It needed to happen to accomplish God's will.You need to explain--what is the definition of a "necessary event"?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It needed to happen to accomplish God's will.You need to explain--what is the definition of a "necessary event"?
Here you said to destroy the works of the Devil, in your previous post you said to destroy the Devil. Those are different things. One is redemption, the other is not.
It sounds a lot like you're saying the world was created to destroy the Devil's works in the world of spirits before the world was created. But be careful here. Christ came in the form of a man, not an angel. He redeemed men, not angels. The creation of Adam has nothing to do with destroying the works of the Devil in the world of spirits. The work of Redemption of sinful men, not angels, was always the reason for the creation of the world.
Glorification resulting from the work of Redemption. I agree that the Fall and the curse were necessary components of God's plan. As I've stated, I agree that Christ's work of Redemption was the reason this world was made. It was God's first thought. Maybe you should read the OP again.
I'll argue your redemption-of-angels angle in another thread if you wish. You're still saying the Fall was a necessary event, and that Christ's act of Atonement was the main event planned for mankind in this world from the beginning. That I agree with.Do the following two verses work together for the same purpose. Remember the last enemy to be destroyed. 1 Cor 15:26 the last enemy is done away -- In the Greek. the death) death; How does God destroy/do away with, the death?
Seeing, then, the children have partaken of flesh and blood, he himself also in like manner did take part of the same, that through death he might destroy him having the power of death -- that is, the devil -- Heb 2:14
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, ( of flesh and blood, he himself also in like manner did take part of the same, that ) that he might destroy the works of the devil. 1 John 3:8
I asked in another thread: Did the sin of the devil have anything to do with the creation of Adam?
I believe Adam was created because of the sin of the devil. Created so the works of the devil and the devil himself could be destroyed through, the death, of which the devil had the power thereof, before Adam was created.
Lol. That is a wholly inadequate and somewhat paganistic view of the story. But at least I know what you're saying. You're saying the plan was to dwell forever with God in an unfallen state in an earth/heaven mix uninterrupted by the Fall. But Adam failed the test and ruined it all, then the plan of Redemption went into effect to restore the original earth/heaven mix.Aaron is talking to the straw man again. I wish Aaron would recognize what the passage in Revelation was referring to. All Aaron is doing is peppering his speech with buzz-words from Calvinism. His belief in Calvinism is blinding him to the truth of the Bible.
Oh well.
Maybe this will help since I’m not the best explainer.
If it needed to happen and it was to accomplish God's will, then God must have caused it to happen. Would you say God caused it to happen?It needed to happen to accomplish God's will.
Did God cause disobedience to his command?If it needed to happen and it was to accomplish God's will, then God must have caused it to happen. Would you say God caused it to happen?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Did God cause disobedience to his command?
No.
Did God ordain that disobedience to his command could happen and would be allowed?
Yes.
Why did God ordain disobedience to be allowed?
God doesn't tell us, nor is he obligated to tell us.
What we observe is that God was merciful to Satan and the fallen angels when they rebelled in that he did not immediately annihilate them. Yet, God provides no grace to them. Their judgment is sure.
For humans, God also was merciful when they rebelled, but he goes further and provides grace to humans to whom he chooses. He provides an atoning sacrifice and covenant of promise to his chosen.
Why?
Again, God does not fully explain, nor is he obligated to explain. But, we know God is glorified as a Redeemer of rebels by his active choice.
Ultimately we are left with two responses articulated by Job and his wife:
Job 2:9-10
Then his wife said to him, “Do you still hold fast your integrity? Curse God and die.”
But he said to her..."Shall we receive good from God, and shall we not receive evil?”
If we accept Job's proposal then we can respond to life as Habakkuk responded.
Habakkuk 3:17-19 Though the fig tree should not blossom, nor fruit be on the vines, the produce of the olive fail and the fields yield no food, the flock be cut off from the fold and there be no herd in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the Lord; I will take joy in the God of my salvation. God, the Lord, is my strength; he makes my feet like the deer’s; he makes me tread on my high places.
Typical man-centered response.Typical Calvinist double talk when it comes to the origin of sin.
If something needed to happen to fulfill God's will and it was planned to happen from before the foundation of the world, I see three possibilities here for the Calvinist:
1. God looked down through the corridors of time, saw that Adam would sin, and retroactively created his redemption plan. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.
2. God's plan was for Jesus to die on the cross from before the foundation of the world (and before Adam was alive), therefore God must have caused Adam to sin. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.
3. God's plan was for Jesus to die on the cross from before the foundation of the world (and before Adam was alive) and he waited around to see if Adam would indeed sin, so that God's plan would be fulfilled. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.
If it needed to happen and it was to accomplish God's will, then God must have caused it to happen. Would you say God caused it to happen?
Typical man-centered response.
The Serpent takes the hit for that. He caused the fall to happen.
Typical man-centered response.
It's a God-centered response, trusting in the Supremacy and Sovereignty of God.A Calvinist response is also a man-centered response. I can't believe you indict yourself.
Changes nothing as far as my three scenarios.
Did God cause the serpent to tempt Eve?
Or did God look forward in time and see that the serpent would tempt Eve?
Changes nothing as far as my three scenarios.
Did God cause the serpent to tempt Eve?
Or did God look forward in time and see that the serpent would tempt Eve?
God places the blame squarely on the Serpent and that's all I need to know.
14 And Jehovah God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, cursed art thou above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: Gen 3
("God says it and that's all I need to know" - you should add that one to your cute list of cop-out replies)
Changes nothing as far as my three scenarios.
Did God cause the serpent to tempt Eve?
Or did God look forward in time and see that the serpent would tempt Eve?
In as much as He caused Job's suffering. There is nothing that happens that is outside His control or will.If it needed to happen and it was to accomplish God's will, then God must have caused it to happen. Would you say God caused it to happen?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
In the light of these Scriptures, what is your view of the Fall, ITL?Typical Calvinist double talk when it comes to the origin of sin.
If something needed to happen to fulfill God's will and it was planned to happen from before the foundation of the world, I see three possibilities here for the Calvinist:
1. God looked down through the corridors of time, saw that Adam would sin, and retroactively created his redemption plan. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.
2. God's plan was for Jesus to die on the cross from before the foundation of the world (and before Adam was alive), therefore God must have caused Adam to sin. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.
3. God's plan was for Jesus to die on the cross from before the foundation of the world (and before Adam was alive) and he waited around to see if Adam would indeed sin, so that God's plan would be fulfilled. This view is almost always rejected by Calvinists.