BobRyan
Well-Known Member
You have been using this circular reasoning ad nauseam. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, it is still a fallacious argument. You refuse to acknowledge God's foreknowledge is the result of His absolute decree as to the infallible futurition of things. Instead you have taught the Most High God to be subservient to and taught by sinful, wicked, God-hating man's will.
According to your theology, God not only knows who will believe, but, by default, must also know those who will not believe. Those who will not believe have eternal damnation as their reward.
Since, according to your theology God loves all men -- yet God foreknows how all men will respond to the Gospel -- to what purpose are the men brought into the world whom God foreknew would reject Christ resulting in His throwing them into eternal Hellfire?
Was it to teach them a lesson they will never forget?
1. Jude says that we can witness eternal fire -- the punishment of eternal fire by looking at the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Instructive because no one over there is still burning.
2. What purpose? The Calvinist argument fails to answer that question starting with Lucifer's fall. "What purpose in allowing him to live on"?" And with the fall of Adam "What purpose in not sending Christ immediately". And the book of Job "What purpose in allow discussion in that meeting and the torment of Job"?? and the Cross "What purpose in allowing Romans to do any tormenting because no text says the wages of sin is Romans tormenting you" and the resurrection "What purpose in not having the second coming immediately after the resurrection of Christ".
Calvinism fails on all the "for what purpose" questions.
And the Arminian POV has the answer.
Right decisions in an Arminian system are motivated by compelling evidence - as we see in the book of Job.
Calvinism has no place for any of it.
In fact Calvinism appeals in all cases to the capricious arbitrary nature of its view of God to solve these puzzles.
in Christ,
Bob