johnp. said:what's IOW mean?
john.
In Other Words :thumbs:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
johnp. said:what's IOW mean?
john.
No, it does ALWAYS mean sinners. Reread what I said again.Jarthur001 said:Indeed. So you now agree that did not always use the word world to mean all mankind each and every time?
But...as things would have it, I believe God so loved the world also. You see we do this every day and think nothing about it. But when it comes to God, many want to limit Him. God loves the world, but not each man. Just as I love food, but hate peas. Both statements are true.
1Jo 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for [the sins of] the whole world.
God loving men is contingent on you loving vegetables? :laugh:God loves the world, but not each man. Just as I love food, but hate peas. Both statements are true.
Agreed as well.
And until you received Christ you were in the world partaking of all the nature the world is, including the wrath of God.
Why do you say that? What I meant was that you were not including those who have been forgiven since the world is never a description of the saved.So there are men that are sinless??
I do exclude the redeemed ONCE SAVED.
2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world. Jews and Gentiles.Actually scripture states He died for the sins of the WHOLE world as seen here:...ALL sinners.
So, if I'm understanding you right; God loves the world (all sinners)...
...but God does not love all men (who are sinners). That makes no sense.
Well, we are to remember as well as do, but this is beside the point of the OP.
God hates sins...
Like I said to James, your son hates brussel sprouts. What does he hate about them?
when I say I hate peas, I mean I hate peas.webdog said:God loving men is contingent on you loving vegetables? :laugh:
Do you really hate peas...or dislike their taste? Do you hate the health benefits peas offer...or just the taste? Do you hate the shape and color...or just the taste? Sounds like there is one element of the peas you "hate"...the taste. I don't think you really hate round little quarter inch green balls, or consuming something that will keep you healthy and strong. Same rings true with us. God hates sins, but loves the rest.
when I say I hate peas, I mean I hate peas.
I don't think you really hate round little quarter inch green balls, or consuming something that will keep you healthy and strong.
Yes, and as an object OF wrath, you were under that jurisdiction until you were changed in nature by God through faith. For until then the wrath of God abode on you as says the scriptures.johnp. said:Although we would be under the jurisdiction of the law we could never receive the wrath of God because we were loved. We were, in the eternal purposes of God, slated for salvation. Eph 2:3 ...Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath. But we were to have our nature changed. Wrath cannot come to the elect but only love and correction.
Jhn 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
Of course. Can you include and exmember of Mcdonalds as part of the present crew. No. And you can not equate the saved with the world from which they have been removed. World means all sinners.Why do you say that? What I meant was that you were not including those who have been forgiven since the world is never a description of the saved.
I have not contended world means ALL MEN but it means ALL Sinners in context of peopleSo what was the previous about? So you say that the 'world' here means all sinners not all men. Answer the question please.![]()
This is the whole point of our discussion. Since world DOES mean Sinners your understanding of some points in scripture must be re-evaluted because they do not line up biblically. And your view on atonement if off as well. The Jewish priest made atonement for the sins of ALL of Israel (without many's permission) but not everyone's sins were atoned for in that atonement offering. Only those who accepted its atoning work in their lives (believed/recieved) were atoned for. The rest of that blood shed for the atonement was poured out at the base of the alter to be trampled under foot.2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world. Jews and Gentiles.Look what an atoning sacrifice does man. Atoning sacrifice atones. Nothing else is needed if one's sins are atoned for. All one's sins are dealt with by an atoning sacrifice whether you witness the sacrifice or not. It is given not received. The whole of Israel did not need to be there in Jerusalem to benefit from the atonement, it covered the whole nation. Don't view the atonement as a thing to seek out but as a thing decided by another concerning who benefits from it and who doesn't. With the blood of Christ the atonement is a one off and needs nothing else to see the atoned one atoned and righteous, holy and pure in God's sight. The world? Jesus never asked me if I wanted atoning, He just went ahead and did it anyway. I am no longer considered or viewed as guilty because Jesus died for my sins without my permission.
![]()
Again your understanding of atonement is inaccurate, flawed, or amiss - take your pick.If Christ was the propitiation for the whole of the race then the whole are saved.
That is right. Christ made the way for men to come to God so that the wrath of God against them would not first destroy them. This is why scripture speaks to:propitiation : to appease or placate (an angry or insulted person or god )
And Christ did that didn't He? He placated the Angry God for us and if He placated the Angry God for us then the Angry God cannot be angry anymore and if He did that for all then God would not be angry anymore with any of us because Jesus placated Him on our behalf.
IF Christ completely reconsiled the world to God then why does Paul beseech or beg them TO BE reconsiled. Becuase though it is set forth it must accepted!2Cr 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
2Cr 5:20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech [you] by us: we pray [you] in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.
No, that is what you are discussing. I am discussing what the bible says concerning the "world". And it means sinners.We are talking about a God that either creates men for Hell or His love, which He defined, fails.
He fails at nothing, and if He loves the "world" sinner, whom Christ came save, and of whom He is the propitation of the WHOLE world (all the world) - then I guess you have some things to figure out.In discussing the word 'world' we must also discuss 'love'. He loved the world. There is no soft shoe shuffle man.
Which is it: God loved the entire race and His loves fails or He did not love everyone and His word and His love stay intact?
Allan said:And your view on atonement if off as well. The Jewish priest made atonement for the sins of ALL of Israel (without many's permission) but not everyone's sins were atoned for in that atonement offering. Only those who accepted its atoning work in their lives (believed/recieved) were atoned for. The rest of that blood shed for the atonement was poured out at the base of the alter to be trampled under foot.
I didn't say it harmed anything James.Jarthur001 said:Allan,
Please share how you think this harms Calvinism? I would see it as great support. The blood of the atonement was given for only Gods people, and not the whole world.
Then you will fully see and understand why Calvinist see it as they do. God loves his people and dies for them and them only...and not the world. Not that you agree, but i'm sure you see the reasoning. As to those in Israel that did not believe. The picture in the OT was just that..a picture. The blood of animals can never work and take away sin. This taking of blood of animals happend each year, but only once as in the case of Christ. In fact, the saving power of the OT was not in the blood seen at that moment, but in the blood to come on the cross. So the saving power found in the OT is nothing other then the faith placed in the spotless Lamb of the NT. Yet to those it is applied remains the same. The atonement was to His people and His people only.Allan said:I didn't say it harmed anything James.
But regarding the above and its difference with Calvinism is that Atonement is made on behalf of everyone (in my example ALL of Israel - Gods people but not all of Gods people were saved). Yet it only atones for those who will receive that atoning work done by priest. Those who will not beleive/recieve that work done are left without hope.
It is called Universal Atonement but is also Specific Redeption.
Not me but Scirpture does not agree with your position on that (regarding ONLY).Jarthur001 said:Then you will fully see and understand why Calvinist see it as they do. God loves his people and dies for them and them only...and not the world. Not that you agree,
No, the atonement was for the Whole NATION of Israel (All of Gods people), not some special portion within those ranks. Yet we know all of the Nation was not saved because they did not receive that atonement offered for them all. Scirpture does not state it otherwise. It is infatic the sacrifice is for whole nation, whole assembly, all Israel...As to those in Israel that did not believe. The picture in the OT was just that..a picture. The blood of animals can never work and take away sin. This taking of blood of animals happend each year, but only once as in the case of Christ. In fact, the saving power of the OT was not in the blood seen at that moment, but in the blood to come on the cross. So the saving power found in the OT is nothing other then the faith placed in the spotless Lamb of the NT. Yet to those it is applied remains the same. The atonement was to His people and His people only.
Were you a sheep before you were saved? If so this would mean you were already a child of God. Scripture says we are Children of God by faith;johnp. said:How can it be that the Good Shepherd failed to find the lost sheep? By being a Poor Shepherd by any chance MB?
LK 15:3 Then Jesus told them this parable: 4 "Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? 5 And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders 6 and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbors together and says, `Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.' 7 I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.
Matt 1:21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
1 Peter 2:8 ...They stumble because they disobey the message--which is also what they were destined for.
john.
ok..Not me but Scirpture does not agree with your position on that (regarding ONLY).
Yes...I believe this is what I said. The whole nationNo, the atonement was for the Whole NATION of Israel (All of Gods people), not some special portion within those ranks.
Indeed...non were saved because of this. right?Yet we know all of the Nation was not saved because they did not receive that atonement offered for them all.
As I stated. Yet this was not the other nations, now was it? Just appied to His people...His nation.Scirpture does not state it otherwise. It is infatic the sacrifice is for whole nation, whole assembly, all Israel...
Indeed..as I have stated. What about Egypt? Was the atonement for Egypt?Scripture states it was given for the Whole congregation...for all the people...for Israel,
Verse please.ext... Atonement for them all and yet all did not receive because they would not believe.
Where as the OT atonement was only a picture, Christ work was the real thing. It was finished after the cross.Jesus is the that same atoning sacrifice made on behalf of the 'Whole World' and not ours (believers) only.
So now you want to renege on what you said about John 6?'World' means sinners, it always has and always shall.
Jhn 6:32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.
Jhn 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.
Allan..
It does not say that the world is born again,
First, to whom was Jesus speaking and were THEY all believers?
Notice something interesting here though. Verse 32:
I believe you speak of 2 cor 5. Lets look at the verses. One line at a time in order.Just as God was in Christ reconciling the "world" to himself but Paul beseeches (pleads or begs) THEM to be reconciled TO God.
8And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
19To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
So then you would agree the atonement is applied to ALL Gods people, but in the OT is a picture of the NT where it too is applied to ALL Gods people..AND...it is understood that the OT picture never did work.....and.....it is also understood that the NT worked. In both cases it was not applied to Egypt...a picture of the world in the OT. right?BTW - of course the animal blood didn't save but was a looking forward to Christ Himself (receiving by faith that which God promised to them who obey). Have I ever contended otherwise, no.
What does it matter? God has His own reasons, He doesn't ask our opinion as to the "benefits" or lack thereof of anything He does.In the context that you used it, it would mean "the lost sinful World"...However what benifit is the BLOOD and death of Jesus Christ to those that GOD will/does NOT save by HIS GRACE?
No, that is what you are discussing. I am discussing what the bible says concerning the "world". And it means sinners.
I am discussing what the bible says concerning the "world". And it means sinners.
He fails at nothing, and if He loves the "world" sinner, whom Christ came save, and of whom He is the propitation of the WHOLE world (all the world) - then I guess you have some things to figure out.
HankD said:What does it matter? God has His own reasons, He doesn't ask our opinion as to the "benefits" or lack thereof of anything He does.
He "bought" even those who willingly deny Him:
2 Peter 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
If one "needs" to know the benefit:
Proverbs 16:4 The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
RE:
1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
John himself defines "the whole world" later in his epistle:
1 John 5:19 And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.
So, the propitiation (satisfaction) for sin was made for the whole world(which lies in the wicked one (literally)), believers and non-believers, so that the whole world can have no excuse and every mouth will be stopped in that day.
Not only was satisfaction made for the world but the Holy Spirit is sent to the whole world (believers and non-believers):
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;
Indeed it takes an unattainable (humanly speaking) spiritual ability to believe on Christ and the divine conviction of sin is the only means of making the unbeliever potentially desire to be saved. without both the satisfaction for sin having been made (from the foundation of the world) and the conviction of sin provided in the present moment, no one could even hope to be saved.
Again, no one will have the excuse "I wasn't given a fair chance".
And again, we hear that it doesn't make sense that if Christ died for all men, some, many, most will go to hell (or words to that effect).
But, isn't that for God to decide what makes sense?
Isaiah 55
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
He does what He pleases even if it upsets us (yes, me as well-of course).
Psalm 115:3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.
There is another parameter:
Genesis 18:25c ... Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?
HankD