Who did Christ die for? part//

We established in a different thread that he works for Waffle House.

"God is sovereign even when He's not sovereign. And if you say otherwise you are limiting God's sovereignty."

Couldn't resist.... bwaahahahahahaha....

 

Exodus and Leviticus has a lot to say about sins of ignorance. Sins done in ignorance are sins nonetheless. A sin offering had to be made for them.

If I understand it correctly, Abemilech did not sin, but if he had slept with her, he would have sinned - sinned in ignorance, but sinned nevertheless.

 

A scriptural point.

 

Webdog said it, although in different words. He said that God can leave a decision up to us yet still remain sovereign over that decision. And if I deny that, I'm limiting God's sovereignty.

That is essentially saying that God is sovereign over a decision about which He has abdicated His sovereignty -- which is to say that God is sovereign even when He's not sovereign. And I'm limiting God's sovereignty if I say differently.

Like I said, "bwaahahahahahahaha..." :laugh:

 

At least we established I work...

(self proclaimed beach bum? )

 

let the reader decide the dishonesty spoken here.

 

I thought gossip was sin? Is it sin if you are aware you are doing it or not?

 

He did, he admitted as such to Abraham after he found out who Sarah was. Why was God going to kill him EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN'T TOUCH HER?

"You are as good as dead because of the woman you have taken; she is a married woman."

I fail to see anything about touching anybody there.

 

Let's see - what are your options, now web?

1. Change the subject
2. Insist that the text says what you say it says, and ignore what it really says
3. Insult me or James
4. Try to make a witty remark
5. Disappear


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

or..... GASP .... admit you were wrong. Nah.

 

I learned from the best (angry beaver).

I'm sorry...have you ever admitted you were wrong about anything? If not, you really have no room to talk.

 

Have you already forgot this whole back and forth stemmed from something you posted related to the op? Probably not...

Speaking of the OP...are you ever going to address Allan's question asking about John's use of "whole world"?

 

And we have a combo 3 and 4! Insult AND a lame attempt at a witty remark!

Yes, I've admitted I was wrong several times on BB. For example, I insisted that "that" referred back to "faith" in Ephesians 2:8 for a long time. Then someone pointed out the Greek gender didn't match, so I had to admit I was wrong all along. And there were several other times but I can't recall what the details were at the moment.

Try it sometime. It's extremely liberating to admit when you're wrong about your interpretation of this or that Bible passage. The truth will set you free.

 

For the third time today I apologized if your remark on the other thread was not done sarcastically. Can you not understand that? Do you not acknowledge that? I'm sure my interpretation on MANY Scriptures to be wrong. I'm also sure your interpretation on MANY Scriptures to be wrong. We are human. What exactly, may I ask, are you adding to this thread besides troll-like behavior?