They are referring to two different elections, one corporate before creation and one individual after creation.
Besides your conjectures and inferences and imagination for that distinction what is the explicit Biblical evidence there are two different kinds of elections both of which are found in context of personal and individual salvation as is the case with Ephesians 1:4-11; 1 Thes. 1:4-5; 2 Thes. 2:13-14???? Proof please?
To be chosen from the beginning precludes being chosen before the beginning. The election has to be after the beginning.
First, notice the differences. In one text it simply says that before the foundation of the world this election took place (Eph. 1:4). However, 2 Thessalonians 2:13 says nothing about any "foundation" or any "world" but says merely "from the beginning." The beginning of what? FROM THE BEGINNING OF GOD'S ELECTIVE CHOICE when the Father, Son and Holy Spirit made an "everlasting covenant" (Heb. 13:20).
However, one thing is for certain, this elective choice preceded the birth of any of God's elect from Genesis to revelation and thus is not based upon anything after the beginning found in their existence.
Thanks for accepting the election of 2 Thessalonians 2:13 was for salvation.
Election is always in regard to salvation - always! It is never found in scripture unto damnation.
The ordinary use of the Greek preposition "eis" when its object is found in the accusative case (2 Thes. 2:13) is one of terminating action.
I am saying the "how" were we chosen is by being set apart in Christ,
Wrong! "in Christ" identifies the SPHERE of election not "how" they were elected. The "how" is repeatedly defined by the prepositional phrases "according to".
and I am saying the basis of the election is God crediting our faith as righteousness.
What you are saying is that election has its basis in foreseen faith when you say "election is God crediting our faith as righteousness." Also, you are confusing justification with election. Justification "is God crediting our faith as righteousness (Rom. 4:3,6).
Election does not have its basis in "our faith" but is the cause of our faith "through sanctification of the 4-65Spirit AND belief of the truth." Faith or coming to Christ is the consequence not the cause of being given to Christ by the Father in election (Jn. 6:37,39, 44-45; 65).
You are reversing cause and effects as election is the basis that we "might be sanctified" not because we are sanctified and holy before him (Eph. 1:4b). You are teaching that election is based upon foreseen good when that is precisely what Paul denies concerning the purpose of God according to election (Rom. 9:11).
Yes, the corporate election before creation was not conditioned on foreseeing individuals, but rather the target group for redemption was seen as those Christ would redeem. Thus when Christ was chosen before creation to be the lamb, those that would be redeemed by the lamb were also chosen corporately.
There is no corporate election any more than there is any corporate damnation. The choice unto salvation was personal and individual and based upon God's purpose of Grace. One must be "created in Christ" personally and indivdually in addition to be chosen "in him" - Eph. 1:4; 2:10.
Individual election for salvation is personal and individual. So the corporate election of Ephesians 1:4 is not personal or individual, but individual and personal election for salvation fits perfectly with all of Paul's writings.
Ephesians 1:13-14 proves that election in Christ is personal and individual. The Father chose (Eph. 1:4-6); the Son redeemed (Eph. 1:7-8) and the Holy Spirit applied that redemption personally and individually.
Reading lesson: No one said there is a corporate salvation. Calvinism is defended by misrepresenting the views of others.
Reading lesson, election in all contexts mentioned is directly associated with personal and individual salvation as its consequence. Look at 1 Thes. 1:4-5. Verse 4 tells individuals they can know if they are one of God's elect. Verse 5 tells individuals how they can know they are God's elect. 2 Thes. 2:13-14 is election in direct relationship to personal and individual sanctification by the Spirit AND belief of the truth. Ephesians 1:4 is election that obtains sanctification (holy) and ultimate glorification (blameless) before him. You cannot have a corporate election without corporate salvation as election is indisputably presented as the cause of salvation in each context.
1. "that ye might be" - holy and blameless - Eph. 1:4
2. "knowing....your election of God. FOR... - 1 Thes. 1:4-5
3. "to (Gr. eis) salvation through.... 2 Thes. 2:13
Lets go over Romans 8 yet again for the millionth time.
My friend "we" have never gone over it even once!
Did God formulate a plan of redemption before creation? Yes. As part of that plan did God choose His Redeemer, His Lamb of God before creation? Yes. Did God's plan include His redeemer redeeming INDIVIDUALS FOR SALVATION? Yes When God implements this plan of redemption is it according to His foreknowledge. Yes. Did His plan including resurrecting those chosen? Yes. Thus all those individually chosen were predestined to be adopted as son!
Deal with the language instead of philosophizing and paraphrasing your own ideology! This plan did not merely include salvation but Paul says "ALL THINGS WORK TOGETHER" and they work together because God is working them "ACCORDING TO HIS PURPOSE" - v. 28
The identify of the repeated "those" in verse 29-30 are "the elect" in verse 32. This election is eternal, individual and personal and that is indisputably proven by the context. This is the mechanics of election to salvation.
1. ALL THINGS WORK according to His Purpose
2. Thus the elect are forenown to salvation according to that purpose
3. Thus the elect are predestinated according to that purpose
4. Thus the elect are called, justified and glorified according to that purpose.
Next lets talk about John 6. How are individuals given to Christ? The Holy Spirit puts them in Christ. Thus everyone give:n to Christ for salvation arrives in Christ. No mention of "coming to faith" so yet another reading lesson. And yes, once an individual is put in Christ, Christ shall in no way cast out. At least we agree on that part.
Enough philosophical and rationalization! Stick to the scriptures. The whole context from John 6:29 to John 6:70 is about the nature of faith and the metaphors for believing in Christ. Coming, eating, drinking are all metaphors used for believing in Christ. Just read the context and that should be obvious if you read it without bias.
Nothing is said here in this text about the work of the Holy Spirit but rather the work of the Father. They come to Christ because they are given to Christ by the father (v. 37) they are not given to Christ because they come but that is exactly what you are erroneously teaching here.
This is a matter of common misunderstanding. When do you suppose names are written in the Lamb's book of life, when they are chosen or before they are chosen? When they are chosen. So when are they written, or not written? FROM the foundation of the world, not before the foundation of the world. So individual election for salvation occurs after creation.
Talk about a misunderstanding! Their names are written in the lamb's book of life when the everlasting covenant of redemption (Heb. 13:20; Eph. 1:4-12) occurred between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Hence, their names were written "before the foundation of the world" and "from the beginning" of election.
Agreed, but we are talking about God deciding who will be a child of God based on God crediting an individuals faith in the truth as righteousness.
No such thing in scripture! You are confusing Justification with election. Justification is God accrediting righteousness on the basis of faith while election is giving some to the Son in order that they will come to Christ in faith (Jn. 6:36 with verse 37).
No one was supernaturally born anew before Christ paid the ransom.
Another common ignorance of Scripture. So Jesus was just flapping his lips to Nicodemus BEFORE the cross - Jn. 3:3-5 and then rebuking him for not understanding this basic elementary truth of salvation (v. 9)??? The new birth in the Old Testament is called circumcison of the heart. You just as well deny saints prior to the cross could be justified as that is based upon the blood of Christ as much as regeneration (Rom. 4:1-23; Acts 10:43). You simply don't understand that God applied the New Covenant salvation based upon faith in THE PROMISE (Rom. 3:25).