As the father sent Jesus, Jesus sent the Holy Spirit?interesting..do you mind expanding on this a bit? thanks
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
As the father sent Jesus, Jesus sent the Holy Spirit?interesting..do you mind expanding on this a bit? thanks
They do not capitalize Him though, so would they be seeing him as a god, like Jesus is to them?Good point, also calling the Holy Spirit "him", and not "it" here.
Eternal Subordination is a big error being held and taught even among really good authors!The "subordination" only applies to the time that Christ was on earth. It is not within the Godhead as the Deity of each Person. This is an impossibility
They do not capitalize Him though, so would they be seeing him as a god, like Jesus is to them?
Just curious as to why they agreed to translate in that fashion?If you read what I have said, grammatically the KJV is quite right, with the words being neuter in gender. But both Biblically and theologically, this reading is incorrect.
Eternal Subordination is a big error being held and taught even among really good authors!
Just curious as to why they agreed to translate in that fashion?
Just curious as to why they agreed to translate in that fashion?
This truth is not at issue.The Bible teaches that the Father is Yahweh; that Jesus Christ is Yahweh. and the Holy Spirit is Yahweh.
As the one and the same God. But yet distinct Persons.So, regardless of the terms "Father", and "Son" and the Father "sending" the Son, etc, they are still 100% COEQUAL.
This truth is not at issue.
As the one and the same God. But yet distinct Persons.
The Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit being the One Yahweh were always the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit. In that they have never changed.
Would not each person of the trinity be self existent from eternity?as is eternal generation of Jesus from the Father, which is heresy from the pit of hell!
Wonder how long they will keep it there before 'editing" it?Look at Isaiah 9:6 in their NWT, Jesus is there called "Mighty God", both in capitals!
before the Incarnation, was he not Jesus, but the eternal Word of the father?In the Old Testament, Jesus Christ is called "malakh YHWH", that is "The Messenger of Yahweh", Who is also called Yahweh Himself. I am of the belief that Sonship is Incarnational and not always, even though it is mentioned in the OT, it is done in Prophecy.
Hebrews 1:5, "And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?" and Psalm 2:7, "I will proclaim the decree spoken to Me by the LORD: "You are My Son; today I have become Your Father.". Both speaking of the Incarnation and not an eternal thing.
Eternal subordination only applies if the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit were and always the three distinct Persons but never being any suborudination in being the One Yehwah.Eternal Subordination is a big error being held and taught even among really good authors!
I think the point is though that Jesus did not "need" the father in order to also be God!Eternal subordination only applies if the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit were and always the three distinct Persons but never being any suborudination in being the One Yehwah.
All appearances of Yehwah is the Son ( per John 1:18). Yes, both Hebrews 1:5 and Psalms 2:7 refer to the resurrected incatnate Son (Acts of the Apostles 13:33, Romans 1:4).In the Old Testament, Jesus Christ is called "malakh YHWH", that is "The Messenger of Yahweh", Who is also called Yahweh Himself. I am of the belief that Sonship is Incarnational and not always, even though it is mentioned in the OT, it is done in Prophecy.
Hebrews 1:5, "And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?" and Psalm 2:7, "I will proclaim the decree spoken to Me by the LORD: "You are My Son; today I have become Your Father.". Both speaking of the Incarnation and not an eternal thing.
So is that your way of denying the eternaly of the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit to have always to be so in the Trinity? There are Christians who believe that began with the incarnation.I think the point is though that Jesus did not "need" the father in order to also be God!
All appearances of Yehwah is the Son ( per John 1:18). Yes, both Hebrews 1:5 and Psalms 2:7 refer to the resurrected incatnate Son (Acts of the Apostles 13:33, Romans 1:4).
before the Incarnation, was he not Jesus, but the eternal Word of the father?