You're proving it well enough on your own, son.
You act like a kid. An uptight kid. Thus...son is fitting. Go blow your nose, it's runny. :wavey:
Just another drive-by post- typical. Welcome back. You haven't changed much, have you?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You're proving it well enough on your own, son.
You act like a kid. An uptight kid. Thus...son is fitting. Go blow your nose, it's runny. :wavey:
I apologize.
Now I'm waiting.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?I did not offer an apology.
Are you offended?
But in the posts that I've made since calling you out, identifying your remarks as derogatory and inflammatory, and thus identifying them as offensive, you haven't offered once to apologize for offending your Christian brethren.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Seems to me you offered derogatory remarks to all IFBers, knowing full well that they'd be offended; yet, when they didn't react the way you expected, you've been playing it off as "they don't visit this thread." Seems to me you owe a blanket apology to all those you lumped into one category.
Just another drive-by post- typical. Welcome back. You haven't changed much, have you?
Many younger Christians these days are more interested in getting back an authentic New Testament type of Christianity. Eschewing the "traditional" church and the mediocre type of Christianity they believe it represents, they are seeking to model their churches after what they envision the first Church was like. Contrary to popular thought, they have no problems with hymns; they often sing them with updated arrangements. They want their worship to come from the heart. They have no problem with stained glass or pews. In fact, they find value in liturgy and things like lent. Go figure!
They practice church discipline and restoration, something most of them have never seen in their daddy's church. They hold one another accountable, go through intensive doctrinal training before they can become members of the church and are serious about "community," which to them is more than a Sunday School class which has a pot luck every so often. In fact, my 27-year-old son, working on his Ph.D. in theology, wanted his community group to meet his girlfriend before they got engaged. His church community group is that important to him.
In short, by choosing a new way to express their faith, they are rejecting a Christianity which they believe to be compromised by our culture. They want a faith that runs contrary to culture, not one which accommodates it.
This article by a friend of mine exemplifies the issues:
http://baptistpress.com/bpnews.asp?id=35439
Meanwhile, those of us over 50 (many at least -- my own church reflects the younger style noted above) think that the new expression of church has gone off the deep end as far as "old time religion" is concerned. Interesting and ironic how a return to a more serious form of Christian expression -- carefully testing and aligning with Scripture instead of traditional interpretations of Scripture are driving the church forward while at the same time being opposed BY the church for doing so.
This article by a friend of mine exemplifies the issues:
http://baptistpress.com/bpnews.asp?id=35439
Quote:
Many younger Christians these days are more interested in getting back an authentic New Testament type of Christianity. . . .they are seeking to model their churches after what they envision the first Church was like. . .
. . .updated arrangements. . . .stained glass. . .lent. . . .intensive doctrinal training before they can become members of the church. . .
The apology was sincere. Read the paragraph again; do you not find the word "offensive" in there?You didn't answer the question.
And I find the remark about my reading comprehension offensive too.
Was your apology sincere? Because you keep on doing what you claimed to apologize for.
Amen. What America really needs is none of the above, but believers down on their knees, praying for an old fashioned, Holy Spirit sent revival. Buildings, type of music, liturgy, requirements, all of those are surface items.Acts 2:41
"Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls."
And these people really "envision" [whatever that means] NT-era churches having stained glass windows, "Lent", and their "updated" musical arrangements?
Bizarre.
Amen. What America really needs is none of the above, but believers down on their knees, praying for an old fashioned, Holy Spirit sent revival. Buildings, type of music, liturgy, requirements, all of those are surface items.
Every time we go to the States we are shocked at how far it has slipped morally and spiritually. We're bracing for culture shock again when we go on furlough in the fall. America won't be changed through political action, fancy buildings, proper music, etc. May God send revival to America.
It doesn't matter if a church is IFB, SBC, Reformed Baptist, whatever. The need for and requirements for revival are the same.
Every time we go to the States we are shocked at how far it has slipped morally and spiritually. We're bracing for culture shock again when we go on furlough in the fall. America won't be changed through political action, fancy buildings, proper music, etc. May God send revival to America.
It doesn't matter if a church is IFB, SBC, Reformed Baptist, whatever. The need for and requirements for revival are the same.
Acts 2:41
"Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls."
And these people really "envision" [whatever that means] NT-era churches having stained glass windows, "Lent", and their "updated" musical arrangements?
Bizarre.
The apology was sincere. Read the paragraph again; do you not find the word "offensive" in there?
You actually don't believe you've done anything that anyone would find offensive, do you? Yet, if we make similar comments about you, you immediately require an apology.
And you call me "hypocritical."
Are you going to offer an apology to IFBers for making derogatory comments about them?
Amen. What America really needs is none of the above, but believers down on their knees, praying for an old fashioned, Holy Spirit sent revival. Buildings, type of music, liturgy, requirements, all of those are surface items.
Every time we go to the States we are shocked at how far it has slipped morally and spiritually. We're bracing for culture shock again when we go on furlough in the fall. America won't be changed through political action, fancy buildings, proper music, etc. May God send revival to America.
It doesn't matter if a church is IFB, SBC, Reformed Baptist, whatever. The need for and requirements for revival are the same.
"In your area among IFBs." Did you just make a conclusion about an denomination that spans the entire world, based on "your area"? Isn't that what you intellectual types call an "over-generalization logic error"?No. Not if none of them ask for one.
Are you personally offended?
If you are I will apologize to you for inadvertently lumping you in with that crowd.
What I do not do is take back my description of that crowd. It is real. It is predominant in my area among IFBs.
It has not manifested itself on this particular thread- good.
But it has before on this site and it is here in this culture in large numbers.
What's wrong with "red neck"? What exactly do "red necks" do that doesn't honor Christ?And true revival will result in the best worship possible.
It will not be sloppy, unorganized or "red-neck", imo (unless, as I said, that is the best those particular revived Christians can do).