It doesn't unless one uses a flawed hermeneutic.Break it down for me how does it deny it?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It doesn't unless one uses a flawed hermeneutic.Break it down for me how does it deny it?
I would hardly call those equivalent comparisons.This passage doesn't teach a physical removal of believers. This would serve no purpose. Jesus prayed "I do not ask You to take them out of the word, but to keep them from the Evil One" (John 17:15). Christ compared His return with the days of Noah, where the unrighteous were taken away, and the righteous went through the flood but were saved.
Not so The second coming involves Christ coming to Earth the rapture does not. He sends His angles to gather us and we meet Him in the air.This is before the tribulation and Christ can return at any time there is no sign for His return.The second coming is Christ's appearing, Hebrews 9:27; Titus 2:13. Matthew 24:29-31. 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. 1 Corinthians 15:52. Revelation 20:6.
Break it down for me how does it deny it?
The argument I am making, Jesus remains at the right hand of God as mediator until His second appearing (Hebrews 9:28, Hebrews 9:24, Hebrews 9:12). When He leaves being at the right hand of God whether at a pre trib appearing or in 70 A.D. He would not be once for all at the Holies per Hebrews 9:12 till Hebrews 9:28. And 9:28 would not be a second appearing (Titus 2:13; Matthew 24:30). It would be a third of sorts.Break it down for me how does it deny it?
That is the pre-trib interpretation. At issue is Christ's appearing, Titus 2:13; Hebrews 9:28; Matthew 24:30.The second coming involves Christ coming to Earth the rapture does not.
May make no sense to you, but scripture is plain, Jesus will descend from heaven, and we will meet Him Of couse he will set foot on the ground, He WILL DESCEND.We meet the Lord in the air. It would make no sense to meet Him there if the rapture were the second coming after the second coming Christ will be on earth. In the rapture Christ never sets foot on the ground. The rapture and the second coming are two separate events.
MB
I stopped believing in the Rapture years ago, and have understood both passages to support that view. However, I value your opinion, and would like your take on those passages.I would hardly call those equivalent comparisons.
Please tell me where in scripture does it say Christ will descend to the earth.May make no sense to you, but scripture is plain, Jesus will descend from heaven, and we will meet Him Of couse he will set foot on the ground, He WILL DESCEND.
The argument I am making, Jesus remains at the right hand of God as mediator until His second appearing (Hebrews 9:28, Hebrews 9:24, Hebrews 9:12). When He leaves being at the right hand of God whether at a pre trib appearing or in 70 A.D. He would not be once for all at the Holies per Hebrews 9:12 till Hebrews 9:28. And 9:28 would not be a second appearing (Titus 2:13; Matthew 24:30). It would be a third of sorts.
There can be more than one last day i.e. the last day of the week, the last day of the month, the last day of the year, century, millennia, etc...The Rapture happens after the resurrection. Which happens on the last day
The rapture;
“For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.” (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17)
“Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.” (1 Corinthians 15:51–53)
But it happens after the resurrection. Which happens on the last day
“Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” (John 5:28–29)
“And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.” (John 6:39)
“so man lies down and does not rise; until the heavens are no more, they will not awake nor arise from their sleep.” (Job 14:12) (NET)
Why would Jesus not remain at the right hand of God until His second appearing? (Per Hebrews 9:12; Hebrews 9:24; Hebrews 9:28)No it wouldnt
You are wrong. The rapture and the second coming are two different events.The second coming is Christ's appearing, Hebrews 9:27; Titus 2:13. Matthew 24:29-31. 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. 1 Corinthians 15:52. Revelation 20:6.
Why would Jesus not remain at the right hand of God until His second appearing? (Per Hebrews 9:12; Hebrews 9:24; Hebrews 9:28)
Descend doesn't always mean a complete descent.May make no sense to you, but scripture is plain, Jesus will descend from heaven, and we will meet Him Of couse he will set foot on the ground, He WILL DESCEND.
Give one example of me using a verse which does not say what I claim it means. Just one.You have a history of using verses that dont say what you claim they say much like the ones quoted here. Also the rapture cannot be counted as a coming since He never steps foot on the ground.
1 Thessalonians 4:17 refers to the rapture, ". . . shall be caught up . . . ." And you are claiming that 1 Thessalonians 4:16 is not the Lord's second appearing (Hebrews 9:28).You are wrong. The rapture and the second coming are two different events.
MB
Give one example of me using a verse which does not say what I claim it means. Just one.