So admit it, it's a favorite issue to debate.
Being called a "dispy" in another thread sure brought back the old days, and it made me think, well, there's nothing for it but to start another thread examining the Rapture and when it is going to take place.
So I will just state that the Pre-Tribulational Rapture is the only view that leaves Scripture intact (meaning we don't have to spiritualize Scripture away) and doesn't leave one trying to work out the problems that a Mid or Post view creates. As far as those who do not embrace that the Rapture is taught in Scripture, you are welcome as well, but it's going to be a little hard to take you seriously.
As an introductory presentation I would like to draw your attention first to the subject of Resurrection, and one of the arguments presented by Post-Trib brethren: "the Rapture cannot take place prior to the end of the Tribulation because the "First Resurrection doesn't take place until the end of the Tribulation."
Revelation 20:1-6 King James Version
1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
Is this the first resurrection?
Not at all. In a context of sequence the First Resurrection (unto life) is the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The second is the Pre-tribulation Rapture (and hopefully you will understand this before this thread expires).
The third?
Revelation 11 King James Version
3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.
8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
9 And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.
10 And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth.
11 And after three days and an half the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.
12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.
Kind of hard for the first Resurrection of Revelation 20 to the first one in a context of sequence, isn't it?
Particularly when the Two Witnesses are raptured right smack dab in the middle of the Tribulation (and for those who do not embrace a seven year Seventieth Week, please see Daniel 12 where there are 75 days added to the 3 1/2 year period that begins with the abomination of desolation, which itself begins at the end of the 3 1/2 year ministry of the Two Witnesses).
The word "first" found in verses 5 and 6 is translated from the word
prōtos. Strong's Concordance states:
prōtos, pro'-tos; contracted superlative of G4253; foremost (in time, place, order or importance):—before, beginning, best, chief(-est), first (of all), former.
It is used in contexts involving sequence, and it is used in contexts involving rank. A few examples of a context of rank (all verses KJV):
Matthew 20:27
And whosoever will be
chief (G4413) among you, let him be your servant:
Mark 6:21
And when a convenient day was come, that Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, high captains, and
chief (G4413) estates of Galilee;
Mark 12:30
And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the
first (G4413) commandment.
Luke 15:22
But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the
best (G4413) robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
The Lord made the statement, "But many that are first (G4413) shall be last; and the last shall be first (G4413)." Here we see both sequence and rank. Those that came first (sequentially) will be last (in terms of rank), and those that are last (sequentially) shall be first (in terms of rank). So too, in Revelation 20, there is no need to demand a context of sequence to first, but to see that it is the type of resurrection that is indicated. To put it into easily understandable terms, the "first resurrection" is the resurrection of life, and "the second resurrection" is the resurrection unto damnation. The first resurrection is contrasted with the Second Death. Again, the "first resurrection" in terms of sequence is none other than the Resurrection of Jesus Christ:
Acts 26:22-23 King James Version (KJV)
22 Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:
23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be
the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.
Daniel 12 taught of a resurrection:
Daniel 12:1-2 King James Version
12 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
When the rich young ruler asked how he could obtain eternal life, this is likely what was key in his thoughts.
So, as a first argument, I suggest that denying a Pre-Trib Rapture based on "the first resurrection" of Revelation 20 isn't going to work. The Tribulation Martyrs that are raised in the first resurerction could be glorified, but it's equally possible—since there will be an extended lifespan among men in that Age (Isaiah 65:20)—that they will simply live long lives as they did when God first created the earth. The Regeneration Christ spoke of here in this passage...
Matthew 19:28
And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the
regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
... will fulfill the Prophecy spoken of in the Old Testament among God's promises of restoration of the Nation of Israel.
So whether there is a Rapture concerning the Tribulation Martyrs is not something I would be overly dogmatic about. I lean towards the view that they are glorified at this time. But if they aren't there is nothing that keeps them from simply living long lives.
So that is just a beginning to a discussion about the Rapture. In the course of the discussion I think some will be surprised at some of the passages that must be considered to come to a reasonable conclusion on this most wonderful source of hope for the believer.
God bless