• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

what do you call yourself politically

what do you consider yourself politically?

  • right wing

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • left wing

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • center wing/moderate

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • conservative

    Votes: 18 69.2%
  • libertarian

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • liberal

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • progressive

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    26

evenifigoalone

Well-Known Member
Not a troll, anymore than someone who has "I'm that gun toting, flag waving, Bible carrying, patriotic conservative they warned you about" in their signature

Sent from my SM-J737T1 using Tapatalk
 

evenifigoalone

Well-Known Member
It is much easier to say what I am not, than what I am. :(
I understand. I've been a libertarian for years, and still consider myself one for the moment. But my fiscal views are heading in some direction of their own and I'm not sure where that is.

Sent from my SM-J737T1 using Tapatalk
 

MartyF

Well-Known Member
Jesus-follower.

I have no loyalty to any party.

I plan to vote for Trump because he is the best option.

Locally, I will vote for the most competent or the least corrupt. I will primary with whichever party is best to do so. I will vote for those who support my beliefs in God over those who don’t.

(I noticed you didn’t even list Democrat as an option. Was that an oversight?)
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Well, brother, my comment came with a wink and a nod—tongue in cheek, so to speak. "State" has a number of definitions, and in this particular case (voting) the Dems should have no trouble covering most with their political machinations. While it may sound extreme (because it would be, but that's part of the point), merely residing in another country with a different head of state hardly poses a voting problem for such shrewd workers of iniquity. I mean, really, these blatantly corrupt rascals are in the process of hurriedly impeaching the President of the United States for things they did. If they can do that, what political evil can't they do?
David doesn't live in a "state." A county, shire, or Parliamentary constituency, yes; a state no. As an Englishman, he doesn't have to deal with the Democratic Party. He's got Corbyn's Labour.
 

David Kent

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
David doesn't live in a "state." A county, shire, or Parliamentary constituency, yes; a state no. As an Englishman, he doesn't have to deal with the Democratic Party. He's got Corbyn's Labour.
Don't swear. Corbyn is a dirty word in our house. Our election is in two days time, but I have already voted by postal vote, and it wasn't for Corbyn.
 

David Kent

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, brother, my comment came with a wink and a nod—tongue in cheek, so to speak. "State" has a number of definitions, and in this particular case (voting) the Dems should have no trouble covering most with their political machinations. While it may sound extreme (because it would be, but that's part of the point), merely residing in another country with a different head of state hardly poses a voting problem for such shrewd workers of iniquity. I mean, really, these blatantly corrupt rascals are in the process of hurriedly impeaching the President of the United States for things they did. If they can do that, what political evil can't they do?

I try not to get involved in US politics, ours ore enough of a problem.
The most influential leader of a politrical party in UK is Nigel Farage (not fromage as someone called him) he said his party wont have a manifesto as the public consider politacal manifestos as lies. He is the only leader of a party who is honest. He wants one thing, to get us out of Europe.
 

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Y E E T !

How about a Constitutionalist? I believe in the Constitution of the United States, which is supposed to be the supreme law of the land. It sets out a Federalist form of government and specifies the powers of said Federal government and anything not listed as a Federal government power is left to the individual states. Unfortunately for us here in America, the original concept of Federalism as envisioned by the Founding Fathers is long gone.
 

Covenanter

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
what do you consider yourself politically?
  1. right wing
  2. left wing
  3. center wing/moderate
  4. conservative
  5. libertarian
  6. liberal
  7. progressive
None of the above - Christian socialist - but don't associate me with political parties calling themselves "Christian socialist." I support Jeremy Corbyn as one whose general policies are intended to be "for the many, not the few." There are of course specific antichristian policies that I cannot endorse - abortion & multisexism - but that goes for all parties.

Before Corbyn became the Labour leader I took position 3, & voted Liberal, Independent or Green. I certainly could not vote for the war mongering policies of the Labour leader Blair, who with Bush was responsible for the invasion of Iraq an the basis of lies. Blair's name was often mis-spelled as a result. I hoped that a Conservative led government with Liberal support, as from 2010, would lead to centre policies. However the Liberals supported the Conservative austerity measures that have resulted in extreme hardship, homelessness & deaths.

I've already voted for our local Labour candidate by post. I know her well as she sings in the community choir with me & a dozen others. Hopefully Corbyn will secure an absolute majority or be able to form a government with Scottish Nationalist support.
 
Top