Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
I believe I have touched on your main question that you raised.
I don't think you have. I understand your point about "prognosis" even though I believe you are misstating your case and the meaning of the word. The lexical sourcess support me, not you on the meaning of "foreknowledge." But be that as it may, you have not asnwered the question. If God "foreknew the determinations of the heart" (as you said), and knew this in eternity past, then does that man have a free choice? Can he change his mind? What if circumstances in life work out differently and something happens to lead him to a change of mind. Can he do that? You must answer "No he cannot" or impugn for foreknowledge of God. Once you answer "no," you have taken away man's free will and you have a God who creates people that he knows have no chance of being saved (becuase the circumstances will not change). Therefore, God creates people intending to send them to hell. Yet that is the God of Calvinism that you deplore. The reality is that your God is at the same place, he simply is not in control of it.
I welcome also your response to my post dated June 6, 2002 sent at 5:51 p.m. Most often people do not respond to things they cannot in good conscience refute.
I and many others have refuted your comments on Rom 9 many times in good conscience. You have misunderstood the passage. What else is there to say? You repeat your assertion that Pharoah first hardened his own heart when Scripture explicitly contradicts you, telling us that God made the first move. Rom 9 gives us the reason: So that God could show his power.
Electing certain events in human beings lives is clearly understandable, but not in such weighty matters as people's never dying souls. In this most serious dimension He leaves this matter to individual people.
So he arranges events that he knows will produce responses, emotions, attitudes, choices, etc. but he leaves the choice to individuals?? Ray, that does not make sense. A choice is not made in a vacuum. It is made in the context of the "certain events in human beings lives" that God ordained. In addition, when you see "election" in regards to salvation, it is always before belief and is always of individuals. I cannot think of use of "election" in a context of salvation that has to do with events. It simply is not there.