the land of Sodom than those of the land of Capernaum? There are degrees of punishment, obviously.
Capernaum saw the very works of Jesus; Sodom, though a wicked city did not see the works of Jesus. Had they seen the works of Jesus they would have repented. Therefore their punishment will not be as great as it will be for the people of Capernaum.
This is the teaching of Christ. It is according to their works. There is no investigation. Jesus already knows this from the foundation of the world. He is God.
I said this:You cannot add a nonsensical argument as the response to the Bible texts above that refute your claim above.
Why keep doing that?
Who is supposed to be snookered by such a response?
Deal with the Bible details listed and quit "circling b ack to J.W.'s" as if the J.W. rant will be your escape for every Bible challenge to your man-made traditions.
In answer to your question: Why do I keep quoting the Bible and keep explaining it, and then asking why you can't refute it? Because you don't. You don't give an intelligent answer for the posts and Scripture that I give you. You don't even try. Talk about Bible details; you avoid them completely. I go through the passage verse by verse. You avoid the explanations completely. You act like a J.W. and jump to other "details," that you would rather discuss "circling your wagons around the details" you can't refute. Why is that Bob?It doesn't refute what I have already explained to you. But you didn't touch that/couldn't touch that. You can't actually refute the Bible itself can you Bob.
Yes, they do. You should give some Biblical ones. Quoting the same verse in five or so different translations isn't "giving details." It is showing the board your excellent ability to copy and paste.Details matter.
No, I expounded the Scriptures, explained them for you. Now you say I am the one making up things. Making up things is trying to fit the scripture into the dark ages. That is pure nonsense. Neither Daniel nor John were speaking of the Dark Ages, and you can't prove that they were. You are just "making up things." Fanciful, imaginative, fairy-tales.I just did - you simply made stuff up in direct contradiction to scripture - then I post the scripture showing your contradiction of it.